dc.creatorCarrasco Labra, Alonso
dc.creatorBrignardello Petersen, Romina
dc.creatorAzarpazhooh, Amir
dc.creatorGlick, Michael
dc.creatorGuyatt, Gordon H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:24:50Z
dc.date.available2018-12-20T15:24:50Z
dc.date.created2018-12-20T15:24:50Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierJournal of the American Dental Association, Volumen 146, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 919-924.
dc.identifier00028177
dc.identifier10.1016/j.adaj.2015.08.008
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159125
dc.description.abstractBackground and Overview Clinicians using evidence to inform decisions on a daily basis have access to a number of tools to help them judge the importance of discriminating studies conducted using suboptimal methods from more rigorous ones. Many checklists have been developed to facilitate and guide clinicians to identify and critically appraise clinical studies. However, only limited guidance is available addressing how clinicians can identify misleading claims from those that can be supported reliably by study results. Practical Implications In this final article of a series of 10, the authors provide key concepts that clinicians can use to help them avoid using biased inferences or statements that are "too good to be true."
dc.languageen
dc.publisherAmerican Dental Association
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceJournal of the American Dental Association
dc.subjectevidence-based dentistry
dc.subjectKey Words Results interpretation
dc.subjectmisleading presentation of results
dc.titleA practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: X How to avoid being misled by clinical studies' results in dentistry
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución