masterThesis
Exploring the influence of flipped learning strategy on tenth graders writing process at two public schools in Bogota: A route towards differentiation
Fecha
2017-08-16Registro en:
Anderson, G. L., Nihlen, A. S., & Herr, K. (2007). Studying Your Own School: An
Educator's Guide to Practitioner Action Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.
Anillo, J. (2016). Differentiated Instruction Improving EFL Reading Comprehension and
autonomy for Young Learners (Master’s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana
Badger, R. and White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT
journal. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/Jaime/Downloads/54-2-6.pdf
Barfield, A., Toogood, S., & Pemberton, R. (2009). Maintaining Control: Autonomy and
Language Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Horlow;
Longman/Pearson Education
Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in Language teaching and learning: State of art. Institute of
Education. Cambridge University Press. Hong Kong.
Benson, P. (2009). Making sense of autonomy in language learning. In S. Toogood, R.
Pemberton & A. Barfield, Maintaining control: Autonomy and language learning,
(p, 13-26). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University press.
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class
every day. USA: International Society for Technology in Education. ISTE
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to students’ engagement.
USA: ISTE.
Bishop, J. & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: a survey of the research.
Atlanta: American society for Engineering Education
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain
Brandvik, M. (1990). Writing process: activities kit. USA: The Center for Applied
Research in Education.
Bueno, Y. (2016). Thinking, crafting and commenting: an approach to improving paragraph
structure writing. (Published Master’s Thesis). Universidad de la Sabana. Chía,
Colombia.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for
practitioners. Routledge.
Carbaugh, E. & Doubet, K. (2016). The differentiated Flipped Classroom: A practical
guide to digital learning. Corwin Press.
Caro, M. (2014). EFL Learners’ Process Writing and the Implementation of Prewrite
Learning Objects When Creating Short Narrative Compositions (Master’s thesis).
Universidad de la Sabana
Casallas, W. & Garcia, J. (2016). Differentiated Instruction and Oral Tiered Activities to
Impact A1 Students’ English Level in a Multilevel Classroom (Master’s thesis).
Universidad de la Sabana
Cohen, L. Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
London
Cohen, L. Lawrence, M. &Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education.
Routledge. London and New York
Council of Europe, (2001). Common European Framework of reference for languages:
Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press Syndicate of the University
of Cambridge.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating
Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approach. SAGE publications. University of Nebraska- Lincoln
Crouch, C. & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience as results.
Harvard University. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Donzel, C. (2014). Improving B1 third graders Writing Skills through The Process Writing
Approach. (Published Master’s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana. Colombia
Engin, M. (2014). Extending the flipped classroom model: Developing second language
writing skills through student-created digital videos. Journal
of the scholarship of teaching and learning, 12-26.
Ferrance, E (2000). Action Research. Northeast and Islands Regional Educational
Laboratory. Brown University.
Forsey, M.; Low, M. & Glance, D. (2013). Flipping the sociology classroom: Towards a
practice of online pedagogy. Journal of Sociology, 471-485.
Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student
learning. Leading and learning with technology, 12-17.
Garay, N. & Torregrosa, T. (2016). The development of listening skill and autonomous
behaviors through the implementation of flipped learning approach. (Published
Master’s Thesis). Universidad de la Sabana. Chía, Colombia.
Garnica, V. & Torres, M. (2015). An approximation to writing process through the
implementation of a Process-Genre Approach in a blended learning environment.
(Published Master’s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana. Colombia.
Gregory, G. & Chapman, C. (2007). Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One size
doesn't fit all. Corwin Press. USA
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. UK: Pearson Education
Limited
Huang, J. (2013). Autonomy, Agency and Identity in Foreign Language Learning and
Teaching. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang AG.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From methods to
postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. USA
Kyriacou, C. (2009). Effective teaching in schools: Theory and practice. UK: Nelson
Thornes Ltd.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to
creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education (31),
30-43
Langan, J. (2009). Exploring writing, Sentences and Paragraphs. Atlantic cape Community
College. Mc Graw Hill.
Lennon, P. (2012). Learner Autonomy in the English Classroom: Empirical Studies and
Ideas for Teachers. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang AG
Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal
of family Medicine and Primary Care. India
Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin:
Authentik.
Little, D. (1994). Learner Autonomy: A theoretical construct and its practical application.
Die Neueren Sprachen.
Mackey, A. and Gass, S. (2005). Second Language Research: methodology and design.
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. USA.
Mills, G. (2007). Action Research: A guide for the teacher researcher, 3rd. Edition. Upper
Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). 2006. Guía 22: Formar en lenguas extranjeras:
inglés. ¡El reto!: Lo que necesitamos saber y saber hacer. Estándares Básicos de
Competencias en lenguas extranjeras: inglés. Colombia
Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). 2016. Anexo11: Basic learning Rights: 6th to
11th grades. Colombia Bilingüe. Colombia
O’Hair, D. & Kreps, G. (1990). Applied communication theory and research. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Inc. USA.
Ortega, L. (2013). Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge. USA
Rodriguez-Buitrago, C. & Diaz, J. (Forthcoming). Flipping your writing lessons:
Optimizing time in your EFL writing classroom. In J. Mehring, & A. Leis (Eds.),
Innovations in flipped learning in the language classroom: Theories and practice. New York, NY: Spring
Saxby, K. 2011. KET for schools TRAINER. Cambridge University Press
Spivey, B. (2006). What is the writing process? Super-duper Publications.
Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated Instruction: A research basis. International
Educational Journal, 935-947.
Tomlinson, C. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational
Leadership, 12-16.
Tomlinson, C. (2005). Quality curriculum and instruction for highly able students. Theory
into practice, 160-166
Tomlinson, C. (2014). Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners.
USA: ASCD.
Tomlinson, C., & Doubet, K. (2005). Reach them to teach them. Educational Leadership,
8-15
Tomlinson, C. & Kalbfleisch, L. (1998). Teach me, teach my brain: A call
for differentiated classrooms. Educational Leadership, 52-55.
265557
TE09213
Autor
Hernández Herrera, Andrea Paola
Institución
Resumen
Esta investigación acción examinó el impacto de la enseñanza invertida y diferenciada en el proceso de escritura en inglés. El estudio se realizó con alumnos de nivel de inglés A1 en grado décimo de dos colegios públicos de Bogotá, quienes demostraron dificultades con el vocabulario y la organización de ideas al producir textos escritos. Muy pocos estudios se han realizado en el contexto colombiano sobre el efecto de las estrategias de aprendizaje invertido en la escritura, en diferenciación y en el proceso de escritura, pero se han aplicado principalmente a nivel universitario. Por esta razón, no fue posible encontrar ningún estudio anterior en el que todos estos factores estuvieran integrados en el desarrollo de la escritura a nivel escolar. Los datos fueron recogidos mediante una prueba de escritura de entrada y una de salida, cuestionarios (encuestas de análisis de necesidades y encuesta final), artefactos de los alumnos (dos productos escritos resultantes de talleres de proceso de escritura) y registros escritos de las docentes investigadoras los cuales fueron analizados a través del método de la teoría fundamentada. Después de analizar los datos, se evidenció que la enseñanza diferenciada e invertida ayudó a mejorar la escritura de los estudiantes ya que hubo una mejora notable en la calidad, complejidad y claridad de sus textos escritos. La implementación de esta estrategia contribuyó en el desempeño de profesores y alumnos, el interés de los estudiantes por el aprendizaje del inglés y el fomento de la autonomía en los alumnos