dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.creator | Mesquita, A. M. | |
dc.creator | Ozcan, M. | |
dc.creator | Souza, R. O. | |
dc.creator | Kojima, A. N. | |
dc.creator | Nishioka, R. S. | |
dc.creator | Kimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu | |
dc.creator | Bottino, M. A. | |
dc.date | 2014-05-27T11:24:43Z | |
dc.date | 2016-10-25T18:28:48Z | |
dc.date | 2014-05-27T11:24:43Z | |
dc.date | 2016-10-25T18:28:48Z | |
dc.date | 2010-07-01 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-06T01:41:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-06T01:41:55Z | |
dc.identifier | Minerva stomatologica, v. 59, n. 7-8, p. 393-399, 2010. | |
dc.identifier | 0026-4970 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71770 | |
dc.identifier | http://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/71770 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-79952798721 | |
dc.identifier | http://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/minerva-stomatologica/article.php?cod=R18Y2010N07A0393 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/892703 | |
dc.description | This study compared the bond strength durability of a feldspathic veneering ceramic to glass-infiltrated reinforced ceramics in dry and aged conditions. Disc shaped (thickness: 4 mm, diameter: 4 mm) of glass-infiltrated alumina (In-Ceram Alumina) and glass-infiltrated alumina reinforced by zirconia (In-Ceram Zirconia) core ceramic specimens (N=48, N=12 per groups) were constructed according to the manufacturers' recommendations. Veneering ceramic (VITA VM7) was fired onto the core ceramics using a mold. The core-veneering ceramic assemblies were randomly divided into two conditions and tested either immediately after specimen preparation (Dry) or following 30000 thermocycling (5-55 oC±1; dwell time: 30 seconds). Shear bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (cross-head speed: 1 mm/min). Failure modes were analyzed using optical microscope (x20). The bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed using ANOVA (α=0.05). Thermocycling did not decrease the bond strength results for both In-Ceram Alumina (30.6±8.2 MPa; P=0.2053) and In-Ceram zirconia (32.6±9 MPa; P=0.3987) core ceramic-feldspathic veneering ceramic combinations when compared to non-aged conditions (28.1±6.4 MPa, 29.7±7.3 MPa, respectively). There were also no significant differences between adhesion of the veneering ceramic to either In-Ceram Alumina or In-Ceram Zirconia ceramics (P=0.3289). Failure types were predominantly a mixture of adhesive failure between the veneering and the core ceramic together with cohesive fracture of the veneering ceramic. Long-term thermocycling aging conditions did not impair the adhesion of the veneering ceramic to the glass-infiltrated alumina core ceramics tested. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Minerva stomatologica | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | glass | |
dc.subject | In Ceram Alumina | |
dc.subject | In Ceram Zirconia | |
dc.subject | In-Ceram Alumina | |
dc.subject | In-Ceram Zirconia | |
dc.subject | VITA VM7 | |
dc.subject | ceramics | |
dc.subject | comparative study | |
dc.subject | dental bonding | |
dc.subject | denture | |
dc.subject | equipment | |
dc.subject | evaluation | |
dc.subject | heat | |
dc.subject | humidity | |
dc.subject | in vitro study | |
dc.subject | materials testing | |
dc.subject | randomization | |
dc.subject | shear strength | |
dc.subject | time | |
dc.subject | tooth prosthesis | |
dc.subject | Ceramics | |
dc.subject | Dental Bonding | |
dc.subject | Dental Porcelain | |
dc.subject | Dental Veneers | |
dc.subject | Equipment Failure | |
dc.subject | Glass | |
dc.subject | Hot Temperature | |
dc.subject | Humidity | |
dc.subject | Materials Testing | |
dc.subject | Random Allocation | |
dc.subject | Shear Strength | |
dc.subject | Time Factors | |
dc.title | Durability of feldspathic veneering ceramic on glass-infiltrated alumina ceramics after long-term thermocycling. | |
dc.type | Otro | |