The Brazilian Version Of Start Back Screening Tool - Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation And Reliability

dc.creatorPilz B.
dc.creatorVasconcelos R.A.
dc.creatorMarcondes F.B.
dc.creatorLodovichi S.S.
dc.creatorMello W.
dc.creatorGrossi D.B.
dc.date2014
dc.date2015-06-25T17:51:40Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:09:22Z
dc.date2015-06-25T17:51:40Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:09:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:09:55Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:09:55Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierBrazilian Journal Of Physical Therapy. Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia, v. 18, n. 5, p. 453 - 461, 2014.
dc.identifier14133555
dc.identifier10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0028
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84908507633&partnerID=40&md5=5b50fca8f945bcfc51398337ef2b1142
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/86129
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/86129
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84908507633
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1241219
dc.descriptionBackground: Psychosocial factors are not routinely identified in physical therapy assessments, although they can influence the prognosis of patients with low back pain. The “STarT Back Screening Tool” (SBST) questionnaire aids in screening such patients for poor prognosis in the primary care setting and classifies them as high, medium, or low risk based on physical and psychosocial factors. Objectives: This study sought to translate and cross-culturally adapt the SBST to the Brazilian Portuguese language and test the reliability of the Brazilian version. Method: The first stage of the study consisted of the translation, synthesis, and back-translation of the original version of the STSB, including revision by the Translation Group, pretest of the translated version, and assessment by an expert panel. The pre-final Brazilian version was applied to 2 samples comprising 52 patients with low back pain; these patients were of both genders and older than 18 years of age. To assess the instrument’s reliability, an additional sample comprising 50 patients was subjected to 2 interviews, and the results were assessed using the quadratic weighted kappa value. The instrument’s internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha (n=105), and the standard error of measurement was also calculated (n=50). Results: Translation and back-translation attained consensus, and only item 6 required changes; the reformulated version was applied to an additional sample comprising 52 individuals who did not report any doubts related to this item. The reliability of the SBST-Brazil was 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.95), the internal consistency was 0.74 for the total score and 0.72 for the psychosocial subscale, and the standard error of measurement was 1.9%. Conclusion: The translated and cross-culturally adapted SBST-Brazil proved to be reliable for screening patients according to their risk of poor prognosis and the presence of psychosocial factors.
dc.description18
dc.description5
dc.description453
dc.description461
dc.descriptionHoy, D., Bain, C., Williams, G., March, L., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain (2012) Arthritis Rheum, 64 (6), pp. 2028-2037. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.34347, PMid:22231424
dc.descriptionvan Tulder, M., Becker, A., Bekkering, T., Breen, A., del Real, M.T., Hutchinson, A., Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care (2006) Eur Spine J, 15 (S2), pp. S169-S191. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-1071-2, PMid:16550447
dc.descriptionApeldoorn, A.T., Bosselaar, H., Ostelo, R.W., Blom-Luberti, T., van der Ploeg, T., Fritz, J.M., Identification of patients with chronic low back pain who might benefit from additional psychological assessment (2012) Clin J Pain, 28 (1), pp. 23-31. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31822019d0, PMid:21677570
dc.descriptionNicholas, M.K., Depression in people with pain: There is still work to do. Commentary on ‘Understanding the link between depression and pain’ (2011) Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 2 (2), pp. 45-46. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.02.003
dc.descriptionLinton, S.J., Shaw, W.S., Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain (2011) Phys Ther, 91 (5), pp. 700-711. , http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100330, PMid:21451097
dc.descriptionNicholas, M.K., Mental disorders in people with chronic pain: An international perspective (2007) Pain, 129 (3), pp. 231-232. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.03.011, PMid:17451878
dc.descriptionAiraksinen, O., Brox, J.I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain (2006) Eur Spine J, 15 (S2), pp. S192-S300. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1, PMid:16550448
dc.descriptionNicholas, M.K., Linton, S.J., Watson, P.J., Main, C.J., Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: A reappraisal (2011) Phys Ther, 91 (5), pp. 737-753. , http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100224, The “Decade of the Flags” Working Group, PMid:21451099
dc.descriptionPincus, T., Burton, A.K., Vogel, S., Field, A.P., A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain (2002) Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 27 (5), pp. E109-E120. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017, PMid:11880847
dc.descriptionHill, J.C., Fritz, J.M., Psychosocial influences on low back pain, disability, and response to treatment (2011) Phys Ther, 91 (5), pp. 712-721. , http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100280, PMid:21451093
dc.descriptionFoster, N.E., Thomas, E., Bishop, A., Dunn, K.M., Main, C.J., Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care (2010) Pain, 148 (3), pp. 398-406. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.002, PMid:20022697
dc.descriptionFritz, J.M., Beneciuk, J.M., George, S.Z., Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain (2011) Phys Ther, 91 (5), pp. 722-732. , http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100109, PMid:21451094
dc.descriptionMain, C.J., Sowden, G., Hill, J.C., Watson, P.J., Hay, E.M., Integrating physical and psychological approaches to treatment in low back pain: The development and content of the STarT Back trial’s ‘high-risk’ intervention (StarT Back
dc.descriptionISRCTN 37113406) (2012) Physiotherapy, 98 (2), pp. 110-116. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2011.03.003, PMid:22507360
dc.descriptionHill, J.C., Dunn, K.M., Lewis, M., Mullis, R., Main, C.J., Foster, N.E., A primary care back pain screening tool: Identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment (2008) Arthritis Rheum, 59 (5), pp. 632-641. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.23563, PMid:18438893
dc.descriptionBeneciuk, J.M., Bishop, M.D., Fritz, J.M., Robinson, M.E., Asal, N.R., Nisenzon, A.N., The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: Evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings (2013) Phys Ther, 93 (3), pp. 321-333. , http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120207, PMid:23125279
dc.descriptionWideman, T.H., Hill, J.C., Main, C.J., Lewis, M., Sullivan, M.J.L., Hay, E.M., Comparing the responsiveness of a brief, multidimensional risk screening tool for back pain to its unidimensional reference standards: The whole is greater than the sum of its parts (2012) Pain, 153 (11), pp. 2182-2191. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.06.010, PMid:22800410
dc.descriptionHill, J.C., Vohora, K., Dunn, K.M., Main, C.J., Hay, E.M., Comparing the STarT back screening tool’s subgroup allocation of individual patients with that of independent clinical experts (2010) Clin J Pain, 26 (9), pp. 783-787. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f18aac, PMid:20842014
dc.descriptionHill, J.C., Whitehurst, D.G.T., Lewis, M., Bryan, S., Dunn, K.M., Foster, N.E., Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): A randomised controlled trial (2011) Lancet, 378 (9802), pp. 1560-1571. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9, PMid:21963002
dc.descriptionBeaton, D.E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., Ferraz, M.B., Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures (2000) Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25 (24), pp. 3186-3191. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014, PMid:11124735
dc.descriptionNusbaum, L., Natour, J., Ferraz, M.B., Goldenberg, J., Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire—Brazil Roland-Morris (2001) Braz J Med Biol Res, 34 (2), pp. 203-210. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2001000200007, PMid:11175495
dc.descriptionMokkink, L.B., Terwee, C.B., Patrick, D.L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P.W., Knol, D.L., The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010) J Clin Epidemiol, 63 (7), pp. 737-745. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006, PMid:20494804
dc.descriptionSalaffi, F., Sarzi-Puttini, P., Ciapetti, A., Atzeni, F., Clinimetric evaluations of patients with chronic widespread pain (2011) Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 25 (2), pp. 249-270. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.004, PMid:22094200
dc.descriptionLauridsen, H.H., Hartvigsen, J., Manniche, C., Korsholm, L., Grunnet-Nilsson, N., Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients (2006) BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 7 (1), p. 82. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-82, PMid:17064410
dc.descriptionTerwee, C.B., Bot, S.D.M., De Boer, M.R., Van Der Windt, D.A., Knol, D.L., Dekker, J., Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2007) J Clin Epidemiol, 60 (1), pp. 34-42. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012, PMid:17161752
dc.descriptionSim, J., Wright, C.C., The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements (2005) Phys Ther, 85 (3), pp. 257-268. , PMid:15733050
dc.descriptionBeaton, D.E., Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness (2000) Spine, 25 (24), pp. 3192-3199. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00015, PMid:11124736
dc.descriptionMagalhães, M.O., Costa, L.O., Ferreira, M.L., Machado, L.A., Clinimetric testing of two instruments that measure attitudes and beliefs of health care providers about chronic low back pain (2011) Rev Bras Fisioter, 15 (3), pp. 249-256. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000300012, PMid:21829990
dc.descriptionMarcondes, F.B., Vasconcelos, R.A., Marchetto, A., Andrade, A.L.L., Zoppi Filho, A., Etchebehere, M., Tradução e adaptação cultural do Rowe Score para a língua portuguesa (2012) Acta Ortop Bras, 20 (6), pp. 346-350. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522012000600007, PMid:24453630
dc.description(2013) North Staffordshire: The STarT Back Screening tool website [Internet], , http://www.keele.ac.uk/sbst/translatedversions, Keele.ac.uk, [cited 2014 March 27]. Available from
dc.descriptionBruyère, O., Demoulin, M., Beaudart, C., Hill, J.C., Maquet, D., Genevay, S., Validity and reliability of the French Version of the STarT back screening tool for patients with low back pain (2014) Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 39 (2), pp. E123-E128. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000062, PMid:24108286
dc.descriptionAzimi, P., Shahzadi, S., Azhari, S., Montazeri, A., A validation study of the Iranian version of STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) in lumbar central canal stenosis patients (2014) J Orthop Sci, 19 (2), pp. 213-217. , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0506-y, PMid:24343300
dc.languageen
dc.publisherRevista Brasileira de Fisioterapia
dc.relationBrazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleThe Brazilian Version Of Start Back Screening Tool - Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation And Reliability
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución