One of the key issues that must be addressed in the biofuel production based on sugarcane industry is the energy consumption of the process. Process energy demand has direct impact on the amount of lignocellulosic material available for use as feedstock for second generation ethanol production. A significant fraction of the energy consumption in bioethanol production occurs in the purification step, since conventional fermentation systems employed in the industry require low substrate concentration and, consequently, produce wine of low (around 8.5 °GL) ethanol content that must be distilled in order to meet product specifications. In this study alternatives to the conventional fermentation processes employed in the industry (low temperature fermentation and vacuum extractive fermentation) were assessed, in the context of a large scale sugarcane autonomous distillery, through computer simulation. Electricity consumption and lignocellulosic material surplus on each case were evaluated. It is shown that the alternative fermentation processes allow a significant reduction on vinasse generation and increases ethanol production when compared with conventional fermentation, but increases electricity consumption (for the extractive fermentation) or steam consumption (for low temperature fermentation); when vinasse concentration is considered in the conventional process, steam consumption in the extractive fermentation is also significantly smaller. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.98 548555Balat, M., Balat, H., Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel (2009) Appl Energy, 86, pp. 2273-2282Gauder, M., Graeff-Hönninger, S., Claupein, W., The impact of a growing bioethanol industry on food production in Brazil (2011) Appl Energy, 88, pp. 672-679Börjesson, P., Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective - what determines this? (2009) Appl Energy, 86, pp. 589-594Yan, J., Lin, T., Biofuels in Asia (2009) Appl Energy, 86, pp. S1-S10Mussatto, S.I., Dragone, G., Guimarães, P.M.R., Silva, J.P.A., Carneiro, L.M., Roberto, I.C., Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production (2010) Biotechnol Adv, 28, pp. 817-830Morandin, M., Toffolo, A., Lazzaretto, A., Maréchal, F., Ensinas, A.V., Nebra, S.A., Synthesis and parameter optimization of a combined sugar and ethanol production process integrated with a CHP system (2011) Energy, 36, pp. 3675-3690Alonso Pippo, W., Luengo, C.A., Alonsoamador Morales Alberteris, L., Garzone, P., Cornacchia, G., Energy recovery from sugarcane-trash in the light of 2nd generation biofuels. Part 1: Current situation and environmental aspects (2011) Waste Biomass Valor, 2, pp. 1-16García, C.A., Fuentes, A., Henneckec, A., Riegelhaupt, E., Manzini, F., Masera, O., Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of sugarcane ethanol production in Mexico (2011) Appl Energy, 88, pp. 2088-2097Starfelt, F., Daianova, L., Yan, J., Thorin, E., Dotzauer, E., The impact of lignocellulosic ethanol yields in polygeneration with district heating - a case study (2012) Appl Energy, 92, pp. 791-799Pellegrini, L.F., Oliveira, S., Combined production of sugar, ethanol and electricity: thermoeconomic and environmental analysis and optimization (2011) Energy, 36, pp. 3704-3715Atala, D.I.P., Set-up, instrumentation, control and experimental development of an extractive fermentation process for ethanol production (2004), PhD Thesis. Campinas: School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas (in Portuguese)Olivério, J.L., Barreira, S.T., Boscariol, F.C., César, A.R.P., Yamakawa, C.K., Alcoholic fermentation with temperature controlled by ecological absorption chiller-EcoChill (2010) Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol, p. 27Phisalaphong, M., Srirattana, N., Tanthapanichakoon, W., Mathematical modeling to investigate temperature effect on kinetic parameters of ethanol fermentation (2006) Biochem Eng J, 28, pp. 36-43Seabra, J.E.A., Tao, L., Chum, H.L., Macedo, I.C., A techno-economic evaluation of the effects of centralized cellulosic ethanol and co-products refinery options with sugarcane mill clustering (2010) Biomass Bioenerg, 34, pp. 1065-1078Rivera, E.C., Costa, A.C., Atala, D.I.P., Maugeri, F., Wolf Maciel, M.R., Maciel Filho, R., Evaluation of optimization techniques for parameter estimation: application to ethanol fermentation considering the effect of temperature (2006) Process Biochem, 41, pp. 1682-1687Mariano, A.P., Costa, C.B.B., Angelis, D.F., Maugeri Filho, F., Atala, D.I.P., Wolf Maciel, M.R., Optimisation of a continuous flash fermentation for butanol production using the response surface methodology (2010) Chem Eng Res Des, 88, pp. 562-571Silva, F.L.H., Rodrigues, M.I., Maugeri, F., Dynamic modelling, simulation and optimization of an extractive continuous alcoholic fermentation process (1999) J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 74, pp. 176-182Maugeri Filho, F., Atala, D.I.P., Vacuum extractive fermentation process for ethanol production (in Portuguese) (2006), Patent PI 0500321-0 A. BrazilMantelatto, P.E., Data about sugarcane processing (personal communication) (2010)Somers, S., Mortazavi, A., Hwang, Y., Radermacher, R., Rodgers, P., Al-Hashimi, S., Modeling water/lithium bromide absorption chillers in ASPEN Plus (2011) Appl Energy, 88, pp. 4197-4205