dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorBraoios, A.
dc.creatorPizzolitto, Antonio Carlos
dc.date2014-05-27T11:21:14Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:20:18Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:21:14Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:20:18Z
dc.date2004-12-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T01:11:46Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T01:11:46Z
dc.identifierRevista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas, v. 25, n. 1, p. 41-45, 2004.
dc.identifier0101-3793
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68056
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/68056
dc.identifier2-s2.0-27444439542
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/889438
dc.descriptionA hundred and ninety-five (195) strains of Enterobacter spp., isolated from diverse clinical specimens - urine, feces, cateter, blood, wound, tracheal aspirate, vaginal fluid - were submitted to the conventional identification by biochemical tests, and were also submitted to the identification by panels NegCombo 20 of the system automated MicroScan - AutoScan- 4 (Dade Behring Inc., West Sacramento, CA, USA). The samples were from patients of the Clinical Laboratory from the School of Pharmacy and Biochemistry of UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SP, and from patients hospitalized at the University Hospital Domingos Leonardo Cerávolo, UNOESTE. Of the total of strains tested, 191 (97.9%) presented agreement between the two approaches utilized and 4 strains (2.1%) presented identification disagreement, that is, the genus identified was different in each approach. By this study, the conclusion is that both the approaches utilized for the identification presented advantages and disadvantages related to the cost, facility of execution, quickness, reliability and some other characteristics. Even so, our results showed that conventional methods represent a reliable tool for Enterobacter identification.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationRevista de Ciencias Farmaceuticas
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAutomated identification
dc.subjectBiochemical identification
dc.subjectEnterobacter
dc.subjectEnterobacteriaceae
dc.subjectMicroscan
dc.subjectbacterial strain
dc.subjectbacterium detection
dc.subjectbacterium identification
dc.subjectbacterium isolate
dc.subjectbacterium isolation
dc.subjectblood
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectfeces analysis
dc.subjectgenus
dc.subjectintermethod comparison
dc.subjectlaboratory automation
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjecttracheobronchial toilet
dc.subjectuniversity hospital
dc.subjecturine
dc.subjecturine catheter
dc.subjectvagina discharge
dc.subjectwound
dc.titleIdentificação de Enterobacter spp. através de técnicas convencionais e do sistema semi-automatizado Microscan (Autoscan-4)
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución