dc.creatorVelho L.A.Z.
dc.creatorBellangero W.
dc.creatorBahamondes L.
dc.date2007
dc.date2015-06-30T18:45:29Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:33:43Z
dc.date2015-06-30T18:45:29Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:33:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:37:07Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:37:07Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierRevista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira. , v. 53, n. 3, p. 229 - 233, 2007.
dc.identifier1044230
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34547699917&partnerID=40&md5=9ddf8455ed2e26009d4947b3c15381aa
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/104657
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/104657
dc.identifier2-s2.0-34547699917
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1247927
dc.descriptionOBJECTIVE. International studies have pointed out quantitative ultrasound as an important method to assess bone fragility and risk of fracture. This study was performed to compare quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in two groups of Brazilian women, those with a fracture and those with no previous history of fracture. The aim was to assess whether there was any difference between the right and the left foot s and whether two sequential measurements in each foot were statistically equivalent... METHODS: A total of 52 women, 26 with and 26 with no fractures, matched by age (± 2 years), years since menopause (± 2 years), and body mass index (kg/m 2) (± 2) were evaluated. RESULTS: Results were compared by the Student's t test for matched samples. Values (mean ± SD) for the stiffness index (SI) were 54.9 (± 16.6) and 80.4 (± 17.3), and for the T Score were -2.9 (± 0.94) and -1.3 (± 0.95) for the groups with and with no fractures, respectively. The first and second measurements of the SI for the right foot and the mean measurement of each foot were found similar when compared. There was a statistical significance (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The QUS was shown to distinguish between women with and with no fractures. Also, no differences were observed in the QUS of the left or right foot as well as in the first or second measurements of each foot in the women under study.
dc.description53
dc.description3
dc.description229
dc.description233
dc.descriptionProphylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis (1993) Am J Med, 94, pp. 646-650. , Consensus Development Conference
dc.descriptionBabbitt, A.M., When the fracture care is not enough (1994) Osteporos Orthop, 17, pp. 935-941
dc.descriptionRay NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, Meltron LJ 3rd. Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotics fractures in the United States in 1997. Report of the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:24-35Brasil, da Saúde, M., Campanha Nacional de Prevenção da Osteoporose (2001) Brasília (DF)
dc.descriptionBaran, D., Quantitative ultrasound: A technique to target women with low bone mass for preventive therapy (1995) Am J Med, 98, pp. 48S-51S
dc.descriptionTosi, L., Lane, J.M., Osteoporosis prevention and orthopaedic surgeon. When fracture care is not enough (1998) J Bone Joint Surg, 11, pp. 1567-1569
dc.descriptionStewart, A., Reid, D.M., Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors - which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis? (2000) Br J Radiol, 73, pp. 165-171
dc.descriptionRozemberg, S., Vandromme, J., Kroll, M., Twagirayezu, P., Vyankandondera, J., Claus, K., The brittle bone: How to save women from osteoporosis (1997) Int J. Fertil, 42, pp. 101-106
dc.descriptionPhillipov, G., Holsman, M., Phillips, J., The clinical role of quantitative ultrasound in assessing fracture risk and bone status (2000) Med J Aust, 173, pp. 208-211
dc.descriptionNational Guidelines Clearinghouse. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for prevention and treatment of post menopause osteoporosis, 2001-2003 [cited 2006 mar 16]. Avaliable from: http://www.guidelines.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id= 4157&nbr=003185&string=osteoporosis+AND+endocrinologyRinga, V., Duriex, P., Breart, G., Bone mass measurements around menopause and prevention of osteoporotic fractures (1994) Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 54, pp. 205-213
dc.descriptionConsenso Brasileiro de Osteoporose (2002) Brasília (DF), , Conselho Federal de Medicina, 14p
dc.descriptionRoux, C., Dougados, M., Quantitative ultrasound in postmenopausal osteoporosis (2000) Curr Opin Rheumatol, 12, pp. 336-345
dc.descriptionCheng, S., Tylavsky, F., Carbone, L., Utility of ultrasound to assess risk of fracture (1997) J Am Geriatr Soc, 45, pp. 1382-1394
dc.descriptionMagaro, M., Zoli, A., Caricchio, R., Angelosante, S., Mirone, L., Altomonte, L., Ultrassonografia quantitative nello studio dell' osteoporosi postmenopausale. Confronto com L'assorbimetria a raggi X a doppia energia (1995) Ann Ital Med Int, 10, pp. 218-221
dc.description(1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis, , World Health Organization, Genova: WHO;
dc.descriptionRecker, R.R., Architecture and vertebral fracture (1993) Calcif Tissue Int, 53, pp. 139S-142S
dc.descriptionKulak, C.A., Bilazikian, J.P., Bone mass measurement in identification of women at risk for osteoporosis (1999) Int J Fertil, 44, pp. 269-278
dc.descriptionGambacciani, M., Ciaponi, M., Postmenopausal osteoporosis management (2000) Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 12, pp. 189-197
dc.descriptionDelmas, P.D., How should the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women be assessed? (1999) Osteoporos Int, 2, pp. S33-SS9
dc.descriptionPinheiro, M.M., Castro, C.M., Szejnfeld, V.L., Low femoral bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound are risk factors for new osteoporotic fracture and total and cardiovascular mortality: A 5-year population-based study of Brazilian elderly women (2006) J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 61, pp. 196-203
dc.descriptionMeszaros, S., Toth, E., Ferencz, V., Csupor, E., Hosszu, E., Horvath, C., Calcaneous quantitative ultrasound measurements predicts vertebral fractures in idiopathic male osteoporosis (2007) Joint Bone Spine, 74, pp. 79-84
dc.languagept
dc.publisher
dc.relationRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleQuantitative Calcaneal Ultrasound Evaluation Allows Distinguishing Women With And Without Fractures [avaliação Quantitativ Ultra-sonográfica Do Calcâneo Permite Diferenciar Mulheres Com E Sem Fraturas ósseas Recentes]
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución