dc.creatorDe Moraes A.C.
dc.creatorBankoff A.D.P.
dc.date2003
dc.date2015-06-30T17:32:16Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:11:26Z
dc.date2015-06-30T17:32:16Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:11:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:11:58Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:11:58Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierElectromyography And Clinical Neurophysiology. , v. 43, n. 4, p. 241 - 249, 2003.
dc.identifier0301150X
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0038506230&partnerID=40&md5=556d8801acc8d0eee04eebc9bcbd019f
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/102530
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/102530
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0038506230
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1241729
dc.descriptionThe action of the column extensor muscles has been studied through in the electromyography in various corporal postures. We verified the electromyography responses of the iliocostalis lumborum muscle during various movements and positions. 12 individuals males, sedentary, between 36 and 52 years old (average 46.16), weighing an average of 79.66 kilos, and with an average height of 173.0 cm, all working as drivers were studied. Electromyography with six channels and surface electrodes was used. The electrodes were placed on the right side of the trunk in the direction of the third and fifth lumbar vertebrae ICL2 and (ICL1 respectively). In orthostatic position, the flexion movement presented RMS 31,18 (±5,73) in ICL1 and 58,10 (±14,81) in ICL2; in extension the RMS 32,46 (±9,17) in ICL1 and 55,31 (±16,70) in ICL2; in homolateral rotation the RMS 30,05 (±10,60) in ICL1 and 53,29 (±19,70) in ICL2; in heterolateral rotation the RMS 24,76 (±5,99) in ICL1 and 44,79 (±15,26) in ICL2. In seated in a chair without a back, the flexion presented RMS 22,42 (±2,89) in ICL1 and 43,39 (±5,68) in ICL2; in extension the RMS 22,47 (±1,95) in ICL1 and 41,28 (±6,20) in ICL2; in homolateral rotation the RMS 24,10 (±3,97) in ICL1 and 47,94 (±5,80) in ICL2; in heterolateral rotation, the RMS 22,59 (±1,95) in ICL1 and 43,15 (±5,71) in ICL2. In the position seated on the ground, the flexion presented RMS 22,83 (±3,00) in ICL1 and 50,99 (±11,19) in ICL2; in extension the RMS 22,39 (±3,22) in ICL1 and 46,44 (±8,19) in ICL2. The results are expressed in RMS, indicating the participation of the iliocostalis lumborum muscle during the movements undertaken. The place identified as ICL2 presented action potential of greater amplitude than the place identified as ICL1 in all movements and positions.
dc.description43
dc.description4
dc.description241
dc.description249
dc.descriptionAndersson, G.B.J., Chaffin, D.B., Pope, M.H., Occupational biomechanics of the lumbar spine (1984) Occupational Low Back Pain, pp. 38-67
dc.descriptionÖrtengren, R., Myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting (1974) Scandinavian Journal Rehabilitation, (SUPPL. 3), pp. 73-90
dc.descriptionHerberts, P., Quantitative electromyographic studies of back muscle activity related to posture and loading (1977) Othopedic Clinics of North America, 8 (1), pp. 85-95
dc.descriptionAsmussen, E., The weight-carrying function of the human spine (1960) Acta Orthop. Scand., 29, pp. 276-290
dc.descriptionBankoff, A.D.P., Moraes, A.C., Lopes, M.B.S., Salve, M.G.C., Ferrarezi, M.P.S., Electromyographic study of iliocostalis lumborun, longissumus dorsi and spinalis thoracic muscles in various positions and movement (2000) Electromyographic and Clinical Neurophysiology, (40), pp. 345-349
dc.descriptionBasmajian, J.V., (1976) Electrofisiologia de la Acción Muscular, , Buenos Aires: Panamericana
dc.descriptionDe Luca, C.J., (1985) Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. 5 ed, , Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins
dc.descriptionFloyd, W.F., Silver, P.H.S., The functions of the eretores spinae muscles in certain movements and postures in man (1955) Journal Physiology, 129, pp. 184-203
dc.descriptionGonçalves, M., Cerqueira, E.P., Levantamento manual de carga em diferentes níveis de altura, com e sem o uso de cinto: Estudo eletromiográfico (1996), Tese de Doutorado. Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas da Universidade de São PauloGray, H., (1977) Anatomia. 29 ed, p. 83. , Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan
dc.descriptionJonsson, B., The functions of individual muscles in the lumbar of part of the spinae muscle (1970) Electromyography, 10, pp. 5-21
dc.descriptionKippers, V., Parker, A.W., Postural related to myoelectric silence of erectors spinae during flexion (1984) Spine, 9 (9), pp. 740-745
dc.descriptionKumar, S., Narayan, Y., Zedka, A., An electromyographic study of unresisted trunk rotation with normal velocity among healthy subjects (1996) Spine, 21 (13), pp. 1500-1512
dc.descriptionLee, C., Minatami, H., Ju, K., Wakano, K., Onishi, S., Yamasaki, H., Fatigue evaluation of lumbar muscles during repeated dynamic trunk exercise (1996) Electromyographic and Clinical Neurophysiology, (36), pp. 237-245
dc.descriptionMasseli, M.R., Camargo, A.M., Berzin, F., Electromyographic study of the longissimus dorsi and iliocostalis lumborum muscles during knee flexion and extension on a plain and on a tilt Roman table (1994) Electromyographic and Clinical Neurophysiology, (34), pp. 309-314
dc.descriptionPortnoy, H., Morin, F., Electromyographic study of postural in various positions and movements (1956) Am. J. Physiol., 186, pp. 122-126
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleElectromyography Response Of The Iliocostalis Lumborum Muscle During Flexion, Extension And Rotation Movements Of The Trunk In Orthostatic And Seated Position
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución