dc.creatorCONTE, Ana Lucia F.
dc.creatorMARQUES, Amelia P.
dc.creatorCASAROTTO, Raquel A.
dc.creatorAMADO-JOAO, Silvia M.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T18:25:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:12:50Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T18:25:53Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:12:50Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T18:25:53Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierJOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, v.32, n.2, p.149-153, 2009
dc.identifier0161-4754
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/23367
dc.identifierhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?Func=Frame&product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=EndNote&UT=000264123500007&Init=Yes&SrcAuth=ResearchSoft&mode=FullRecord
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1620097
dc.description.abstractObjective: The Purpose of this study was to determine whether handedness influences bilateral shoulder range of motion in nonathlete adult women. Methods: This was an observational Study. Shoulder range of motion (flexion, abduction, horizontal adduction, extension, external and internal rotation) was passively and bilaterally measured in 50 female, right-handed, and healthy university students, ranging from 20 to 29 years of age, who were not practicing repetitive activities with the upper limbs at the time Of this study. The assessment was performed with a universal goniometer, twice for each subject by the same examiner. irst and second measurements were correlated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, which was high for all movements and ranged from 0.80 to 0.97. The Student t test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare the range of motion between the dominant and nondominant shoulders and the mean differences between the 2 sides. The effect of size vias alpha = .05. Results: There is statistically significance difference between the 2 sides when the rotational range of motion is compared the dominant shoulder presented increased external rotation (mean, 4.74 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-7.87) and decreased internal rotation (mean, 3.52 degrees; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-5.4) compared to the opposite Shoulder. Conclusion: Dominance should be considered when shoulder rotation is evaluated even in nonathlete adult women. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32:149-153)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIER
dc.relationJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
dc.rightsCopyright MOSBY-ELSEVIER
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectRange of Motion
dc.subjectShoulder Joint
dc.subjectFunctional Laterality
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy
dc.titleHANDEDNESS INFLUENCES PASSIVE SHOULDER RANGE OF MOTION IN NONATHLETE ADULT WOMEN
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución