Un análisis comparativo entre la relación de distribución de ingreso y la integración económica regional en Asia Oriental y América Latina

A comparative analysis between the relation of income distribution and economic regional integration in East Asia and Latin America

dc.creatorOspina-Enciso, Ángela Jeaneth
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-21T21:20:49Z
dc.date.available2013-05-21T21:20:49Z
dc.date.created2013-05-21T21:20:49Z
dc.date.issued2011-06
dc.identifierOspina-Enciso, Á. J. (2011). Un análisis comparativo entre la relación de distribución de ingreso y la integración económica regional en Asia Oriental y América Latina. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica, Vol. 3 (1) Recuperado de http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/RFYPE/article/view/532/553
dc.identifier2248-6046
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10983/641
dc.description.abstractEste trabajo analiza la relación entre la desigualdad y la integración económica regional de facto durante las últimas dos décadas en América Latina y la región de Asia Oriental y el Pacífico, centrándose en las exportaciones intrarregionales. La globalización ha sido considerada como una causa de desigualdad. Sin embargo, los modelos de promoción de exportaciones son asociados con altas tasas de crecimiento económico. Los modelos de promoción de exportaciones han sido más dinámicos en Asia Oriental que en América Latina, a través del desarrollo de redes de suministro de bienes intermedios y finales. Las preguntas de investigación exploran la relación entre desigualdad y los patrones del comercio intra-regional de facto. El análisis empírico hace uso de un panel de datos con efectos fijos, con una matriz de covarianza consistente ante heterocedasticidad. Los resultados muestran que los incrementos en comercio intra-regional están asociados con una reducción de la desigualdad, más en la región de Asia Oriental y el Pacífico que en América Latina. La contribución de este trabajo es la introducción del comercio intra-regional como un nuevo factor que es asociado negativamente a la desigualdad
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses the relationship between inequality and de facto regional economic integration during the last two decades in Latin America and East Asia Pacific regions, focusing on intra-regional exports. Globalization has been considered as a driving of inequality, although export-led growth models are associated with high economic growth rates. Export-led growth models have been more dynamic in East Asia than in Latin America, through the development of supply chain networks of intermediate and final goods. Research questions explore the relation between inequality and patterns of de facto intra-regional trade. Empirical analysis uses a fixed effects panel data with Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent (HAC) covariance matrix. Results showed that increments in regional intra-trade are associated with reductions of inequality, more in East Asia Pacific than in Latin America. The contribution of this paper is the introduction of intra-regional trade as a new factor that is negatively associated with inequality
dc.languagespa
dc.relationRevista Finanzas y Política Económica, Vol. 3, no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2011); p. 107-124
dc.relationAndean Community of Nations (ACN). (2010). Estadísticas. Sector Externo. Retrieved from http://www.comunidadandina.org/estadisticas/documentos_indicadores.htm
dc.relationAsian Development Bank, ABD. (2010a). Outlook 2010 Update: The future growth in Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
dc.relationAsian Development Bank, ABD. (2010b). The Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2010. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
dc.relationAssociation of Southeast Asian Nations, ASEAN. (2010). External Trade Statistics, Table 18, Intra- and extra-ASEAN trade. Retrieved from http://www.aseansec.org/18137.htm
dc.relationBarrell R. and Choy A. (2003). Economic integration and openness in Europe and East Asia. Mimeo, NIESR.
dc.relationBeckfield, J. (2006, December). European Integration and Income Inequality. American Sociological Association, 71(6), 964-985.
dc.relationBirchenall, J. A., (2001, October). Income distribution, human capital and economic growth in Colombia.Journal of Development Economics, 66(1), 271-287.
dc.relationBourguignon, F. and Morrison, C. (2002, September). Inequality among World Citizens: 1820-1992. American Economic Review, 92(4), 727-744.
dc.relationCEDLAS and The World Bank (2010). Data retrieved October 2010 from Socio-Economic Database for Latin America and the Caribbean (Sedlac).
dc.relationCornia, G. A. & Court, J. (2001). Inequality, Growth and Poverty in the Era of Liberalization and Globalization.(Policy Brief No. 4). Helsinki: The United Nations University, World Institute for Developing Economic Research, WIDER.
dc.relationCornia, G. A. & Kiiski, S. (2001). Trends of Income Distribution in the Post-World War II Period. (Discussion Paper No. 2001/89). Helsinki: The United Nations University, World Institute for Developing Economic Research, WIDER.
dc.relationDeininger, K. and Squire, L. (1998). New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57, 259–287.
dc.relationDollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2001). Trade, Growth, and Poverty. (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2615). Washington: World Bank.
dc.relationEconomic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, ECLAC. (2010). Síntesis: La Hora de la Igualdad: brechas por cerrar, caminos por abrir. Brasilia: CEPAL. Retrieved from http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones/xml/4/39714/2010-225-SES.33-SINTESIS_La_hora_ de_la_igualdad-PRESS.pdf
dc.relationFeenstra, R. (1998). Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 31-50.
dc.relationHarris, J. R. & Todaro, M.P. (1970). Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis. The American Economic Review, 60(1), 126-142.
dc.relationHausmann, R. & Székel, M. (1999). Inequality and the Family in Latin America. (Working Paper # 393). Washington: Inter- American Development Bank, IDB.
dc.relationInternational Monetary Fund, IMF. (2007).Globalization and Inequality. In World Economic Outlook. (Chapter 4). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund Publication Services.
dc.relationKimura, F., Takahashi, Y. and Hayakawa, K. (2007). Fragmentation and parts and components trade: Comparison between East Asia and Europe. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance.18, 23-40.
dc.relationKrugman, P. and Venables, A. (2005). Globalization and the inequality of nations. (Working paper No. 5098.). National Bureau of Economic Research.
dc.relationKuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review,45(1), 128.
dc.relationLewis, A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. (, Vol. XXII, pp. 139-191)UK: The Manchester School.
dc.relationLitchfield, J. A. (1999). Inequality, Methods and Tools. World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources. worldbank.org/INTPGI/Resources/Inequality/litchfie.pdf
dc.relationLondoño, J. L. &Székely, M. (2000). Persistent poverty and excess inequality: Latin America, 1970-1995. Journal of Applied Economics, 3(1), 93-134.
dc.relationLópez-Calva, L. F. and Lusting, N. (2010). Declining inequality in Latin America: a decade of progress?. (pp. 1-24). New York: United Nations Development Program.
dc.relationMilanovic, B. &Yitzhaki, S. (2002, June). Discomposing World Income Distribution: Does the world have a middle class?.Review of Income and Wealth, 48(2).
dc.relationMilanovic, B. (2005). Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality. United States of America: Princeton University Press.
dc.relationMisas, G. (2002). La ruptura de los 90 del gradualismo al colapso. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relationNicolas, F. (2008). The political economy of regional integration in East Asia.Economic Change and Restructuring, 41(4), 345-367.
dc.relationNicolas, F. (2008). The political economy of regional integration in East Asia.Economic Change and Restructuring, 41(4), 345-367.
dc.relationOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries..Paris: OECD Publications
dc.relationPerry, G. and Olearreaga (2006, January). Trade Liberalization, Inequality and Poverty Reduction in Latin America. (Paper presented at ABCDE). Saint Petersburg.
dc.relationRavallion, M. & Chen, S. (1997, May). What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?.World Bank Economic Review, 11(2),, 357-82.
dc.relationSoomer, J. (2003). Why Regional Integration Benefits. Retrievedfrom http://www.eccb-centralbank.org/PDF/newspaper3.pdf.
dc.relationTeVelde, D. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Latin America. London: Overseas Department Institute.
dc.relationUnited Nations Conference on Trade and Development, UNCTAD. (2009). Handbook of Statistics 2009. 48-49.
dc.relationUnited Nations University & World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) (2008, May). Data retrieved November 2010, from World Income Inequality Database (WIID), Version 2.0c.
dc.relationUrata, S. (2008). Institutionalization of Regional Economic Integration in East Asia. (Working Paper, Waseda University Global CEO Program, GIARI). Tokyo: International Academic Printing Co.Ltd.
dc.relationWei, S. & Wu, J. (2002). Globalization and Inequality Without Differences in Data Definition, Legal System and Other Institutions. Retrieved from http://team.univ-paris1.fr/teamperso/DEA/Cursus/M2R/DocM2Rouverturecroissance/wei%20and%20wu%20globalization%20inequality%20china.pdf
dc.relationWooldridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. (Fourth Edition). Mason (OH): South-Western Cengage Learning
dc.relationWorld Bank. (1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationWorld Bank. (2010). Data retrieved November 2010, from World Development Indicators Online (WDI) database.
dc.relationWorld Trade Organization, WTO. (2010). World trade developments in 2009. (Table I.4. Intra- and inter-regional merchandise trade, 2009. p. 3.). Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2010_e/its10_world_trade_dev_e.pdf
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightsDerechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2011
dc.subjectDESIGUALDAD DE INGRESOS
dc.subjectINTEGRACIÓN ECONÓMICA REGIONAL DE FACTO
dc.subjectEXPORTACIONES INTRA-REGIONALES
dc.subjectMATRIZ DE VARIANZAS Y COVARIANZAS
dc.subjectHETEROCEDASTICIDAD
dc.subjectINCOME INEQUALITY
dc.subjectDE FACTO ECONOMIC REGIONAL INTEGRATION
dc.subjectINTRA-REGIONAL EXPORTS
dc.subjectHETEROSKEDASTICITY AND AUTOCORRELATION CONSISTENT
dc.subjectCOVARIANCE MATRIX
dc.titleUn análisis comparativo entre la relación de distribución de ingreso y la integración económica regional en Asia Oriental y América Latina
dc.titleA comparative analysis between the relation of income distribution and economic regional integration in East Asia and Latin America
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución