masterThesis
Promoting three reading strategies (scanning, skimming and making predictions) to foster autonomy
Fecha
2013-12-13Registro en:
Aguirre, J., & Ramos, B. (2009). Guidance in reading strategies: A first step
--towards autonomy learning in a semi-distance education program. PROFILE 11.
Bogotá, Colombia.
Almasi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic reading processes. New York:
Guilford Press.
Alderson, J. (2000). Assessing Reading. United Kingdom: Cambridge
University Press.
Anderson, N.J (1999). Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and
Strategies. Toronto: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
Arhar, J. M., Holly, M. L., & Kasten, W. C. (2001). Action research for
teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice
Hall.
Barnhardt, S., Chamot, A., El-Dinary, P, and Robbins, J. (1999). The
learning Strategies Handbook. New York: Longman.
Benson, P. and Voller, P. (eds) (1997) Autonomy and Independence in
Language Learning. Hong Kong: Longman Group.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language
learning. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited
Boud, D. (1988). Developing Student Autonomy in Learning. London: Kogan
Page.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language
Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research. A Guide for Practitioners. New
York: USA, Routledge.
Bruner, J. (1973) Beyond the information given; studies in the psychology of
knowing. New York. Norton
Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? ARAL,
21(1), 1-20
Cohen, L. Manion, I. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education.
(6th ed.) London: Routledge Falmer.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbin, J., & Strauss A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded
theory. Procedures and techniques. London: Sage publications.
Corbin , J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd
ed.).Thousand Oaks: Publications.
Correales, R., Mendivelso, O & Santacruz F. (2000): Reading
Comprehension: A Viable Challenge for Public School Students. PROFILE, Issues
in Teachers' Professional Development, 1, 38-41.
Cortes, M., Sanchez, L. (2005). Profiles of Autonomy in the Field of Foreign
Languages. Profile (online). n.6, pp. 133-140. ISSN 1657-0790
Cotterall, S. (1995). Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy. ELT
Journal, 49, 3, 219-227.
Cotterall, S. & Crabbe, D. (1999). Learner Autonomy in Language Learning:
Defining the Field and Effecting Change. Frankfurt and Main: Peter Lang GmbH.
Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language
classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self
Determination in Human Behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Dickinson, L. (1992). Learner autonomy 2: Learner training for language
learning. Dublin: Authentik Language Resources, Ltd.
Dickinson, L. (1995). ‘Autonomy and motivation: A literature review.’ System
23/2: 165- 74.
Gaona. G. E.; Suárez L. I; González H. C (2001) Becoming an Efficient
Reader: A Proposal for a School Curriculum. Profile Issues in Teachers’
Professional Development, Vol 2, No 1.
Gardner, R. (1983). Learning another language: A true social psychology
experiment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 219-240.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood,
NJ: Ablex.
Grabe, W., Stoller, F. (2002).Teaching and Researching Reading. Malaysia:
Longman Pearson Education.
Greenall, S. and Swan, M. (1986). Effective Reading: Reading Skills for
Advanced Students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grellet, F. (1996). Developing Reading Skills: A practical guide to reading
comprehension exercises. Cambridge University Press.
Greenwood, J. (1998). Class Readers. Hongkong: Oxford University Press.
Guilloteaux, M. & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A
Classroom-Oriented Investigation of the Effects of Motivational Strategies on
Student Motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 1. 55-77.
Gustafson, K. (1996). Instructional Design Models. In T. Plomp & D. P. Ely
(Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, Second Edition.
New York: Elsevier
Guthrie, J., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. and Cox, K. (1999). Motivational and
cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies
of Reading, 3: 231-56.
Hedge, T. (2003). Teaching and Learning in the Language. Classroom, New
York: Oxford University Press
Holec, H., (1981): Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford:
Pergamon. (First published 1979, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.)
Jiménez, P. (2000).Teaching Reading Strategies. Colombia: Universidad
Externado de Colombia.
Kerr, (2009). Skimming, scanning and inferring in reading. LCPJ.
Komiyama, K. (2009). Car: A means for motivating students to read. English
Teaching Forum Number 3.
Legutke, M. and H. Thomas. (1991) Process and Experience in the
Language Classroom. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Lessard C, M (1997). Language Learning Strategies: An Overview for L2
Teachers. The Internet TESL Journal 3 (3), pp 34 – 37.
Little, D. (1991) Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin:
Authentik.
Loughran, J. (2002) Teacher as researcher: The PAVOT Project. Crows
Nest, NSW
Lü c K, K. (2008). Web-based Foreign Language Reading: Affective and
Productive Outcomes. University of California, Davis.
Luna, M., & Sánchez, D. (2005). Profiles of Autonomy in the Field of Foreign
Languages. Profile 6, 133-140: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Matsubara, J., & Lehtinen (2007). Promoting autonomy in a reading
classroom. Kanda University of International Studies, China Japan
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2004). Qualitative data analysis: An
expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of
reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25 (3), 2-10.
Nolen, A.L. & Vander Putten, J. (2007). Action Research in Education:
Addressing Gaps in Ethical Principles and Practices, Educational Researcher,
36(7):401-407.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston:
Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Nuttall, C. (1982). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. London:
Heinemann
Nuttall, C. (1996).Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford:
Heinemann.
Oxford, R.L. and Nyikos, M. 1989: Variables affecting choice of language
learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal 73, 291-
300.
Oxford, R.L (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every teacher
should know. New York: Newbury House.
Ozek, Y., & Civelek, Muharrem (2006). A Study on the Use of Cognitive
Reading Strategies by ELT Students. Dicle University, Turkey
Pennycook, A. (1997) ‘Cultural Alternatives and Autonomy’ in: P. Benson
and Voller (eds.) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning P. 35- 53
Harlow: Longman.
Perdomo, C. M. (2001). An Approach to Making Students Autonomous
Readers of the English Language. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional
Development. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Pressley, M., Beard El-Dinary, P., & Brown, R. (1992). Skilled and not-soskilled reading: Good information processing and not-so-good information
processing. In M. Pressley, K.
Rios, S., & Valcárcel, A. (2005) Reading: A Meaningful Way to Promote
Learning English in High School. Profile 6, 59- 72: Universidad Nacional de
Colombia.
Sau. C., M (n.d). Teaching Students to Read More Effectively. Action
research in teaching. Hong Kong
Shahidullah, M. 1995-96. “Product and Process View of Reading and Their
Pedagogical Implications”. Rajshahi University Studies. Part-A. Vol. 23-24. pp.
209-230
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An
overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.
273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stern P. and Porr, C. (2010).Essentials of Accessible Grounded Theory.
Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.
Sugirin, (1999). Exploring the comprehension strategies of EFL readers: A
multi-method study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 428- 548)
Takase, A. (2007). Japanese high school students’ motivation for extensive
L2 reading. Kansai University.
Urquhart, S. and Weir, C. 1998. Reading in a Second Language: Process,
Product and practice. London: Longman
Wallace. M. J. (2002). Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the eプects of intrinsic
motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research
Quarterly, 39, 162- 186
Williams, E. (1996). Reading in the Language Classroom. Malaysia: Modern
English Publications.
Xiaoxia, Q. (2005). Helping EFL learners become autonomous readers:
Self-access through metacognition. CELEA Journal. Zhejian Gongshang
University
Zhang, L. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students´ metacognitive
knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language
Awareness, 10(4), 268-288.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive
perspective. In M. Boeckaerts, et al. (Eds.), Handbook on self-regulation.
Directions and challenges for future research (pp. 13-39). San Diego: Academic
Press.
255684
TE06055
Autor
Jiménez, Sonia Stella
Institución
Resumen
En este artículo se reportan los resultados de un proyecto de investigación-acción llevado a cabo en un colegio público rural en Gachetá, Cundinamarca, Colombia, con estudiantes de noveno grado. El propósito de este estudio fue determinar el impacto de tres estrategias de lectura en inglés (scanning, skimming and making predictions) para promover la autonomía y la compresión lectora. La primera estrategia se refiere a saber hallar información específica en un texto, la segunda hace referencia a identificar la idea principal de un texto, y la tercera a la capacidad de predecir el posible contenido de un texto. La recolección de datos incluyó el uso de una lista de verificación inicial para el estudiante, un cuestionario para cada estrategia vista, un reporte de auto evaluación para el docente, y una lista de verificación al finalizar el proyecto para los estudiantes, con el objetivo de analizar si los estudiantes mejoraron su autonomía y comprensión lectora. Adicionalmente, se administró un test a los estudiantes con el fin de constatar si hubo avances en la comprensión de lectura. Los resultados evidenciaron que los estudiantes adquirieron algunos rasgos de autonomía tales como tomar decisiones para aprender y hacer sus tareas asignadas, ser más conscientes de su proceso de lectura, y estar más motivados para el aprendizaje. Asimismo, la capacitación referente a las estrategias de lectura les permitió a los estudiantes mejorar su comprensión lectora. Se puede concluir que estas estrategias de lectura son herramientas que le sirven al estudiante para su formación en autonomía.