dc.creatorBottini P.V.
dc.creatorGarlipp C.R.
dc.date2006
dc.date2015-06-30T18:17:57Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:29:15Z
dc.date2015-06-30T18:17:57Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:29:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:32:28Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:32:28Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierJornal Brasileiro De Patologia E Medicina Laboratorial. , v. 42, n. 3, p. 157 - 162, 2006.
dc.identifier16762444
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33747444980&partnerID=40&md5=f22ae6d04e2bd90867774b953f2044f1
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/103874
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/103874
dc.identifier2-s2.0-33747444980
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1246793
dc.descriptionIntroduction: Urinalysis is a high demand procedure, with large amount of manual labor and poorly standardized. The purpose of this investigation was to analyze the performance of an automated system based on flow cytometry for routine urinalysis. Material and methods: We analyzed 1,140 urine samples by light field microscopy and by flow cytometry (UF-100/SYSMEX). For the precision study of the UF-100, we calculated the within-run and between-run coefficients of variation using two different levels of commercial controls and four different urine samples. Results: Erythrocytes and leukocytes counts by the two methods showed an agreement of 91% and 93%, respectively. Casts, epithelial cells and bacteria counts by the UF-100 showed a significant overlap when compared to microscopic analysis. Intra assay precision (within-run) ranged from 4% to 155% and interassay precision (between-run) varied from 3% to 25%, depending on the considered parameter. Conclusion: Flow cytometry is a precise and reproducible technique, with a strong correlation with the results obtained by microscopic analysis. Flow cytometry allows a better workflow and a new manner of reporting and interpreting routine urinalysis.
dc.description42
dc.description3
dc.description157
dc.description162
dc.descriptionAndriolo, A., Avaliação de um sistema totalmente automatizado para a realização do exame de urina de rotina: Urina tipo I (1999) NewsLab, 36, pp. 76-80
dc.descriptionBen-Ezra, J., Bork, L., Macpherson, R.A., Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer (1998) Clin Chem, 44, pp. 92-95
dc.descriptionDelanghe, J.R., The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice (2000) Clin Chim Acta, 301, pp. 1-18
dc.descriptionDimech, W., Roney, K., Evaluation of an automated urinalysis system for testing urine chemistry, microscopy and culture (2002) Pathology, 34, pp. 170-177
dc.descriptionEuropean urinalysis guidelines (2000) Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 60, p. 231
dc.descriptionFenili, D., Pirovano, B., The automation of sediment urinalysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100) (1998) Clin Chem Lab Med, 36 (12), pp. 909-917
dc.descriptionKeijzer, M.H., Brandts, R.W., Flow cytometry and the urine laboratory: Field evaluation of the SYSMEX UF-100. SYSMEX (1997) J Int, 7, pp. 117-122
dc.descriptionKim, Y., Quantitative analysis of urine sediment using newly designed centrifuge tubes (2002) Ann Clin Lab Sci, 32, pp. 55-60
dc.descriptionKouri, T.T., Evaluation of SYSMEX UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs. chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures (1999) Am J Clin Pathol, 112, pp. 25-35
dc.descriptionLanglois, M.R., Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis (1999) Clin Chem, 45, pp. 118-122
dc.description(1995) Urinalysis and Collection, Transpor Tation and Preservation of Urine Specimens
dc.descriptionApproved Guideline: NCCLS Document GP 16-A, , Wayne, PA: NCCLS
dc.descriptionOttiger, C., Huber, A.R., Quantitative urine particle analysis: Integrative approach for the optimal combination of automation with UF-100 and microscopic review with KOVA cell chamber (2003) Clin Chem, 49, pp. 617-623
dc.descriptionWinkel, P., Statland, B.E., Jorgensen, K., Urine microscopy, an ill defined method, examined by a multifactorial technique (1974) Clin Chem, 20, pp. 436-439
dc.languagept
dc.publisher
dc.relationJornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleUrinalysis: Comparison Between Microscopic And Flow Cytometry Analysis [urinálise: Comparação Entre Microscopia óptica E Citometria De Fluxo]
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución