dc.creatorNegra M.D.
dc.creatorDe Carvalho A.P.
dc.creatorDe Aquino M.Z.
dc.creatorDa Silva M.T.N.
dc.creatorPinto J.
dc.creatorWhite K.
dc.creatorArterburn S.
dc.creatorLiu Y.-P.
dc.creatorEnejosa J.V.
dc.creatorCheng A.K.
dc.creatorChuck S.L.
dc.creatorRhee M.S.
dc.date2012
dc.date2015-06-26T20:30:02Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:26:58Z
dc.date2015-06-26T20:30:02Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:26:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:30:03Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:30:03Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierPediatric Infectious Disease Journal. , v. 31, n. 5, p. 469 - 473, 2012.
dc.identifier8913668
dc.identifier10.1097/INF.0b013e31824bf239
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84862803868&partnerID=40&md5=d78b5571122d7b7e8697f0e77ff0c8fc
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/97212
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/97212
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84862803868
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1246210
dc.descriptionBackground: There are few data on the safety and antiviral activity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in HIV-1 infected adolescents. Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Ninety adolescents (12 to <18 years) who were viremic while receiving antiretroviral treatment were randomized to receive TDF 300 mg (mean, 216.8 mg/m) or placebo in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR) for 48 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was time-weighted average change in plasma HIV-1 RNA from baseline at week 24 Results: Eighty-seven subjects (45 TDF, 42 placebo) received the study drug. Through week 24, the median time-weighted average change in plasma HIV-1 RNA was not different between the TDF and placebo groups (-1.6 versus-1.6 log10copies/mL, P = 0.55). The percentages of subjects who achieved HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL were similar at week 24 (40.9 versus 41.5%). One fourth of subjects in the TDF and placebo groups (24.4 versus 28.6%) had at least 3 active agents in the OBR. Many subjects in both groups had baseline genotypic resistance to TDF (48.9 versus 33.3%). TDF was generally safe and well tolerated. There were no statistically significant differences in changes of renal function and bone mineral density between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study of TDF in combination with an OBR in antiretroviral- experienced adolescents did not meet its primary or secondary efficacy endpoints. The effectiveness of the OBR and baseline genotypic resistance to TDF in both groups may have confounded the efficacy findings. No clinically relevant TDF-related renal or bone toxicities were observed in this adolescent population. Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
dc.description31
dc.description5
dc.description469
dc.description473
dc.description(2008) HIV Surveillance Report, 20. , http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/surveillance/resources/reports/2008report/pdf/ 2008SurveillanceReport.pdf, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Accessed November 1, 2010
dc.descriptionGallant, J.E., Staszewski, S., Pozniak, A.L., Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviralnaive patients: A 3-year randomized trial (2004) JAMA, 292, pp. 191-201. , 903 Study Group
dc.descriptionGallant, J.E., Dejesus, E., Arribas, J.R., Tenofovir DF emtricitabine and efavirenz vs. zidovudine lamivudine and efavirenz for HIV (2006) N Engl J Med, 354, pp. 251-260. , Study 934 Group
dc.descriptionSchwartz, G.J., Gauthier, B., A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in adolescent boys (1985) J Pediatr, 106, pp. 522-526
dc.descriptionSchwartz, G.J., Haycock, G.B., Edelmann Jr., C.M., A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine (1976) Pediatrics, 58, pp. 259-263
dc.descriptionHIV-1 Genotypic Drug Resistance Interpretation's Algorithms, , http://www.hivfrenchresistance.org/tab2008.html, HIV French Resistance Accessed November 1, 2010
dc.descriptionDawson, J., Comparing treatment groups on the basis of slopes, areas-underthe-curve, and other summary measures (1994) Drug Inf J, 28, pp. 723-732
dc.descriptionKahn, J., Lagakos, S., Wulfsohn, M., Efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil with antiretroviral therapy: A randomized controlled trial (1999) JAMA, 282, pp. 2305-2312
dc.descriptionKatlama, C., Haubrich, R., Lalezari, J., Efficacy and safety of etravirine in treatment-experienced, HIV-1 patients: Pooled 48 week analysis of two randomized, controlled trials (2009) AIDS, 23, pp. 2289-2300. , DUET-1, DUET-2 study groups
dc.descriptionO'Brien, K.O., Razavi, M., Henderson, R.A., Bone mineral content in girls perinatally infected with HIV (2001) Am J Clin Nutr, 73, pp. 821-826
dc.descriptionZuccotti, G., Vigan̈, A., Gabiano, C., Antiretroviral therapy and bone mineral measurements in HIV-infected youths (2010) Bone, 46, pp. 1633-1638
dc.descriptionMora, S., Sala, N., Bricalli, D., Bone mineral loss through increased bone turnover in HIV-infected children treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (2001) AIDS, 15, pp. 1823-1829
dc.descriptionMora, S., Zamproni, I., Giacomet, V., Analysis of bone mineral content in horizontally HIV-infected children na?e to antiretroviral treatment (2005) Calcif Tissue Int, 76, pp. 336-340
dc.descriptionMora, S., Zamproni, I., Beccio, S., Longitudinal changes of bone mineral density and metabolism in antiretroviral-treated human immunodeficiency virus-infected children (2004) J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 89, pp. 24-28
dc.descriptionGafni, R.I., Hazra, R., Reynolds, J.C., Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and an optimized background regimen of antiretroviral agents as salvage therapy: Impact on bone mineral density in HIV-infected children (2006) Pediatrics, 118, pp. e711-e718
dc.descriptionPurdy, J.B., Gafni, R.I., Reynolds, J.C., Decreased bone mineral density with off-label use of tenofovir in children and adolescents infected with human immunodeficiency virus (2008) J Pediatr, 152, pp. 582-584
dc.descriptionGiacomet, V., Mora, S., Martelli, L., A 12-month treatment with tenofovir does not impair bone mineral accrual in HIV-infected children (2005) J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 40, pp. 448-450
dc.descriptionHazra, R., Gafni, R.I., Maldarelli, F., Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and an optimized background regimen of antiretroviral agents as salvage therapy for pediatric HIV infection (2005) Pediatrics, 116, pp. e846-e854
dc.descriptionRiordan, A., Judd, A., Boyd, K., Tenofovir use in human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected children in the United kingdom and Ireland (2009) Pediatr Infect Dis J, 28, pp. 204-209. , Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study
dc.description(2010) Clinical Review, , http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/ DevelopmentResources/UCM209151.pdf, Food and Drug Administration March Accessed June 1, 2011
dc.descriptionNelson, R.M., Lewis, L.L., Struble, K., Ethical and regulatory considerations for the inclusion of adolescents in HIV biomedical prevention research (2010) J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 54 (SUPPL. 1), pp. S18-S24
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationPediatric Infectious Disease Journal
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleA Randomized Study Of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate In Treatment- Experienced Hiv-1 Infected Adolescents
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución