Dung's argumentation frameworks have been applied for over twenty years to the analysis of argument justification. This representation focuses on arguments and the attacks among them, abstracting away from other features ...

Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plausible opinions about which arguments should be accepted, rejected or deemed undecided. We study the problem of how multiple such judgements can be aggregated. ...

In this work we present a formal model for collaborative argumentation based dialogues by combining an abstract dialogue framework with a formalism for dynamic argumentation. The proposed model allows any number of agents ...

Given the importance of modelling in mathematics classrooms, and despite the extensive body of research on teacher support for promoting the mathematical modelling cycle in the classroom, authors have overlooked how teacher ...

In Dungs seminal work, an argumentation framework was defined by a set of abstract arguments and a binary (and also abstract) relation between these arguments, called attack relation and expressing conflicts between ...

Many authors emphasise the contributions of argumentation to science teaching, the relationship between teachers practice and students argumentation, and the importance of teaches role in generating and conducting argumentative ...

Learners are increasingly required to analyze critically information presented in languages other than their first to form reasoned opinions and solve problems. It is thus urgent to develop their argumentation skills, ...

We studied the use of methodological pluralism in physics classes for the improvement of secondary school students' scientific argumentation, in the heartland of Sao Paulo state. The research was carried out during a ...

The article shares the proposal of an analytical rubric as a strategy for the assessment and monitoring of learning outcomes in students who develop an argumentative plot from the mathematics field, to solve any problem ...