dc.creatorBottini P.V.
dc.creatorMartinez M.H.M.
dc.creatorGarlipp C.R.
dc.date2014
dc.date2015-06-25T17:52:08Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:13:56Z
dc.date2015-06-25T17:52:08Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:13:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:14:45Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:14:45Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierClinical Laboratory. Verlag Klinisches Labor Gmbh, v. 60, n. 4, p. 693 - 697, 2014.
dc.identifier14336510
dc.identifier10.7754/Clin.Lab.2013.130725
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84898844595&partnerID=40&md5=1dd7515fe453677bb9528a9eab14097a
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/86220
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/86220
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84898844595
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1242397
dc.descriptionBackground: Urinalysis is a high demand procedure, with a large amount of manual labor and poorly standardized. Recently a new walk-away automated urine analyzer has been introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of UriSed as an alternative to the microscopic analysis of urine samples. Methods: Four hundred mid-stream urine samples from patients with several clinical conditions were analyzed by bright field microscopy and by UriSed. The validation protocol included studies of precision, carryover, and comparison with the gold standard microscopy. Results: Our data showed that UriSed is a precise method. Repeatability and reproducibility ranged from 8 to 15%. Carryover was negligible. All the elements showed good agreement between both methods, with an extremely high correlation between the erythrocyte and leukocyte counts (r > 0.95) Conclusions: UriSed is a precise and accurate alternative to microscopy that allows a better workflow and may significantly improve turnaround time.
dc.description60
dc.description4
dc.description693
dc.description697
dc.descriptionWinkel, P., Statland, B.E., Jorgenson, J., Urine microscopy: An ill-defined method examined by a multifactorial technique (1974) Clin Chem, 20, pp. 436-439
dc.descriptionDelanghe, J.R., Kouri, T.T., Huber, A.R., The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice (2000) Clinica Chimica Acta, 301, pp. 1-18
dc.descriptionLanglois, M.R., Delanghe, J.R., Steyaert, S.R., Everaert, K.C., De Buyzere, M.L., Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis (1999) Clinical Chemistry, 45, pp. 1118-1122
dc.descriptionBlock, D.R., Lieske, J.C., Automated urinalysis in the clinical lab (2012) Medical Laboratory Observer, 44 (10), pp. 8-10
dc.descriptionBarta, Z., Tünde, K., Bayer, G., UriSed technology - A standardised automatic method of urine sediment analysis (2011) European Infectious Disease, 5 (2), pp. 139-142
dc.descriptionEvaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods (2004) CLSI Document EP05-A2, , Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI
dc.descriptionUser verification of performance for precision and trueness
dc.descriptionapproved guideline (2005) CLSI Document EP15-A2, , Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. second edition. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI
dc.descriptionGuidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting and cell marker applications (1994) Clin Lab Haemat, 16, pp. 157-174. , International Council for Standardization in Haematology
dc.descriptionSzwed, J.J., Schaust, C., The Importance of microscopic examination of the urinary sediment (1982) American Journal of Medical Technology, 48 (2), pp. 141-143
dc.descriptionShaw Jr., S.T., Poon, S.Y., Wong, E.T., "Routine urinalysis": Is the dipstick enough? (1985) JAMA, 253, pp. 1596-1600
dc.descriptionResnick, M., Comment on simplifying urinalysis (1985) Clin Chem, 31, pp. 450-451
dc.descriptionWald, R., Bell, C.M., Nisenbaum, R., Interobserver reliability of urine sediment interpretation (2009) Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 4, pp. 567-571
dc.descriptionTsai, J.J., Yeun, J.Y., Kumar, V.A., Don, B.R., Comparison and interpretation of urinalysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital-based clinical laboratory (2005) American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 46 (5), pp. 820-829
dc.descriptionAkin, O.K., Serdat, M.A., Cizmeci, Z., Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ®200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis (2009) Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 53, pp. 139-144
dc.descriptionBlock, D.R., Lieske, J.C., Automated urinalysis in the clinical lab (2012) MLO Med Lab Obs, 44 (10), pp. 8-10+12. , quiz 14
dc.descriptionMayo, S., Acevedo, D., Quiñones-Torrelo, C., Canós, I., Sancho, M., Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: Comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments (2008) J Clin Lab Anal, 22 (4), pp. 262-270
dc.descriptionZaman, Z., Fogazzi, G.B., Garigali, G., Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX® - A new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser (2010) Clinica Chimica Acta, 411, pp. 147-154
dc.descriptionJiang, T., Chen, P., Ouyang, J., Zhang, S., Cai, D., Urine particles analysis: Performance evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i and comparison among urine flow cytometer, dipstick, and visual microscopic examination (2011) Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 71 (1), pp. 30-37
dc.descriptionManoni, F., Tinello, A., Fornasiero, L., Urine particle evaluation: A comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy (2010) Clin Chem Lab Med, 48 (8), pp. 1107-1111
dc.descriptionManoni, F., Gessoni, G., Alessio, M.G., Mid-stream vs. first-voided urine collection by using automated analyzers for particle examination in healthy subjects: An Italian multicenter study (2011) Clin Chem Lab Med, 50 (4), pp. 679-684
dc.languageen
dc.publisherVerlag Klinisches Labor GmbH
dc.relationClinical Laboratory
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleUrinalysis: Comparison Between Microscopic Analysis And A New Automated Microscopy Image-based Urine Sediment Instrument
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución