The logics of formal inconsistency (LFIs, for short) are paraconsistent logics (i.e. logics containing contradictory but nontrivial theories) having a consistency connective which allows to recover the ex falso quodlibet ...

The aim of this paper is to explore the peculiar case of infectious logics, a group of systems obtained generalizing the semantic behavior characteristic of the (¬, ∧, ∨) -fragment of the logics of nonsense, such as the ...

In 1986, Mikenberg et al. introduced the semantic notion of quasi-truth defined by means of partial structures. In such structures, the predicates are seen as triples of pairwise disjoint sets: the set of tuples which ...

In this paper, I will argue that Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs) can be used as very sophisticated and powerful methods of classical recapture. I will compare LFIs with the well-known non-monotonic logics by Batens ...

The classical recovery is an important result for non-classical logics and for the para- consistent programs in particular. Nevertheless, the main problem with some non-classical logics and with paraconsistency is its ...

Reasoning and change over inconsistent ontologies (i-ont(s)) is of utmost relevance in sciences like medicine and law. Argumentation may be an appropriate formalism to cope with both problems: (reasoning) through an ...