A test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation

dc.contributorMaldonado Chaparro, Adriana Alexandra
dc.creatorCardona-Restrepo, Manuela Cardona
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-18T19:30:09Z
dc.date.available2023-05-18T19:30:09Z
dc.date.created2023-05-18T19:30:09Z
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/38846
dc.description.abstractSpatial proximity is a factor that facilitates the formation of social relationships. Here, I evaluated whether spatial proximity promotes the development of low-cost relationships and whether these favor the formation of cooperative relationships (high-cost relationships). To do this, I used 23 guinea pigs distributed in six enclosures controlling for familiarity between group members. The experiment consisted of three treatments that were evaluated in three phases.In treatment A individuals could freely interact in a shared foraging arena;In treatment B individuals were forced to share the foraging arena and in the control group, individuals were not allowed to share. The results suggest that spatial proximity facilitates the development of low-cost foraging relationships. The strength of foraging relationships increased over time, a phenomenon that was more evident when individuals were allowed to freely decide whether toshare space with other individuals. Additionally, pairs that form strong foraging relationships were more likely to develop high-cost relationships. In conclusion, spatial proximity, especially voluntary proximity, promotes the formation of low-cost social relationships, and these in turn favor the formation of cooperative relationships.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias Naturales
dc.publisherBiología
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rightsRestringido (Temporalmente bloqueado)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.sourceAncillotto, L., Serangeli, M. T., & Russo, D. (2012). Spatial proximity between newborns influences the development of social relationships in bats. Ethology, 118(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.02016.x
dc.sourceAschwanden, J., Gygax, L., Wechsler, B., & Keil, N. M. (2008). Social distances of goats at the feeding rack: Influence of the quality of social bonds, rank differences, grouping age and presence of horns. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114(1–2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.02.002
dc.sourceAsher, M., de Oliveira, E. S., & Sachser, N. (2004). Social system and spatial organization of wild guinea pigs (Cavia aperea) in a natural population. Journal of Mammalogy, 85(4), 788– 796. https://doi.org/10.1644/BNS-012
dc.sourceBarclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. December 2006, 749–753. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0209
dc.sourceBerghänel, A., Ostner, J., Schröder, U., & Schülke, O. (2011). Social bonds predict future cooperation in male Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Animal Behaviour, 81(6), 1109– 1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.009
dc.sourceByrne, N., Heinonen, K., & Jussila, I. (2015). The role of proximity in value preferences: A study of consumer co-operatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(2), 339– 361. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12079
dc.sourceCarter, G. G., Farine, D. R., Crisp, R. J., Vrtilek, J. K., Ripperger, S. P., & Page, R. A. (2020). Development of New Food-Sharing Relationships in Vampire Bats. Current Biology, 30(7), 1275-1279.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.055
dc.sourceDal Pesco, F., & Fischer, J. (2018). Greetings in male Guinea baboons and the function of rituals in complex social groups. Journal of Human Evolution, 125, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.007
dc.sourceDi Bitetti, M. S. (1997). Evidence for an important social role of allogrooming in a platyrrhine primate. Animal Behaviour, 54(1), 199–211. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9268450
dc.sourceFirth, J. A., & Sheldon, B. C. (2015). Experimental manipulation of avian social structure reveals segregation is carried over across contexts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1802). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2350
dc.sourceGable, S. L., & Bromberg, C. (2018). Healthy social bonds: A necessary condition for wellbeing. Handbook of Well-Being, 15. Retrieved from https://nobascholar.com/chapters/65/download.pdf
dc.sourceHinde, R. A. (1976). Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure. 70(1), 1–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2800384
dc.sourceKaburu, S. S. K., & Newton-Fisher, N. E. (2013). Social instability raises the stakes during social grooming among wild male chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 86(3), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.06.003
dc.sourceKajokaite, K., Whalen, A., Koster, J., & Perry, S. (2022). Social integration predicts survival in female white-faced capuchin monkeys. Behavioral Ecology, 33(4), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac043
dc.sourceKern, J. M., & Radford, A. N. (2021). Strongly bonded individuals prefer to forage together in cooperatively breeding dwarf mongoose groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03025-0
dc.sourceKirk, J., & Wascher, C. A. F. (2018). Temporal modification of social interactions in response to changing group demographics and offspring maturation in African lions (Panthera leo). Behavioural Processes, 157, 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.06.006
dc.sourceKutsukake, N., Suetsugu, N., & Hasegawa, T. (2006). Pattern, distribution, and function of greeting behavior among black-and-white colobus. International Journal of Primatology, 27(5), 1271–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-006-9072-x
dc.sourceLee, N. S., & Beery, A. K. (2022). Selectivity and Sociality: Aggression and Affiliation Shape Vole Social Relationships. In Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (Vol. 16). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.826831
dc.sourceMajolo, B., Schino, G., & Aureli, F. (2012). The relative prevalence of direct, indirect and generalized reciprocity in macaque grooming exchanges. Animal Behaviour, 83(3), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.026
dc.sourceMercier, S., Neumann, C., van de Waal, E., Chollet, E., Meric de Bellefon, J., & Zuberbühler, K. (2017). Vervet monkeys greet adult males during high-risk situations. Animal Behaviour, 132, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.07.021
dc.sourceMolm, L. D. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119– 131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510369079
dc.sourceNishida, T. (1970). Social behavior and relationship among wild chimpanzees of the Mahali mountains. Primates, 11(1), 47–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730675
dc.sourceOksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O'Hara R, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, De Caceres M, Durand S, Evangelista H, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill M, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette M, Ribeiro Cunha E, Smith T, Stier A, Ter Braak C, Weedon J (2022). _vegan: Community Ecology Package_. R package version 2.6-4, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
dc.sourceOstner, J., & Schülke, O. (2014). The evolution of social bonds in primate males. Behaviour, 151(7), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003191
dc.sourceOttoni, E. B., Izar, P., & Resende, B. D. (2004). Social Play and Spatial Tolerance in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella). Revista de Etologia, 6(1), 55–61.
dc.sourceRamos, A., Bousquet, C. A. H., & Sueur, C. (2021). How leadership could be used to manage domestic and wild ungulate herds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 239(April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105326
dc.sourceRands, S. A., Cowlishaw, G., Pettifor, R. A., Rowcliffe, J. M., & Johnstone, R. A. (2003). Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs. Nature, 423(6938), 432– 434. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01630
dc.sourceRazik, I., Brown, B. K. G., & Carter, G. G. (2022). Forced proximity promotes the formation of enduring cooperative relationships in vampire bats. Biology Letters, 0–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0056
dc.sourceRoberts, G., & Sherratt, T. N. (1998). Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature, 394(6689), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1038/28160
dc.sourceSalvador, C. H., & Fernandez, F. A. S. (2008). Population dynamics and conservation status of the insular cavy Cavia intermedia (Rodentia: Caviidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 89(3), 721– 729. https://doi.org/10.1644/07-MAMM-A-0088R1.1
dc.sourceSantos-Silva, B., Hanazaki, N., Daura-Jorge, F. G., & Cantor, M. (2022). Social foraging can benefit artisanal fishers who interact with wild dolphins. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 76(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03152-2
dc.sourceSchülke, O., Bhagavatula, J., Vigilant, L., & Ostner, J. (2010). Social bonds enhance reproductive success in male macaques. Current Biology, 20(24), 2207–2210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.058
dc.sourceSilk, J. B., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2003). Social Bonds of Female Baboons Enhance Infant Survival. Science, 302(5648), 1231–1234. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1088580
dc.sourceSilk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2009). The benefits of social capital: Close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1670), 3099–3104. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0681
dc.sourceSilk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2010). Strong and consistent social bonds enhance the longevity of female baboons. Current Biology, 20(15), 1359–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.067
dc.sourceSmith, J. E., Powning, K. S., Dawes, S. E., Estrada, J. R., Hopper, A. L., Piotrowski, S. L., & Holekamp, K. E. (2011). Greetings promote cooperation and reinforce social bonds among spottedhyaenas. AnimalBehaviour, 81(2), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.007
dc.sourceStopka, P., & Graciasová, R. (2001). Conditional allogrooming in the herb-field mouse. Behavioral Ecology, 12(5), 584–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.5.584
dc.sourceTrillmich, F., Sötemann, C., & Clara, M. (2007). Age at maturity in cavies: Are precocial mammals different? Ecoscience, 14(3), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.2980/1195- 6860(2007)14[300:AAMICA]2.0.CO;2
dc.sourceWillis, F. N., Levinson, D. M., & Buchanan, D. R. (1977). Development of Social Behavior in the Guinea Pig. The Psychological Record, 27(3), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0339447
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectAcicalamiento
dc.subjectCuys
dc.subjectRelaciones cooperativas
dc.subjectRelaciones de forrajeo
dc.subjectRedes sociales
dc.subjectSaludos
dc.titleA test of spatial proximity as driver for social bond formation
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución