dc.creatorLopes M.B.
dc.creatorSaquy P.C.
dc.creatorMoura S.K.
dc.creatorWang L.
dc.creatorGraciano F.M.O.
dc.creatorSobrinho L.C.
dc.creatorGonini Jr. A.
dc.date2012
dc.date2015-06-26T20:29:10Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:25:34Z
dc.date2015-06-26T20:29:10Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:25:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:28:10Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:28:10Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierBrazilian Dental Journal. , v. 23, n. 6, p. 692 - 697, 2012.
dc.identifier1036440
dc.identifier10.1590/S0103-64402012000600011
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84872968041&partnerID=40&md5=69170313ad72b20457a2f04d968a5c9e
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/96914
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/96914
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84872968041
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1245773
dc.descriptionThis study evaluated the effectiveness of different sealants applied to a nanofiller composite resin. Forty specimens of Filtek Z-350 were obtained after inserting the material in a 6x3 mm stainless steel mold followed by light activation for 20 s. The groups were divided (n=10) according to the surface treatment applied: Control group (no surface treatment), Fortify, Fortify Plus and Biscover LV. The specimens were subjected to simulated toothbrushing using a 200 g load and 250 strokes/min to simulate 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months and 1 and 3 years in the mouth, considering 10,000 cycles equivalent to 1 year of toothbrushing. Oral-B soft-bristle-tip toothbrush heads and Colgate Total dentifrice at a 1:2 water-dilution were used. After each simulated time, surface roughness was assessed in random triplicate readings. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a 95% confidence level. The specimens were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after each toothbrushing cycle. The control group was not significantly different (p>0.05) from the other groups, except for Fortify Plus (p<0.05), which was rougher. No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed at the 1-month assessment between the experimental and control groups. Fortify and Fortify Plus presented a rougher surface over time, differing from the baseline (p<0.05). Biscover LV did not differ (p>0.05) from the baseline at any time. None of the experimental groups showed a significantly better performance (p>0.05) than the control group at any time. SEM confirmed the differences found during the roughness testing. Surface penetrating sealants did not improve the roughness of nanofiller composite resin.
dc.description23
dc.description6
dc.description692
dc.description697
dc.descriptionCoelho-de-Souza, F.H., Rocha, A.C., Rubini, A., Klein-Junior, C.A., Demarco, F.F., Influence of adhesive system and bevel preparation on fracture strength of teeth restored with composite resin (2010) Braz Dent J, 21, pp. 327-331
dc.descriptionDall'Magro, E., Correr, A.B., Costa, A.R., Correr, G.M., Consani, R.L., Correr-Sobrinho, L., Effect of different photoactivation techniques on the bond strength of a dental composite (2010) Braz Dent J, 21, pp. 220-224
dc.descriptionde Paula, A.B., Tango, R.N., Sinhoreti, M.A., Alves, M.C., Puppin-Rontani, R.M., Effect of thickness of indirect restoration and distance from the light-curing unit tip on the hardness of a dualcured resin cement (2010) Braz Dent J, 21, pp. 117-122
dc.descriptionDickinson, G.L., Leinfelder, K.F., Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant (1993) J Am Dent Assoc, 124, pp. 68-72
dc.descriptiondos Santos, P.H., Consani, S., Correr, S.L., Coelho, S.M.A., Effect of surface penetrating sealant on roughness of posterior composite resins (2003) Am J Dent, 16, pp. 197-201
dc.descriptionDos Santos, P.H., Pavan, S., Consani, S., Sobrinho, L.C., Sinhoreti, M.A., Filho, J.N., In vitro evaluation of surface roughness of 4 resin composites after the toothbrushing process and methods to recover superficial smoothness (2007) Quintessence Int, 38, pp. e247-e253
dc.descriptionWang, L., Garcia, F.C., de Araujo, P.A., Franco, E.B., Mondelli, R.F., Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test (2004) J Esthet Restor Dent, 16, pp. 303-314. , discussion 14-15
dc.descriptionAzevedo, C.G.S., de Goes, M.F., Ambrosano, G.M.B., Chan, D.C.N., 1-year clinical study of indirect resin composite restorations luted with a self-adhesive resin cement: Effect of enamel etching (2012) Braz Dent J, 23, pp. 97-103
dc.descriptionValentini, F., Oliveira, S.G., Guimarães, G.Z., Barbosa, R.P., Moraes, R.R., Effect of surface sealant on the color stability of composite resin restorations (2011) Braz Dent J, 22, pp. 365-368
dc.descriptionDelfino, C.S., Duarte Jr., S., Effect of the composite surface sealant application moment on marginal sealing of compactable composite resin restoration (2007) J Mater Sci Mater Med, 18, pp. 2257-2261
dc.descriptionMitra, S.B., Wu, D., Holmes, B.N., An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials (2003) J Am Dent Assoc, 134, pp. 1382-1390
dc.descriptionOwens, B.M., Johnson, W.W., Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations (2006) Oper Dent, 31, pp. 481-488
dc.descriptionLowe, R.A., Using BisCover surface sealant/polish on direct and indirect composite and bisacrylic provisional restorations (2004) Compend Contin Educ Dent, 25, pp. 400-401
dc.descriptionCilli, R., de Mattos, M.C., Honorio, H.M., Rios, D., de Araujo, P.A., Prakki, A., The role of surface sealants in the roughness of composites after a simulated toothbrushing test (2009) J Dent, 37, pp. 970-977
dc.descriptionGuiraldo, R.D., Consani, S., Consani, R.L., Berger, S.B., Mendes, W.B., Sinhoreti, M.A., Comparison of silorane and methacrylatebased composite resins on the curing light transmission (2010) Braz Dent J, 21, pp. 538-542
dc.descriptionShabayek, N.M., Hassan, F.M., Mobarak, E.H., Effect of using siloranebased resin compostie for restoring conservative cavities on the changes in cuspal deflection (2012) Oper Dent, , [Epub ahead of print. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/12-035-L]
dc.descriptionSuzuki, T., Kyoizumi, H., Finger, W.J., Kanehira, M., Endo, T., Utterodt, A., Resistance of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites to toothbrush abrasion with calcium carbonate slurry (2009) Dent Mater J, 28, pp. 708-716
dc.descriptionMoncada, G., Fernández, E., Martín, J., Arancibia, C., Mjör, I.A., Gordan, V.V., Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: A two-year clinical trial (2008) Oper Dent, 33, pp. 258-264
dc.descriptionJudes, H., Lieberman, R., Serebro, L., Bem Amar, A., Rebonding as a method of controlling marginal microleakage in composite resin restorations (1992) N Y J Dent, 52, pp. 137-143
dc.descriptionDavis, N., A nanotechnology composite (2003) Compend Contin Educ Dent, 24, pp. 662+665-667+669-670
dc.descriptionCastañeda, E.R., Silva, L.A., Gaton-Hernández, P., Consolaro, A., Rodriguez, E.G., Silva, R.A., FIltek silorane and Filtek supreme XT resins: Tissue reaction after subcutaneous implantation in isogenic mice (2011) Braz Dent J, 22, pp. 105-110
dc.descriptionYap, A.U., Tan, C.H., Chung, S.M., Wear behavior of new composite restoratives (2004) Oper Dent, 29, pp. 269-274
dc.descriptionPerez, C.R., Hirata, R.J., da Silva, A.H., Sampaio, E.M., de Miranda, M.S., Effect of a glaze/composite sealant on the 3-D surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials (2009) Oper Dent, 34, pp. 674-680
dc.descriptionShinkai, K., Suzuki, S., Leinfelder, K.F., Katoh, Y., Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents (1994) Quintessence Int, 25, pp. 767-771
dc.descriptionKoh, R., Neiva, G., Dennison, J., Yaman, P., Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites (2008) J Contemp Dent Pract, 9, pp. 138-145
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleEffect Of Different Surface Penetrating Sealants On The Roughness Of A Nanofiller Composite Resin
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución