dc.contributorAuler, Décio
dc.contributorhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4708444P6
dc.contributorSantos, Wildson Luiz Pereira dos
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6094379265028380
dc.contributorMuenchen, Cristiane
dc.contributorhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4229240T0
dc.creatorRosa, Suiane Ewerling da
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-05
dc.date.available2014-12-05
dc.date.created2014-12-05
dc.date.issued2014-04-16
dc.identifierROSA, Suiane Ewerling da. NON-NEUTRALITY OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY: QUESTIONING SILECING IN EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES RELATED TO STS (SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-SOCIETY). 2014. 123 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2014.
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7127
dc.description.abstractThe STS movement has as a main objective the democratization of decision-making on social issues involving science-technology (ST). Also, this arises in contexts in which the supposed neutrality of ST began to be questioned. Neutrality understood as legitimizing technocratic decision models. In the educational field, I seek curriculum geared toward to the creation of a culture of participation, based on reference Freire-STS and LATSTS (Latin American Thought in Science Technology Society). As well, my research problem was: Historic Buildings, called myths, in other words, the supposed neutrality / superiority of technocratic decision model, the Salvationist perspective / redeeming attributed to ST and scientific-technological determinism, sustained and feeding back the supposed neutrality have been worked on educational practices related to the Science-Technology-Society? Which referrals have been given? The objectives that guided the research were: i) identify, in educational practices presented in the literature of the area, the approaches given to the three historic buildings; ii) analyze and deepen the featured aspects in regard to the three historic buildings, in a vision of non-neutrality of ST; and iii) signal parameters to Science Education in order to support proposals for educational practices. Methodologically, consisted of a qualitative research, bibliographic nature, being the corpus of analysis consisting of six articles published in journals in the field of Science Education. I used the Textual Discourse Analysis, which resulted in three categories of analysis: a) Silencing on the design of ST may be signaling an endorsement to a close understanding of the scientific-technological determinism; b) Silencing on dimensions other natures, beyond the scientific-technological in decision-making processes; and, c) Silencing about the values internalized in the scientific-technological product.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisherBR
dc.publisherEducação
dc.publisherUFSM
dc.publisherPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Educação
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectCiência-tecnologia-sociedade
dc.subjectPráticas educativas
dc.subjectNão neutralidade da ciência-tecnologia
dc.subjectScience-technology-society
dc.subjectNon-neutrality of science technology
dc.subjectEducational practices and silencing
dc.titleNão neutralidade da ciência-tecnologia: problematizando silenciamentos em práticas educativas relacionadas à CTS
dc.typeDissertação


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución