Estrategia de intervención militar de Estados Unidos en Medio Oriente: dinámicas y consecuencias del uso de drones en Yemen y Pakistán entre 2009 a 2013

dc.contributorLair, Éric
dc.creatorCorrea Cruz, Nicolás
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T15:23:36Z
dc.date.available2015-12-10T15:23:36Z
dc.date.created2015-12-10T15:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/11558
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_11558
dc.description.abstractThis study comprehends an overview of the military strategy undertaken by the United States in the Middle East through the systematic use of UAV´s between 2009 and 2013. The research is aimed to explain the measure in which Drone warfare can be considered as power projection without a significant degree of vulnerability. The cases of Pakistan and Yemen are analyzed due to the increased number of Targeted Killings authorized by the Obama administration from 2009. Offensive Realism, along with its limitations, is regarded as the pertinent theoretical framework for this study. Hence, it is latter stated that Drone warfare is inherent to the United States hegemony pretention regardless of the legal and political consequences emanated from the violation of Humanitarian International Law.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherRelaciones Internacionales
dc.publisherFacultad de Relaciones Internacionales
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto completo)
dc.rightsAtribución-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.sourceAguiar, P. (2014). Algunas implicaciones del empleo de drones en perspectiva jurídica internacional. En J. Saura (Ed). Impacto del uso de drones en las Relaciones Internacionales y el Derecho internacional contemporáneo. (págs. 121-137). Barcelona: Institut Catalá Internacional Per La Pau.
dc.sourceDonelly, J. (2008). The ethics of Realism. En D. Snidal (Ed) The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, (pág .150-200). London: Oxford Press.
dc.sourceEvangelista, M. (2014). Introduction. En M. Evangelista, y H. Shue (Eds), The American way of bombing, from flying fortresses to drones, (págs. 1-24). New York: Cornell University Press.
dc.sourceEwans, M. (2005). Introduction. En M. Ewans (Ed), Conflict in Afghanistan, studies in asymmetric warfare, (págs.1-5). New York : Routledge.
dc.sourceMearsheimer, J. (2011). Anarchy and the struggle for power. En J. Mearsheimer (Ed), The Tragedy of Great Powe Politics , (págs. .20-43). New York: Norton.
dc.sourceNasser, T. (2015). Questioning the legality of drone strikes and analyzing the response to the international reproach. En T. Nasser (Ed), Modern War Crimes by the United States, (págs. .289-327). Southern California: Southern California University Press.
dc.sourceRashid, A.(2002). Los Talibán. En A. Rashid (Ed), Introducción, los guerreros santones de Afganistán, (págs .18-29). España: Quinteto.
dc.sourceSherman, W. (2002). Naval Aviation. En W. Sherman (Ed), Air Warfare, (págs. 241-270). New York: The Ronald Press Company.
dc.sourceWarren, A. (2014). The Use of Force and the Making of Hegemonic International Law. From Bush to Obama. En S. Croft (Ed), Governing The Use Of Force In International Relations. The Post 9/11 Challenge on International Law, (pág. 134-153). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.sourceAbshire, D. (2011). The Missing Endgame for Afghanistan: A Sustainable Post Bin Laden Strategy. Washington Quarterly. 34 (2). 59- 72.
dc.sourceBuckley, A. (2012). Smiting Spell: The legality of Targeted Killings in the War against Terrorism. Journal of East Asia & International Law, 5 (2) , 439- 454.
dc.sourceyman, D. (2012). Why Drones Work. Foreign Affairs, 4 (92), 5-20.
dc.sourceCohan, J. (2003). The Bush doctrine and anticipatory self-defense in international customary law. Pace International Law Review, 15 (2), 283-351.
dc.sourceCole, J. (200). Afghanistan and Pakistan: Beyond the Taliban. Political Science Quarterly, 124 (2), 37-40
dc.sourceCristol, J. (2009). Morgenthau vs Morgenthau. The six principles of political Realism in context. American Foreign Policy Interests, 31 (4), 238-244.
dc.sourceDalziel, N. (2014). Drone strikes: ethics and strategy. New Zealand International Review, 39 (3), 2-6.
dc.sourceErakat, N. (2014). New Inminence in the time of Obama, The impact of Targeted killings on the Law of Self Defense. Arizona Law Review, 56 (1), 195-248.
dc.sourceMcdonell, M. (2012). Sow what you reap? Using Predator and Reaper Drones to carry out assasinations or targeted killings of suspected terrorists. George Washington International Law Review, 44 (2), 243-316.
dc.sourceMarshall, M. (2011). The New Democratic Order. Harvard international Review, 33(1), 95-105.
dc.sourceMeisels, T. (2014). Fighting for Independece: What can Just War Theory Learn from Civil Conflict?. Social Theory & Practice, 40 (2), 304-326.
dc.sourceMoravscik,, A. (2003). Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Center for European sTUDIES Harvard University, 92 (6), 1-53.
dc.sourceNasreen, A. (2008). Pakistan, Afganistan and the Taliban. International Journal on Wolrd Peace, 25 (4), 49-73.
dc.sourceNye, J. (2004). Soft Power and American Foreign Policy. Political Science Quaterly, 119 (2), 255-270.
dc.sourceLeyton, T. (2013) Continuidades y rupturas en los discursos de la guerra de Afganistán: intelectuales, políticos y soldados. Revista estudios sociales, 47, 147-156.
dc.sourcePetrollini, D. (2012) Realismo Ofensivo y Realismo Defensivo: El debate intrarrealista. Centro Argentino de Estudios Internacionales, 27, 1-9.
dc.sourcePhillips, S. (2011). Al-Qaeda and the Struggle for Yemen. Survival, 1 (53), 95-120.
dc.sourcePiella, G. (2013). La seguridad y defensa Estadounidense en la Guerra contra el terror. Colombia Internacional, 81, 267-290.
dc.sourceRuys, T. (2013). Armed attack and article 51 of the Charter. Cambridege studies of International and comparative law, 76 (1), 187-190
dc.sourceSnyder, G. (2012). Mearsheimer's World—Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security: A Review Essay. International Security, 27(1), 149-173.
dc.sourceTaliaferro, G. (2000). Security Seeking Under Anarchy. International Security, 25 (3), 128-161.
dc.sourceToft, P. (2005). Jhon Mearsheimer: An Offensive Realist Between Geopolitics and Power. Palgrave Mcmillan Journals, 8 (4), 38, 381-408.
dc.sourceWestra, C. (2009). Will the Bush Doctrine survive its progenitor? An assessment of jus ad bellum norms for the Post- Westphalian Age. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 32 (2), 399-422.
dc.sourceWilliams, B. (2010). The Cia Covert Predator Drone War In Pakistan , 2004.2010: The History Of An Assasination Campaign. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33, 871-892.
dc.sourceVanderbilt, T. (2011). Due Process Rights and The Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: The Unconstitutional Scope of Executive Killing Power. Vanderbilt Journal of Trasnational Law, 44(5), 1353-1384.
dc.sourceVrabic, D. (2014). Realism as an approach to international Relations. Vale Inquiry Book Series, 276, 289-291.
dc.sourceZeev, M. (2012). Rivarly and State Support of Non State Armed Groups 1946-2001. International Studies Quarterly , 56 (5), 720-734.
dc.sourceBBC (2010, 22 de julio). Mapping UD Drones and Islamic attacks in Pakistan. BBC Urdu service. Disponible en http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10648909.
dc.sourceBloomberg (2013, 23 de mayo). The Drone War, a Comprehensive Map of Lethal U.S Attacks. Bloomberg Business. Disponible en http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-05-23/the-drone-war-a-comprehensive-map-of-lethal-u-dot-s-dot-attacks.
dc.sourceCamber, R. (2009, 8 de septiembre). Liquid Bomb Terror Plot that Changed Air Travel Forever. DailyMail.uk.com. Disponible en http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210876/Islamic-extremist-guilty-liquid-bomb-plot-blow-transatlantic-jets.html.
dc.sourceCouncil on Foreign Relations. (2004, 1 de febrero). The Bush Administration´s Doctrine of Preemption (and prevention):When, How Where. Council of Foreign Relations. Disponible en http://www.cfr.org/world/bush-administrations-doctrine-preemption-prevention-/p6799
dc.sourceEvans, M. (2008, 1 de marzo). Death from above: How the Predator is taking its toll on Al-Qaeda´s management. Freerepublic.com Disponible en http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2157934/posts.
dc.sourceKaplan, R. (2012, 15 de enero). Why Mearsheimer is right (about some things).En The Atlantic Magazine. Disponible http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/01/why-john-j-mearsheimer-is-right-about-some-things/308839/.
dc.sourceO´Conell, M. (2010, 21 de octubre). International Law and the use of Drones. Chatham House. Disponible en http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/field_document/il211010drones.pdf.
dc.sourceSifton, J. (2012, 7 de febrero). A Brief History of Drones. Thenation.com. Disponible en www.thenation.com/article/166124/brief-history-drones.
dc.sourceSledge, M. (2013, 23 de enero). The toll of 5 years of drone strikes. huffingtonpost.com. Disponible en http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/23/obama-drone-program-anniversary_n_4654825.htm.
dc.sourceTerdiman, D. (2014, 20 de septiembre). The history of the predator, the drone that changed the world. Cnet.com. Disponible en http://www.cnet.com/news/the-history-of-the-predator-the-drone-that-changed-the-world-q-a/
dc.sourceAddati, G. (2014) Introduccción a las UAV, Drones o VANTs. Universidad del CEMA. Disponible en http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ez.urosario.edu.co/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=96122229-add3-4e00-99ec-eb5cc10286a7%40sessionmgr115&hid.
dc.sourceAlkarama (2013). License to Kill, Why drone strikes in Yemen Violate International Law. Alkarama Reports. Disponible en http://en.alkarama.org/documents/ALK_USA-Yemen_Drones_PublicReport_EN.pdf.
dc.sourceArasli, J. (2011). State vs non state actors: asymmetric conflict and challenges to military transtion. Eurasia Review. Disponible en: http://www.eurasiareview.com/13032011-states-vs-non-state-actors-asymmetric-conflict-and-challenges-to-military-transformation/.
dc.sourceBowden, M. (2013). How the predator drone changed the character of war. Simithsonian magazine. Disponible en http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-the-predator-drone-changed-the-character-of-war-3794671/?no-ist.
dc.sourceHostage, M. (2013). Predator drones useless in combat scenarios. RT.com. Disponible en rt.com/usa/predator-drones-useless-air-force-103/.
dc.sourceHoutman, N. (2013). On a Wing and a Dare. Oregon State University Press. Disponible en http://oregonstate.edu/terra/2013/10/on-a-wing-and-a-dare/
dc.sourceHuman Rights Watch. (2013), Between a Drone and Al-Qaeda. Human Rights Watch Reports. Disponible en http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/yemen1013_ForUpload_1.pdf .
dc.sourceJohnson, D. (2001). Asymmetry and US Strategy: Definition, Background and Strategic Concepts. US Army War College. Disponible en http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=223.
dc.sourceJoined Armed Forces, (2014). Command and Control of Joint Air Operations. US Joint Air Oprations. Disponible en http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp3_30.pdf.
dc.sourceKoehler, G. (2011). A false foundation? AQAP, Tribes and ungovernered spaces in Yemen. West Point Combating Terrorism Center. Disponible en https://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/a-false-foundation-aqap-tribes-and-ungoverned-spaces-in-yemen .
dc.sourceMichaels, C. (2014). The Pakistani Response to Militancy in the Dederally Administered Tribal Areas. Atlantic Community Think Tank. Disponible en http://www.atlantic-community.org/-/the-pakistani-response-to-militancy-in-the-federally-administered-tribal-areas.
dc.sourceMiller Center (2015). American President, A Reference Rsource. Miller Center University of Virginia. Disponible en http://millercenter.org/president/clinton/essays/biography/5.
dc.sourceKeagle, J. (2011). Attack of the Drones: unmanned aerial vehicles as an instrument of war. En Proceedings of the Scientific Conference AFASES. Disponible en http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ez.urosario.edu.co/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=89251d9e-815f-4af5-a6cf-189f18144395%40sessionmgr4001&vid=9&hid=4107
dc.sourceOdom, W. (2005). America´s Inadvertent Empire. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005). Disponible en http://www.middlebury.edu/media/view/214721/original/OdomPaper.
dc.sourceUS Department of State. (2012). Global Leadership, Priorities for 21st Century Defense. Department of Defense Statements. Disponible en http://www.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf.
dc.sourceUS Department of State. (2009). American Smart Power: Diplomacy and Development are the vanguard. Department of State diplomacy in action. Disponible en http://www.state.gov/r/pa/scp/fs/2009/122579.htm.
dc.sourceThomas, B. (2008). Up in the Sky an Unblinking Eye. Newsweek. Disponible en www.newsweek.com/military-uavs-sky-unblinking-eye-89463.
dc.sourceSoufan, G. (2013). US-Pakistan relations: Aid, Drones and Delusion. En TSG Intel Brief. Disponible en http://soufangroup.com/tsg-intelbrief-us-pakistan-relations-afghanistan-aid-drones-and-delusion/
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectDrones
dc.subjectOperaciones Selectivas
dc.subjectUAV
dc.subjectEstados Unidos
dc.subjectCIA
dc.subjectMedio Oriente
dc.subjectGrupos armados no estatales
dc.titleEstrategia de intervención militar de Estados Unidos en Medio Oriente: dinámicas y consecuencias del uso de drones en Yemen y Pakistán entre 2009 a 2013
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución