Buscar
Mostrando ítems 1-10 de 3881
Caracterizando el desacuerdo lógico.
(2015-06-30)
En este artículo, ofrezco una caracterización del desacuerdo lógico. Según
mi noción, los desacuerdos meramente verbales en lógica son inusuales.
La mayoría de los desacuerdos lógicos son simplemente desacuerdos
descriptivos ...
Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
(Philosophy Documentation Center, 2015-12)
This paper argues for the following three claims. First, the Agrippan mode from disagreement does not play a secondary role in inducing suspension of judgment. Second, the Pyrrhonist is not committed to the criteria of ...
Disagreement About Scientific Ontology
(Springer, 2020-02)
In this paper, I analyze some disagreements about scientific ontology as cases of disagreement between epistemic peers. I maintain that the particularities of these cases are better understood if epistemic peerhood is ...
Investor disagreement: the modern approach
(2015-04-27)
Disagreement between economists is a well know fact. However, it took a long time for this concept to be incorporated in economic models. In this survey, we review the consequences and insights provided by recent models. ...
DISCLOSURE OF DISAGREEMENT AND OBEDIENCE IN PARENT-ADOLESCENT RELATIONSHIP: RELATIONS WITH AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR AND SELF-CONCEPT
(SOC MEXICANA PSICOLOGIA, 2009)
The study approaches adolescent behavior toward disagreement with parents, combining expression of disagreement and obedience and considering its relation with well-being dimensions such as adolescent's perception of own ...
Learning from scientific disagreementAprendiendo del desacuerdo científico
(Universidad del País Vasco, 2021-04)
The article addresses the question of how should scientific peers revise their beliefs (if at all) upon recognized disagreement. After presenting the basics of peer disagreement in sections 1 and 2, we focus, in section ...
Remembering stories together: Social contagion and the moderating influence of disagreements in conversations
(Elsevier, 2013-12)
Although remembering often occurs with conversations, the effects of its pragmatics on memory are rarely examined. We studied the effect of two pragmatic factors: (1) the presence of disagreeing and (2) the level of ...
Remembering stories together: Social contagion and the moderating influence of disagreements in conversations
(Universidad de Belgrano. Facultad de Humanidades. Proyectos de Investigación, 2013)
Although remembering often occurs with conversations, the effects of its pragmatics on memory are
rarely examined. We studied the effect of two pragmatic factors: (1) the presence of disagreeing and
(2) the level of ...
Analytical categories to describe deficit attributions in deep disagreements between citizens and experts
(2021)
Disagreements often arise from citizen-expert collaboration, as both agents share a different epistemic worldview. Fogelin, following Wittgenstein, proposed that some disagreements (i.e. deep disagreements) cannot be ...
Groups, normativity and disagreement
(2013)
We are members of many groups to which we ascribe the performance of intentional actions, and belonging to these groups seems to give rise, in many cases, to special normative relations. For instance, as a member of the ...