Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: positive predictive value of categories 3, 4 and 5. A systematic literature review

dc.creatorKestelman, Fabíola Procaci
dc.creatorSouza, Gustavo Antônio de
dc.creatorThuler, Luiz Claudio
dc.creatorMartins, Gabriela
dc.creatorFreitas, Vivianne Aguilera Rolim de
dc.creatorCanella, Ellyete de Oliveira
dc.date2007-06-01
dc.date2014-07-17T19:11:59Z
dc.date2015-11-26T11:57:47Z
dc.date2014-07-17T19:11:59Z
dc.date2015-11-26T11:57:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:00:37Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:00:37Z
dc.identifierRadiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 40, n. 3, p. 173-177, 2007.
dc.identifier0100-3984
dc.identifierS0100-39842007000300008
dc.identifier10.1590/S0100-39842007000300008
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842007000300008
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842007000300008
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/28908
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/28908
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1238834
dc.descriptionOBJECTIVE: To review the literature about the positive predictive value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) categories 3, 4 and 5. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A research was performed in the online Medline database, entering the terms predictive value and BI-RADS. Eleven studies were included in this review. RESULTS: The positive predictive values ranged respectively between 0% and 8%, 4% and 62%, and 54% and 100% for BI-RADS® categories 3, 4 and 5. Three studies have also evaluated morphological criteria with higher positive predictive value in mammography, mass with spiculated margins being the finding with highest positive predictive value for malignancy. CONCLUSION: A high variability was found in the reviewed literature among positive predictive values of BI-RADS® categories 3, 4 and 5, although methodological differences have been identified, limiting the comparative analysis.
dc.descriptionOBJETIVO: Avaliar artigos, na literatura, que verificam o valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5 do Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®). MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi realizada pesquisa na base de dados Medline utilizando os termos predictive value e BI-RADS. Foram incluídos 11 artigos nesta revisão. RESULTADOS: O valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5 variou entre 0% e 8%, 4% e 62%, 54% e 100%, respectivamente. Três artigos avaliaram, concomitantemente, os critérios morfológicos das lesões que apresentaram maior valor preditivo positivo na mamografia, sendo nódulo espiculado o critério com maior valor preditivo positivo. CONCLUSÃO: Houve grande variabilidade do valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5 do BI-RADS® em todos os estudos, porém foram identificadas diferenças metodológicas que limitaram a comparação desses estudos.
dc.description173
dc.description177
dc.languagept
dc.publisherColégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.relationRadiologia Brasileira
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceSciELO
dc.subjectMamografia
dc.subjectBI-RADS®
dc.subjectCâncer de mama
dc.subjectMammography
dc.subjectBI-RADS®
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.titleBreast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5. revisão sistemática da literatura
dc.titleBreast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: positive predictive value of categories 3, 4 and 5. A systematic literature review
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución