dc.creatorFigueroa, Adolfo Ivan
dc.date2023-12-29
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T17:26:43Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T17:26:43Z
dc.identifierhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/26702
dc.identifier10.18800/economia.202302.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9334772
dc.descriptionWhat does the Immanuel kant´s paradox mean for science? Why is the difference between analytic and synthetic sentences-propositions a central puzzle in science, epistemology, analytical philosophy, and philosophy of science? These inquiries entail a profound research on the foundation of philosophy and science. Despite all this necessary endeavor, this brief article focuses on the case Popper-Figueroa with the purpose to highlight the basic philosophical challenges regarding the construction of the bedrock - the substantiality of ontology- or the substratum in the scientific process.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Católica del Perúen-US
dc.relationhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/26702/26008
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2023 Adolfo Ivan Figueroaes-ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceEconomía; Volume 46 Issue 92 (2023); 1-8es-ES
dc.source2304-4306
dc.source0254-4415
dc.subjectRefutabilityen-US
dc.subjectRisken-US
dc.subjectFoundationen-US
dc.titleThe Odyssey of science: The case of Karl Popper and Adolfo Figueroaen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución