Frecuencia de cáncer en pacientes con ecografía mamaria BI-RADS 4A

dc.creatorGuío, José Ismael
dc.creatorGarcía, Óscar A.
dc.creatorBuitrago, Maryury Liliana
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T20:38:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T12:37:10Z
dc.date.available2015-09-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-02-21T20:38:14Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T12:37:10Z
dc.date.created2015-09-01 00:00:00
dc.date.created2022-02-21T20:38:14Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-01
dc.identifier10.31260/RepertMedCir.v24.n3.2015.620
dc.identifier0121-7372
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2510
dc.identifier2462-991X
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v24.n3.2015.620
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3595892
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherSociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Hospital de San José y Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud
dc.relationAbdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology. 2009 sep; 252(3): 665-72.
dc.relationAmerican College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1995.
dc.relationKerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Frankel SD, Ominsky SH, Sickles EA, et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic rpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Dec 2; 90(23):1801-9.
dc.relationRaza S, Goldkamp AL, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL. US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management. Radiographics. 2010 Sep; 30(5):1199-213.
dc.relationGarcia Angulo OA, Guio Avila JI. Frecuencia de patología mamaria maligna en pacientes con mamografia BIRADS 4A. Rev Colomb Radiol. 2011 Dic; 22(4): 3352-6.
dc.relationStavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995 Jul; 196(1):123-34.
dc.relationLee HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Youk JH, Lee JY, Kang DR. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8.
dc.relationJales RM, Sarian LO, Torresan R, Marussi EF, Alvares BR, Derchain S. Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS – US 4 breast masses. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Aug; 82(8):1231-5.
dc.relationLazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicón for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology. 2006 May; 239(2):385-91.
dc.relationChala L, Endo E, Kim S, de Castro F, Moraes P, Cerri G, et al. Gray-scale sonography of solid breast masses: diagnosis of probably benign masses and reduction of the number of biopsies. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007 Jan; 35(1):9-19.
dc.relationRinaldi P, Ierardi C, Costantini M, Magno S, Giuliani M, Belli P, et al. Cystic breast lesions. Sonographic findings and clinical management. J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Nov; 29(11):1617-26.
dc.relationVenta LA, Kim JP, Pelloski CE, Morrow M. Management of complex breast cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Nov; 173(5):1331-6.
dc.relationBerg WA, Campassi CI, Ioffe OB. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic pathologic correlation. Radiology. Apr; 227(1):183-91.
dc.relationAmerican College of Radiology (2003). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System® (BI-RADS®) Atlas.. 5th ed.: Reston, VA.; (2003).
dc.relationPerrot N, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Frey I, Thomassin-Naggara I, Chopier J. US-guided core needle biopsy: false-negatives. How to reduce them?. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Mar; 82(3):424-6.
dc.relationSchueller G SWCHT. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radio. 2008 Sep; 18(9):1761-73.
dc.relationFlowers CI, O’Donoghue C, Moore D, Goss A, Kim D, Kim JH, et al. Reducing false-positive biopsies: a pilot study to reduce benign biopsy rates for BI-RADS 4A/B assessments through testing Risk stratification and new thresholds for intervention. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(3):769-77.
dc.relationHong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5.
dc.relationhttps://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/download/620/656
dc.relationNúm. 3 , Año 2015 : Julio – Septiembre
dc.relation226
dc.relation3
dc.relation220
dc.relation24
dc.relationRevista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugía
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightsFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS - 0
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/620
dc.subjectecografía mamaria
dc.subjectmamografía
dc.subjectBI-RADS 4A
dc.subjectcáncer de mama
dc.subjectbreast ultrasound
dc.subjectmammography
dc.subjectBI-RADS 4A
dc.subjectbreast cancer
dc.titleFrecuencia de cáncer en pacientes con ecografía mamaria BI-RADS 4A
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typeJournal article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución