dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorde Faria-Júnior, Norberto Batista
dc.creatorde Loiola, Livia Etchebehere
dc.creatorGuerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria
dc.creatorBerbert, Fábio Luis Camargo Villela
dc.creatorTanomaru-Filho, Mário
dc.date2014-05-27T11:25:52Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:33:54Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:25:52Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:33:54Z
dc.date2011-05-13
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:50:25Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:50:25Z
dc.identifierBrazilian Dental Journal, v. 22, n. 1, p. 41-44, 2011.
dc.identifier0103-6440
dc.identifier1806-4760
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/72423
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/72423
dc.identifier10.1590/S0103-64402011000100007
dc.identifierS0103-64402011000100007
dc.identifier2-s2.0-79955758924.pdf
dc.identifier2-s2.0-79955758924
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402011000100007
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/893294
dc.descriptionThis study evaluated the effectiveness of 3 solvents (Citrol orange oil, Eucalyptol and Tetrachloroethylene) and 2 associations of solvents (Citrol orange oil+Tetrachloroethylene and Eucalyptol+Tetrachloroethylene) on 3 types of gutta-percha (conventional, thermoplastic and EndoREZ) and Resilon. Ten discs (10 mm diameter x 1 mm thick) from each material were prepared using standard metallic molds. Each specimen was weighed to determinate its initial mass. The specimens were immersed in the solvents for 10 min, followed by immersion in distilled water for 20 min, and were then reweighed to obtain the final mass. The mean weight loss determined the solvent capacity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. Tetrachloroethylene was the most effective on conventional gutta-percha (p<0.05). Tetrachloroethylene was also the most effective on thermoplastic gutta-percha, but it was not significantly different (p>0.05) from Eucalyptol+Tetrachloroethylene, Citrol+Tetrachloroethylene, and Citrol. All solvents and associations presented little effectiveness on Resilon. The association Eucalyptol+Tetrachloroethylene was the most effective on EndoREZ, but it did not differ significantly (p>0.05) from Citrol+Tetrachloroethylene and Tetrachloroethylene. All evaluated substances presented solvent action. Tetrachloroethylene improved the effectiveness of both Citrol and Eucalyptol.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectGutta-percha
dc.subjectResilon
dc.subjectRetreatment
dc.subjectSolvent
dc.subjectcineole
dc.subjectcyclohexanol derivative
dc.subjectEndoRez
dc.subjectgutta percha
dc.subjectorange oil
dc.subjectresilon sealer
dc.subjectresin
dc.subjectroot canal filling material
dc.subjectsolvent
dc.subjectterpene
dc.subjecttetrachloroethylene
dc.subjectvegetable oil
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectdental debonding
dc.subjectdrug combination
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectretreatment
dc.subjectComposite Resins
dc.subjectCyclohexanols
dc.subjectDental Debonding
dc.subjectDrug Combinations
dc.subjectGutta-Percha
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectMonoterpenes
dc.subjectPlant Oils
dc.subjectRoot Canal Filling Materials
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparation
dc.subjectSolvents
dc.subjectTetrachloroethylene
dc.titleEffectiveness of three solvents and two associations of solvents on gutta-percha and Resilon
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución