dc.contributorBurga León, Andrés Alberto
dc.creatorGonzales, L.L.
dc.creatorMatos, L.
dc.creatorVan den Broeck, A.
dc.creatorBurga León, Andrés Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-06T20:14:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T13:21:08Z
dc.date.available2024-03-06T20:14:26Z
dc.date.available2024-05-08T13:21:08Z
dc.date.created2024-03-06T20:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierGonzales, L., Matos, L., Van den Broeck, A., Burga, A. A. (2024). Evidence of validity and reliability of the controlling motivational style questionnaire in the work context. Helyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25478
dc.identifier2405-8440
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/20035
dc.identifierHeliyon
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25478
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85183973018
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9355694
dc.description.abstractAccording to the self-determination theory (SDT), leaders may adopt a controlling motivational controlling style (CMS) that forces employees to think, feel, or behave in a certain way to promote employee motivation. However, a scale has yet to be developed to measure CMS in the work environment. Usually, researchers use questionnaires adapted to different contexts or designed for another motivational style. However, whether these questionnaires capture the behaviors that represent CMS in the work context is little known. This research aimed to elaborate on and analyze the validity and reliability of the questionnaire on Controlling Motivational Style at Work (CMS-W). The study was based on a literature review of the types of controlling behaviors and a review of questionnaires used by SDT researchers who assessed the controlling motivational style in different contexts. A Peruvian sample of 1100 public sector employees participated. The results show that the short and encompassing CMS-W-11 has a one-dimensional structure with good fit indices: Robust RMSEA = 0.071 with 90 % CI from 0.064 to 0.078; Robust CFI = 0.975; Robust TLI = 0.969; SRMR = 0.025 and good reliability coefficients: O = 0.930 and AVE 0.630. Furthermore, it shows convergent validity with controlled motivation (r = 0.260, p < .001) and discriminant validity with autonomous motivation (r = -0.270, p < .001). Moreover, the invariance of the gender category was tested. The fit indices were adequate, and the comparative results between the models were also satisfactory. In addition, the behaviors of the CMS in a work context are conditional negative regard, judging and devaluing, control through objectives, intimidation, and intrusive authority. Therefore, labor organizations will have the CMS-W validated and tested in a work context to evaluate the CMS of leaders and study how it related to the motivation of human capital and organizational objectives.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisherNL
dc.relationurn:issn:2405-8440
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - Ulima
dc.sourceUniversidad de Lima
dc.titleEvidence of validity and reliability of the controlling motivational style questionnaire in the work context
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución