dc.creatorLinder, Jodell E.
dc.creatorPlachco, Tatyana E.
dc.creatorLibster, Romina Paula
dc.creatorMiller, E. Kathryn
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-02T20:22:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T14:04:25Z
dc.date.available2018-03-02T20:22:53Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T14:04:25Z
dc.date.created2018-03-02T20:22:53Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifierLinder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn; Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning; Elsevier Science; Journal of Virological Methods; 211; 1-2015; 64-69
dc.identifier0166-0934
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/37730
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1882581
dc.description.abstractHuman rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093414003759
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.09.020
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectCLONE
dc.subjectPLASMID
dc.subjectRHINOVIRUS
dc.subjectRV
dc.subjectRV-C
dc.subjectSEQUENCING
dc.titleSequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución