dc.contributorPeña Higuavita, Germán Adolfo
dc.creatorMesa Jaramillo, Alejandro
dc.creatorMier Rodríguez, Oscar Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-31T17:17:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-05T16:34:12Z
dc.date.available2023-10-31T17:17:48Z
dc.date.available2024-08-05T16:34:12Z
dc.date.created2023-10-31T17:17:48Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10784/33103
dc.identifier332.632 M578
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9538473
dc.description.abstractWithin portfolio management, the strategy used by investors is summarized in a document called investment policy, which serves as a roadmap for executing their plan. Normally, in the academic and professional environment, traditional strategies based on fundamental analysis tend to be implemented and other strategies based on non-traditional methods such as technical analysis and quantitative methods that may have better performance under certain market conditions are left aside. This theoretical-practical study will seek to compare the performance of the main traditional versus non-traditional strategies when managing an investment portfolio in equity assets. These results are compared using objective metrics obtained through historical data of the last 10 years for different mutual funds and hedge funds.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad EAFIT
dc.publisherMaestría en Administración Financiera
dc.publisherEscuela de Finanzas, Economía y Gobierno. Departamento de Finanzas
dc.publisherMedellín
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightsTodos los derechos reservados
dc.subjectGestión de portafolios
dc.subjectFondos mutuos
dc.subjectFondos de cobertura
dc.subjectAnálisis técnico
dc.subjectAnálisis fundamental
dc.titleAnálisis técnico y cuantitativo vs gestión tradicional de portafolios : una mirada teórica-práctica a sus desempeños históricos
dc.typemasterThesis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución