dc.creatorBezerra, Raquel Pedrosa
dc.creatorMatsudo, Marcelo Chuei
dc.creatorSato, Sunao
dc.creatorPerego, Patrizia
dc.creatorConverti, Attilio
dc.creatorCarvalho, Joao Carlos Monteiro de
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-05T10:02:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:11:58Z
dc.date.available2013-11-05T10:02:52Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:11:58Z
dc.date.created2013-11-05T10:02:52Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierBIOMASS & BIOENERGY, OXFORD, v. 37, pp. 309-317, FEB, 2012
dc.identifier0961-9534
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/40923
dc.identifier10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.11.007
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.11.007
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1632736
dc.description.abstractBioenergetic analysis may be applied in order to predict microbial growth yields, based on the Gibbs energy dissipation and mass conservation principles of the overall growth reaction. The bioenergetics of the photoautotrophic growth of the cyanobacterium Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis was investigated in different bioreactor configurations (tubular photobioreactor and open ponds) using different nitrogen sources (nitrate and urea) and under different light intensity conditions to determine the best growing conditions in terms of Gibbs energy dissipation, number of photons to sustain cell growth and phototrophic energy yields distribution in relation to the ATP and NADPH formation, and release of heat. Although an increase in the light intensity increased the Gibbs energy dissipated for cell growth and maintenance with both nitrogen sources, it did not exert any appreciable influence on the moles of photons absorbed by the system to produce one C-mol biomass. On the other hand, both bioenergetic parameters were higher in cultures with nitrate than with urea, likely because of the higher energy requirements needed to reduce the former nitrogen source to ammonia. They appreciably increased also when open ponds were substituted by the tubular photobioreactor, where a more efficient light distribution ensured a remarkably higher cell mass concentration. The estimated percentages of the energy absorbed by the cell showed that, compared with nitrate, the use of urea as nitrogen source allowed the system to address higher energy fractions to ATP production and light fixation by the photosynthetic apparatus, as well as a lower fraction released as heat. The best energy yields values on Gibbs energy necessary for cell growth and maintenance were achieved in up to 4-5 days of cultivation, indicating that it would be the optimum range to maintain cell growth. Thanks to this better bioenergetic situation, urea appears to be a quite promising low-cost, alternative nitrogen source for Arthrospira platensis cultures in photobioreactors. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
dc.publisherOXFORD
dc.relationBIOMASS & BIOENERGY
dc.rightsCopyright PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
dc.rightsclosedAccess
dc.subjectARTHROSPIRA (SPIRULINA) PLATENSIS
dc.subjectBIOENERGETICS
dc.subjectNITROGEN SOURCE
dc.subjectLIGHT INTENSITY
dc.subjectBIOREACTOR CONFIGURATION
dc.titleEffects of photobioreactor configuration, nitrogen source and light intensity on the fed-batch cultivation of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis. Bioenergetic aspects
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución