dc.creatorAmaro de Oliveira Fleck
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-07T18:10:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T22:42:16Z
dc.date.available2021-12-07T18:10:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T22:42:16Z
dc.date.created2021-12-07T18:10:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1590/0100-512X2017n13701am
dc.identifier1981-5336
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/38821
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-7710-9141
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3808717
dc.description.abstract: Theodor W. Adorno’s late critical theory is often regarded as quietist and resignated. This article seeks to question this verdict through an analysis of both the diagnosis of time made by the author as of the relationship between theory and praxis outlined in Frankfurtian thinker’s late works. It is suggested that instead of resigned, Adorno’s critical theory is engaged either in processes of resistance to the latent barbarism, whether in specific improvements that could be achieved within the existing order. This engagement, however, does not mean a mitigation of the thesis that the possibility of emancipation would be blocked.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherFAF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationKriterion
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectTheodor W. Adorno
dc.subjectTeoria crítica
dc.subjectTeoria e praxis
dc.subjectFilosofia política contemporânea
dc.titleResignação? Práxis e política na teoria crítica tardia de Theodor W.
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución