The Future Of Science Governance: Publics, Policies, Practices

dc.creatorMacnaghten P.
dc.creatorChilvers J.
dc.date2014
dc.date2015-06-25T17:56:36Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:45:58Z
dc.date2015-06-25T17:56:36Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:45:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:55:22Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:55:22Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierEnvironment And Planning C: Government And Policy. Pion Limited, v. 32, n. 3, p. 530 - 548, 2014.
dc.identifier0263774X
dc.identifier10.1068/c1245j
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84901650033&partnerID=40&md5=2e256920ec8f65ed3bf2f258f564f12c
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/87073
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/87073
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84901650033
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1252649
dc.descriptionIn this paper we develop new insights on science governance at a time when an emphasis on public engagement in responding to questions of trust in science is giving way to a more systemic and networked perspective. In a meta-analysis across seventeen UK public dialogue processes we identify five spheres of public concern about the governance of science and technology relating to: the purposes of science; trust; inclusion; speed and direction of innovation; and equity. Forty in-depth interviews with senior UK sciencepolicy actors reveal highly partial institutional responses to these concerns and help explain the underlying processes that close down, and at times open up, reflection and response on public values. Finally, we consider the implications of this analysis for the future of science governance, prospects for more anticipatory, reflexive, and inclusive forms of governing, and the roles for critical social science inquiry.
dc.description32
dc.description3
dc.description530
dc.description548
dc.descriptionArgyris, C., Schön, D., (1996) Organisational Learning II, , (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
dc.descriptionBarben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C., Guston, D., Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration (2008) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 979-1000. , In, 3rd edition, Eds E Hackett, O Amsterdamska, M Lynch, J Wajcman (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
dc.descriptionBeck, U., (2000) World Risk Society, , (Polity Press, Cambridge)
dc.descriptionBeierle, T.C., Konisky, D.M., What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes (2001) Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, pp. 515-527
dc.descriptionBickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Jones, M., Pidgeon, N., Locating scientific citizenship: The institutional contexts and cultures of public engagement (2010) Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35, pp. 474-500
dc.descriptionBijker, W., Bal, R., Hendriks, R., (2009) The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies, , (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
dc.descriptionBingham, N., Slowing things down: Lessons from the GM controversy (2008) Geoforum, 39, pp. 111-122
dc.descriptionBulkeley, H., Mol, A., Participation and environmental governance: Consensus, ambivalence and debate (2003) Environmental Values, 12, pp. 143-154
dc.descriptionCallon, M., Millo, Y., Muniesa, F., (2007) Market Devices, , (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, Sussex)
dc.descriptionCallon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthe, Y., (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, , (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
dc.descriptionChilvers, J., Environmental risk, uncertainty, and participation: Mapping an emergent epistemic community (2008) Environment and Planning A, 40, pp. 2990-3008
dc.descriptionChilvers, J., Deliberative and participatory approaches in environmental geography (2009) The Companion to Environmental Geography, pp. 400-417. , In, Eds N Castree, D Demeritt, D Liverman, B Rhoads (Blackwell, London)
dc.descriptionChilvers, J., (2010) Sustainable Participation? Mapping Out and Reflecting on the Field of Public Dialogue in Science and Technology, , (Sciencewise-ERC, Harwell, Oxon)
dc.descriptionChilvers, J., Reflexive engagement? Actors, learning, and reflexivity in public dialogue on science and technology (2013) Science Communication, 35, pp. 283-310
dc.descriptionChilvers, J., McNaghten, P., (2011) The Future of Science Governance: A Review of Public Concerns, Governance and Institutional Response, , (Sciencewise-ERC, Harwell, Oxon)
dc.description(2008) A Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research, , EC, (European Commission, Brussels)
dc.descriptionEkins, S., Williams, A., Reaching out to collaborators: Crowdsourcing for pharmaceutical research (2010) Pharmaceutical Research, 27, pp. 393-395
dc.descriptionFelt, U., Wynne, B., (2007) Taking European knowledge seriously, , report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission, Brussels
dc.descriptionFisher, E., Mahajan, R., Mitcham, C., Midstream modulation: Governance from within (2006) Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 26, pp. 485-496
dc.descriptionFletcher, D.R., Tackling concentrations of worklessness: Highlighting the limits of workfocused organisational cultures in the UK (2008) Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, pp. 563-582
dc.descriptionFuntowicz, S., Ravetz, J., Science for the post-normal age (1993) Futures, 25, pp. 739-755
dc.descriptionGrove-White, R., New wine, old bottles? Personal reflections on the new biotechnology commissions (2001) The Political Quarterly, 72, pp. 466-472
dc.descriptionGrove-White, R., McNaghten, P., Wynne, B., (2000) Wising-up: The public and new technologies, , Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University, Lancaster
dc.descriptionGuston, D., Sarewitz, D., Real-time technology assessment (2002) Technology in Society, 24, pp. 93-109
dc.descriptionGuy, S., Designing urban knowledge: Competing perspectives on energy and buildings (2006) Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, pp. 645-659
dc.descriptionHagendijk, R., The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds (2004) Minerva, 42, pp. 41-59
dc.descriptionIrwin, A., (1995) Citizen Science, , (Routledge, London)
dc.descriptionIrwin, A., The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance (2006) Social Studies of Science, 36, pp. 299-330
dc.descriptionKearnes, M., Wynne, B., On nanotechnology and ambivalence: The politics of enthusiasm (2009) NanoEthics, 1, pp. 131-142
dc.descriptionKleiner, K., Data on demand (2011) Nature Climate Change, 1, pp. 1-12
dc.descriptionLeach, M., Scoones, I., Stirling, A., (2010) Dynamic Sustainabilities, , (Earthscan, London)
dc.descriptionLezaun, J., Soneryd, L., Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics (2007) Public Understanding of Science, 16, pp. 279-297
dc.descriptionMcNaghten, P., Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: Narrative structures, public responses, and emerging nanotechnologies (2010) Environment and Planning A, 41, pp. 23-37
dc.descriptionMcNaghten, P., Guivant, J., Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom (2011) Public Understanding of Science, 20, pp. 207-220
dc.descriptionMcNaghten, P., Jacobs, M., Public identification with sustainable development: Investigating cultural barriers to participation (1997) Global Environmental Change, 7, pp. 1-20
dc.descriptionMcNaghten, P., Kearnes, M., Wynne, B., Nanotechnology, governance and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? (2005) Science Communication, 27, pp. 268-291
dc.descriptionMarres, N., The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy (2007) Social Studies of Science, 37, pp. 759-780
dc.descriptionMarris, C., Wynne, B., Simmons, P., Weldon, S., (2001) Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe, , Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University, Lancaster
dc.descriptionMichael, M., Brown, N., Scientific citizenships: Self-representations of xenotransplantation's publics (2005) Science as Culture, 14, pp. 39-57
dc.descriptionOwen, R., Stilgoe, J., McNaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., Guston, D., A framework for responsible innovation (2013) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, pp. 27-50. , In, Eds R Owen, J Bessant, M Heitz (Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
dc.descriptionPallett, H., Chilvers, J., A decade of learning about publics, participation, and climate change: Institutionalising reflexivity? (2013) Environment and Planning A, 45, pp. 1162-1183
dc.descriptionPestre, D., Challenges for the democratic management of technoscience: Governance, participation and the political today (2008) Science as Culture, 17, pp. 101-119
dc.descriptionPielke, R., (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, , (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
dc.descriptionRowe, G., Frewer, L., Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation (2000) Science Technology, and Human Values, 25, pp. 3-29
dc.descriptionSchein, E., (1995) Organisational Culture and Leadership, , (Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA)
dc.descriptionStart, D., (2010) Ethical Dimensions in Sciencewise: A Review of Public Perceptions of Ethics Issues from the Sciencewise Dialogues (, , Sciencewise-ERC, Harwell, Oxon)
dc.descriptionStengers, I., (2000) The Invention of Modern Science, , (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
dc.descriptionStilgoe, J., Owen, R., McNaghten, P., Towards a framework of responsible innovation: From concept to practice through an experiment at the UK research councils, , forthcoming, Research Policy
dc.descriptionStirling, A., 'Opening up' and 'closing down': Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology (2008) Science Technology and Human Values, 33, pp. 262-294
dc.descriptionStirling, A., Mayer, S., A novel approach to the appraisal of technological risk: A multicriteria mapping study of a genetically modified crop (2001) Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, pp. 529-555
dc.description(2011) Science, governance and public engagement, , TNS BMRB, London
dc.descriptionvon Schomberg, R., The quest for the 'right' impacts of science and technology: An outlook towards a framework for responsible research and innovation (2012) Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren. Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer Methoden, pp. 39-62. , In, Eds M Dusseldorp, R Beecroft (VS Verlag, Wiesbaden)
dc.descriptionvon Schomberg, R., A vision of responsible research and innovation (2013) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, pp. 27-50. , In, Eds R Owen, J Bessant, M Heitz (Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
dc.descriptionWilsdon, J., Willis, R., (2004) See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream, , (Demos, London)
dc.descriptionWynne, B., Public uptake of science: A case for institutional reflexivity (1993) Public Understanding of Science, 2, pp. 321-337
dc.descriptionWynne, B., Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science: Hitting the notes, but missing the music? (2006) Community Genetics, 9, pp. 211-220
dc.description(2010) Exploring the boundaries: Report on a public dialogue into animals containing human material, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/Exploring-the-boundaries-Full-report.pdf, Animals Containing Human Material
dc.description(2009) The big energy shift: Report from citizens forum, , http://www.sciencewiseerc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/BigEnergyShiftFinalReport300609.pdf, Big Energy Shift
dc.description(2008) Community X-Change: A voice for local communities, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/Community-x-change-finalreport2010.pdf, Community X.-Change
dc.descriptionDrugsfutures, (2007) Public engagement on the future of brain science, addiction and drugs, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/BSAD-public-engagement.pdf
dc.description(2011) Findings from the DECC 2050 deliberative dialogues, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/Findings-from-DECC-2050-Deliberative-Dialogues.pdf, Energy 2050 Pathways
dc.description(2008) A citizens' inquiry into the forensic use of DNA and the national DNA database: Contractor's report, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Projectfiles/HGC-Contractors-Report.pdf, Forensic Use of DNA
dc.descriptionGeoengineering, (2010) Experiment earth? Report on a public dialogue on geoengineering, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/geoengineering-dialogue-finalreport.pdf
dc.descriptionHybrids, Chimeras, (2006) Hybrids and chimeras: A report on the findings of the consultation, , http://sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/Hybrid-Chimera-Embryos-Report.pdf
dc.descriptionBiotechnology, I., (2008) Public perceptions of industrial biotechnology, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/final-report.pdf
dc.description(2011) Public engagement on landscape and ecosystem futures in England, Scotland and Wales, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Projectfiles/Climate-Change-Conversations.pdf, http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/ Uploads/Project-files/LandscapesEastEnglandArable.pdf, Landscape and Ecosystem Futures, http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/ Project-files/Cambrian-Mountains-dialogue.pdf
dc.description(2011) Galvanising community-led responses to climate change, , http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/Galvanising-responses-CC-v7.pdf, Low Carbon Communities Challenge
dc.descriptionNanodialogues, (2007) Nanodialogues: Experiments in public engagement with science, , http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Nanodialogues%20-%20%20web.pdf?1240939425
dc.descriptionBusiness, R., (2006) Reduce, recycle, rethink: Young people's views on climate change, , http://sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Risky-Business-Final-Report.pdf
dc.descriptionHorizons, S., (2007) Science horizons: Summary report, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/sciencehorizons-summary-report.pdf
dc.descriptionCell, S., (2008) Stem cell dialogue, , http://sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/Stem-Cell-Final-Report.pdf
dc.descriptionBiology, S., (2010) Synthetic biology dialogue, , http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/1006-synthetic-biology-dialogue.pdf
dc.descriptionTrustguide, (2006) Trustguide: Final report, , http://sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/TrustGuide-final-Report.pdf
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPion Limited
dc.relationEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleThe Future Of Science Governance: Publics, Policies, Practices
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución