Uncertainties over emerging technologies and their potential effect on society and the environment often lead to controversy between scientists, policymakers and the public. Opening up the debates and involving citizens and social scientists early in the process of developing new technology is one way of responding to this issue of governance. By doing so, the hope is that the ethical implications and acceptability of new science can be more carefully considered and framed in a responsible and democratised context. To explore an example of aspiration in practice, a series of interdisciplinary public engagement events was organised at Durham University under the title New Storylines for Living with Environmental Change: Citizens' Perspectives. In this commentary we report on one of these events, a one-day workshop entitled Responsible Science and Public Engagement, where a citizens' panel aimed to explore ways of conducting deliberative engagement with scientists using the creative arts and a scientific dilemmas café format. © 2013 Royal Geographical Society.18018388Anderson, D.G., (2000) Identity and ecology in arctic Siberia: The number one reindeer brigade, , Oxford University Press, OxfordBrace, C., Geoghegan, H., Human geographies of climate change: landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges (2010) Progress in Human Geography, 35, pp. 284-302Bucchi, M., Neresini, F., Science and public participation (2008) The handbook of science and technology studies, pp. 449-472. , Hackett E J, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M and Wajcman J eds MIT Press, Cambridge MA and London -Callon, M., An essay on framing and overflowing (1998) The laws of the markets, pp. 244-269. , Callon M ed Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review, Oxford and MaldenCallon, M., The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge (1999) Science, Technology and Society, 4, pp. 81-94Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthe, Y., (2009), Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy Burchell G trans MIT Press, Cambridge MACallon, M., Law, J., Rip, A., How to study the force of science (1986) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology, pp. 3-15. , Callon M, Law J and Rip A eds Macmillan Press, Basingstoke and London -(2001) Social nature: theory, practice and politics, , Castree N and Braun B eds Blackwell, Oxford and MaldenCrang, M., Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see? (2003) Progress in Human Geography, 27, pp. 494-504Davies, G., Burgess, J., Eames, M., Mayer, S., Staley, K., Stirling, A., Williamson, S., (2003), www.deliberative-mapping.org/papers/dm-wellcome.pdf, Deliberative mapping: appraising options for addressing 'the Kidney Gap' Wellcome Trust final report Accessed 18 April 2013Davies, S.R., How we talk when we talk about nano: the future in laypeople's talk (2011) Futures, 43, pp. 317-326Engdahl, E., Lidskog, R., Risk, communication and trust: towards an emotional understanding of trust (2012) Public Understanding of Science, , doi: 10.1177/0963662512460953Gabrys, J., Yusoff, K., Arts, sciences and climate change: practices and politics at the threshold (2012) Science as Culture, 21, pp. 1-24Geoghegan, H., Leyson, C., On climate change and cultural geography: farming on the Lizard Peninsula Cornwall, UK (2012) Climactic Change, 113, pp. 55-66Hawkins, H., Geography and art. An expanding field: site, the body and practice (2012) Progress in Human Geography, 37, pp. 52-71Heidegger, M., (1962), Being and time Macquarrie J and Robinson E trans Basil Blackwell, OxfordHeidegger, M., (1971), Poetry, language, thought Hofstadter A trans Harper and Row, New YorkHilgartner, S., (2000) Science on stage: expert advice as public drama, , Stanford University Press, Stanford CAHoffmann-Reim, H., Wynne, B., In risk analysis one has to admit ignorance (2002) Nature, 416, p. 123(2000) Science and society, , House of Lords The Stationery Office, LondonIngold, T., (2000) The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, , Routledge, London and New YorkIrwin, A., The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance (2006) Social Studies of Science, 36, pp. 299-320Irwin, A., Wynne, B., (2003) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology, , University of Cambridge Press, CambridgeIrwin, A., Elgaard Jensen, T., Jones, K.E., The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice (2012) Social Studies of Science, 43, pp. 118-135Joss, S., Public participation in science and technology policy- and decision-making - ephemeral phenomenon or lasting change? (1999) Science and Public Policy, 26, pp. 290-293Kearnes, M., Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P., Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B., From bio to nano: learning lessons from the UK agricultural biotechnology controversy (2006) Science as Culture, 15, pp. 291-307Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P., Wilsdon, J., (2006) Governing at the nano-scale: people, policies and emerging technologies, , www.demos.co.uk/files/governingatthenanoscale.pdf, Demos, London Accessed 18 April 2013Lane, S.N., Odoni, N., Landström, C., Whatmore, S.J., Ward, N., Bradley, S., Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method (2011) Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, pp. 15-36Last, A., Experimental geographies (2012) Geography Compass, 6, pp. 706-724Last, A., Mutable matter - exploring nanotechnological futures through sensory methods (2012) Leonardo, 45, pp. 132-139Latour, B., (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy, , Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA and LondonLatour, B., Weibel, P., (2005) Making things public: atmospheres of democracy, , MIT Press, Cambridge MALeach, M., Scoones, I., Wynne, B., Introduction: science, citizenship and globalization (2005) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement, pp. 3-14. , Leach M, Scoones I and Wynne B eds Zed Books, London and New York -Macnaghten, P., Chilvers, J., Governing risky technologies (2012) Critical risk research: practices, politics and ethics, pp. 99-124. , Kearnes M B, Klauser F R and Lane S N eds Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester -Macnaghten, P., Guivant, J.S., Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom (2011) Public Understanding of Science, 20, pp. 207-220Macnaghten, P.M., Kearnes, M.B., Wynne, B., Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? (2005) Science Communication, 27, pp. 268-291Macnaghten, P., Szerszynski, B., Living the global social experiment: an analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance (2013) Global Environmental Change, 23, pp. 465-474Miles, M., Representing nature: art and climate change (2010) Cultural Geographies, 17, pp. 19-35(1979) Technology on trial: public participation in decision-making related to science and technology, , OECD OECD, ParisPickering, A., (2010) The cybernetic brain: sketches of another future, , University of Chicago Press, Chicago and LondonPielke, R.A., (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge(1998) Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 21st Report: setting environmental standards, , RCEP HMSO, LondonRogers, A., Geographies of the performing arts: landscapes, places and cities (2012) Geography Compass, 6, pp. 60-75Rose, G., (2012) Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, , Sage, London(2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties, , Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering The Royal Society, LondonSaunders, A., Moles, K., The spatial practice of public engagement: 'doing' geography in the South Wales valleys (2013) Social and Cultural Geography, 14, pp. 23-40Sykes, K., Macnaghten, P., Responsible innovation - opening up dialog and debate (2013) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, pp. 85-107. , Owen R, Bessant J and Heintz M eds John Wiley and Sons, Chichester -Tolia-Kelly, D.P., The geographies of cultural geography II: visual culture (2012) Progress in Human Geography, 36, pp. 135-142Whatmore, S.J., Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise (2009) Progress in Human Geography, 33, pp. 587-598Wilsdon, J., Willis, R., (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream, , Demos, LondonWynne, B., Elephants in the rooms where publics encounter 'science'? A response to Darrin Durant, 'Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public' (2008) Public Understanding of Science, 17, pp. 21-33van Est, R., The broad challenge of public engagement in science: commentary on 'Constitutional moments in governing science and technology' (2011) Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, pp. 639-648Yusoff, K., Biopolitical economies and the political aesthetics of climate change (2010) Theory, Culture and Society, 27, pp. 73-99Yusoff, K., Gabrys, J., Climate change and the imagination Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (2011) Climate Change, 2, pp. 516-534