dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:29:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T16:52:15Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:29:06Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T16:52:15Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T15:29:06Z
dc.date.issued2005-06-01
dc.identifierJournal of Periodontology. Chicago: Amer Acad Periodontology, v. 76, n. 6, p. 908-914, 2005.
dc.identifier0022-3492
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/38767
dc.identifier10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.908
dc.identifierWOS:000229953600006
dc.identifier8399870097572073
dc.identifier9831236034935598
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3910026
dc.description.abstractBackground: the purpose of this study was to histologically evaluate the healing of experimental dehiscence defects after surface demineralization with tetracycline hydrochloride.Methods: Six adult male monkeys (Cebus apella) were used in this study. Dehiscence defects were surgically created on the buccal aspect of the mandibular lateral incisors in all animals. The root surfaces were debrided and planed. In a split-mouth design, a 10% tetracycline hydrochloride solution was applied to one tooth for 4 minutes (T group), followed by irrigation with saline. The contralateral tooth served as a control (C group). The flaps were repositioned and sutured. The animals were sacrificed at 6 months postoperatively and histological sections were processed. Computer-assisted histomorphometric analysis was used to evaluate the formation of new cementum, new bone, new connective tissue attachment, and length of the epithelium (junctional and sulcular).Results: Bone regeneration was similar in both groups (1.5 +/- 0.3 mm for the T group and 1.5 +/- 0.6 mm for the C group). The C group showed more new cementum than the T group (2.3 +/- 0.3 mm versus 2.2 +/- 0.3 mm) as well as a longer epithelium (1.0 +/- 0.3 mm versus 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm). The T group presented more new connective tissue attachment (3.1 +/- 0.2 mm) than the C group (2.9 +/- 0.6 mm). However, no statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups.Conclusions: the amount of new attachment was similar in both groups. Root conditioning with 10% tetracycline solution did not produce any additional new attachment in comparison to the controls.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAmer Acad Periodontology
dc.relationJournal of Periodontology
dc.relation3.392
dc.relation1,408
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectanimal studies
dc.subjectbone, demineralized
dc.subjectperiodontal attachment
dc.subjectperiodontal regeneration
dc.subjecttetracycline/therapeutic use
dc.subjecttooth/anatomy and histology
dc.titleHealing of dehiscence defects following root surface demineralization with tetracycline: A histologic study in monkeys
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución