dc.source | CESEDEN. (2010). Evolución del Concepto de Interés Nacional. Madrid: Ministerio de Defensa. De Ceuster, K., y Melissen, J. (Eds.). (2008). Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. East Asia Foundation; Jeju Peace Institute. (2010). Shaping New Regional Governance in East Asia [Vol. II]: A Common Vision for Mutual Benefit and Common Prosperity. Seoul: Russian Embassy. Harnisch, S. (2012). The changing dynamics of Conflict Resolution on the Korean peninsula: The role of domestic politics in North Korea, the US and the PR China. Tokio: Japanese-German Dialogue on Security and Non-Proliferation. Ick Lew, Y. (2000). Brief History of Korea: A Bird's-EyeView. New York: The Korea Society. NAHF. (2007). Korean History for International Citizens. Seoul: Northeast Asian History Foundation. Sodupe, K. (2003). La teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales a comienzos del siglo XXI. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco. Thielmann, G. (2013). Sorting Out the Nuclear and Missile Threats From North Korea. Washington D.C.: The Arms Control Association. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Michigan: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Zhongying, P. (2009). The Six-Party Process, Regional Security Mechanisms, and China-U.S. Cooperation: Toward a New Regional Security Mechanism for a New Northeast Asia? Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution Capítulos o Artículos en libros Auslin, M. R. (2011). Japanese Perspectives on the Six-Party Talks and the North Korean Nulear Crisis. En KEI, Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 2011 (págs. 195-205). Washington D.C.: Korean Economic Institute. Blank, S. (2011). Russia and the Six-Party Process in Korea. In KEI, Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 2011 (págs. 207-226). Washington D.C.: Korean Economic Institute. Cerami, J. R. (2011). From the Six-Party Talks to a Northeast Asian Security Regime? Cooperative Threat Reduction Strategies and Institutional Development. En KEI, Challenges Posed by the DPRK for the Alliance and the Region (págs. 59-77). Washington D.C.: The Korea Economic Institute. Evans, P. (2007). Constructing Multilateralism in an Anti-Region: From Six Party Talks to a Regional Security Framework in Northeast Asia? En G. Shin, y D. Snyder (Eds.), Cross Currents: Regionalism and Nationalism in Northeast Asia (págs. 99-116). Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Kang, S. M. (2006). Six-Party Talks: The Other Four. En U. I. SAIS, 2006 US-Korea Yearbook (págs. 87-94). Baltimore: John Hopkins SAIS. Lobell, S. E. (2010). Structural Realism/Offensive and Defensive Realism. En R. A. Ed. Denemark, The International Studies Encyclopedia (págs. 6651-6669). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Martin, S. B. (2003). From Balance of Power to Balancing Behavior: The Long and Winding Road. En A. K. Hanami, Perspectives on Structural Realism (págs. 61-81). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2013). Structural Realism. En T. Dunne, M. Kurki, S. Smith, y Eds., International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (págs. 77-93). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nae-Young, L. (2011). South Korea and the U.S.-ROK Alliance. En KEI, Challenges posed by the DPRK for the Alliance and the Region (págs. 1-11). Washington D.C.: Korea Economic Institute. Nanto, D. K. (2011). Increasing Dependency: North Korea’s Economic Relations with China. En K. E. Institute, Korea’s Economy 2011 (págs. 75-83). Washington: Korea Economic Institute of America. Okano-Heijmans, M. (2008). Japan and the Multilateral Talks: Peripheral Player, Powerful Spoiler. En K. De Ceuster, y J. Melissen (Eds.), Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives (págs. 71-82). The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. van der Meer, S. (2008). Russia: Many Goals, Little Activity. En K. De Ceuster, y J. Melissen (Eds.), Ending the North Korean Nuclar Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives (págs. 83-88). The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. van der Putten, F.-P. (2008). China: Learning To Be a Great Power? En K. De Ceuster, y J. Melissen (Eds.), Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives (págs. 59-70). The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. Waltz, K. (2003). The Anarchic Structure of World Politics. En J. Art, y R. E. Jervis, International Politics. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc. Artículos en publicaciones periódicas académicas. Aburto, H. (1994). El Interés nacional (Planteamiento estratégico). Revista de Administración Pública (86), 79-87. Byung Chul, K. (2003). Six-Party Talks: The Last Chance for Peace? East Asian Review, 15(4), 3-22. Celaya, R., y Villarreal, A. (2007). Comprensión geopolítica de Corea del Sur: desarrollo, tendencias y perspectivas. PORTES, 1(1), 7-24. Choi, J. (2006). The North Korean Domestic Situation and Its Impact on the Nuclear Crisis. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, 5, 1-18. Frigg, R., y Votsis, I. (2011). Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 227-276. Hecker, S. S. (2010). Lessons learned from the North Korean nuclear crises. Dædalus, 139(1), 44-56. Hernández, S. (2008). La Teoría del Realismo Estructuralista y las Interacciones entre los Estados en el Escenario Internacional. Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura, XIV(2), 13-29. James, P. (1995). Structural Realism and the Causes of War. Mershon International Studies Review, 39(2), 181-208. Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167-214. Nakato, S. (2009). Six Party Talks: The Sixth Round Talks and its Future Prospect. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, 22(1), 89-99. Park, J. S. (2005, Autumn). Inside Multilateralism: The Six-Party Talks. The Washington Quarterly, 28(4), 75-91. Rangismaporn, P. (2009). Russian Perceptions and Policie in a Multipolar Eas Asia under Yeltsin and Putin. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9(2), 230-234. Salomón, M. (2002). La Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales en los Albores del Siglo XXI: Diálogo, Disidencia, Aproximaciones. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, (2), 1-59. Snyder, S., y Byun, S.-W. (2011). Cheonan and Yeonpyeong: The Northeast Asian Response to North Korea's Provocations. Rusi Journal, 156(2), 74-81. Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41. Yongchool, H., y Beomshik, S. (2008). Non-proliferation and Political Interests: Russia’s Policy Dilemmas in the Six-party Talks. Non-Proliferation And Political Interests, 173-197. Artículos en publicaciones periódicas no académicas. North Korea 'faces food crisis. En BBC News. (2008, Abril 16). Retrieved Noviembre 5, 2013. Disponible en: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7349975.stm Gladstone, R., y Sanger, D. New Sanctions on North Korea Pass in Unified U.N. Vote. En The New York Times (2013, Marzo 7). Disponible en: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/08/world/asia/north-korea-warns-of-pre-emptive-nuclear-attack.html?_r=0 Hotham, O. Putin wants Six Party Talks “without preconditions”. En NK·News.Org (2013, Noviembre 12). Disponible en: http://www.nknews.org/2013/11/putin-wants-six-party-talks-without-preconditions/ Isidore, C. U.S. companies dump billions into China. En CNN Money (2011, Enero 20). Disponible en: http://money.cnn.com/2011/01/20/news/international/us_business_chinese_investment_boom/ Rapoza, K. Is China's Ownership Of U.S. Debt A National Security Threat? En Forbes (2013, Enero 23). Disponible en: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2013/01/23/is-chinas-ownership-of-u-s-debt-a-national-security-threat/ Otros documentos Bajoria, J., y Xu, B. (2013, Septiembre 30). The Six Party Talks on North Korea's Nuclear Program. En Council on Foreign Relations. Disponible en: http://www.cfr.org/proliferation/six-party-talks-north-koreas-nuclear-program/p13593 Candelas C., M. (2013, Abril 7). El conflicto de Corea: el imaginario geopolítico dominante y el comportamiento de los seis actores principales. En Política Crítica Revista Digital. Disponible en: politicacritica.com/2013/04/07/el-conflicto-de-corea-el-imaginario-geopolitico-dominante-en-el-comportamiento-de-los-seis-actores-estatales-principales/ Chanlett-Avery, E., y Rinehart, I. E. (2013). North Korea: U.S. Relations, Nuclear Diplomacy, and Internal Situation. Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Chanlett-Avery, E., y Squassoni, S. (2006). North Korea’s Nuclear Test: Motivations, Implications, and U.S. Options. Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Central Intelligence Agency [CIA]. (2014, Junio 20). South Korea. En CIA World Factbook. Disponible en: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ks.html Felician, S. (2011). North and South Korea: A Frozen Conflict on the Verge of Unfreezing? Istituto Affari Internazionali Working Papers, 1-14. Holloway, J. L. (2001, Mayo 18). Korean War. En US Navy. Consultado en diciembre 5, 2014. Disponible en: http://www.navy.mil/navco/pages/ssp/reference/korean-war.pdf ICG. (2009). North Korea’S Nuclear And Missile Programs, Asia Report N°168. Seoul-Brussels: International Crisis Group IINOR. (2012). Six-Party Talks. Monterey, California: Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Karam Enriquez, V. (2001) Kenneth Waltz 11 september 2001. En Mexico Diplomático 2001. Disponible en: http://www.mexicodiplomatico.org/art_diplomatico_especial/KennethWaltz.pdf Levin, J., y Milgrom, P. (2004). Introduction to Choice Theory. Stanford University, 1-25. Lin, L. (2006). The North Korean Nuclear Test and Its Implications. Washington D.C.: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute y Silk Road Studies Program, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS,. Locher, C. (2007). The conflict with North Korea / North Korea as a source of conflict: An analysis from a peace and conflict resolution studies perspective. (Tesis Doctoral) Berlin: FernUniversität Hagen. Peace and Conflict Resolution Studies. Recuperado en: http://www.humiliationstudies.org/documents/LocherDoctoralThesisCompleteVersion2.pdf Martin, M. (2009). The Six-Party Talks and New Opportunities to Strengthen Regional Nonproliferation and Disarmament Efforts. (págs. 1-24). Beijing: The Stanley Foundation; National Commitee on North Korea; China Arms Control and Disarmament Association; Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis. Disponible en: http://www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/report/6partytalksrpt309.pdf Nikitin, M. B. (2013). North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons: Technical Issues. Washington: Congressional Research Service. Security Council - UN. (2009, Junio 12). Security Council, Acting Unanimously, Condemns in Strongest Terms Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Nuclear Test, Toughens Sanctions. En United Nations. Disponible en: http://www.un.org/press/en/2009/sc9679.doc.htm Six Party Talks Chairman. (2004, Febrero) Six Party Talk Documents Archive: Second Round Six Party Talks Chairman Statement. En The National Commitee on North Korea. Disponible en: http://www.ncnk.org/resources/briefing-papers/publications/ChairmanStatement_2ndRound_Sixparty.doc/file_view Statista. (2014, Diciembre 2). U.S. direct investment position in China from 2000 to 2013 (in billion U.S. dollars, on a historical-cost basis). En The Statistics Portal. Disponible en: http://www.statista.com/statistics/188629/united-states-direct-investments-in-china-since-2000/ Sung-Chool, L. (2011). The ROK-US. Joint Political and Military Response to North Korean Armed Provocations. Washington D.C.: CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies). Zhang, H. (2005). Chinese Perspectives on the North Korean Nuclear Issue. Institute for Nuclear Materials Management 46th Annual Meeting (págs. 1-8). Phoenix, Az.: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. | |