dc.creatorCaycho-Rodríguez, Tomás
dc.creatorVilca, Lindsey W.
dc.creatorPeña-Calero, Brian Norman
dc.creatorBarboza-Palomino, Miguel
dc.creatorWhite, Michael
dc.creatorReyes-Bossio, Mario
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-03T22:15:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T02:47:44Z
dc.date.available2022-03-03T22:15:21Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T02:47:44Z
dc.date.created2022-03-03T22:15:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.identifier0211139X
dc.identifier10.1016/j.regg.2021.09.001
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10757/659220
dc.identifier15781747
dc.identifierRevista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85121319416
dc.identifierSCOPUS_ID:85121319416
dc.identifierS0211139X21001773
dc.identifier0000 0001 2196 144X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9328162
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) is an instrument that measures the severity of anxiety due to COVID-19 or coronaphobia. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults are the most vulnerable age group; therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CAS in this group. Materials and method: 274 Peruvian older adults participated (Mage = 67.86; SD = 6.34, 64.6% women). In addition to the CAS, the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), and 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-2) were applied. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to assess the factor structure of the CAS and Item Response Theory was used to analyze item characteristics. A sequence of hierarchical variance models was used to evaluate the measurement invariance of the CAS according to age. To assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) and the omega coefficient (ω) were used. The correlations between the CAS score and the scores of the PHQ-2 and GAD-2 scales were calculated with Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Results: The results of the CFA indicated that the unidimensional model of the CAS fitted the data adequately and showed very good reliability (α and ω ≥ .83). Likewise, all items provided high information and adequate discrimination, which allowed for better detection of average and high levels of coronaphobia in the older adult population. However, the CAS did not show evidence of being strictly invariant between older adults aged 60–65 years and 66–86 years. The CAS showed significant correlations with anxiety (r = .72; [95%CI: .66, .87] p < .01) and depression (r = .53; [95%CI: .43, .76] p < .01). Conclusion: The CAS in Spanish shows evidence of validity based on internal structure, convergent and divergent validity, as well as an adequate reliability estimate to assess coronaphobia in older adults. The CAS can be used to detect average and high levels of coronaphobia in the older adult population.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherEdiciones Doyma, S.L.
dc.relationhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211139X21001773?via%3Dihub
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.sourceUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
dc.sourceRepositorio Academico - UPC
dc.sourceRevista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia
dc.source57
dc.source1
dc.source20
dc.source27
dc.subjectCoronaphobia
dc.subjectCoronavirus Anxiety Scale
dc.subjectOlder adults
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectValidity
dc.titleMeasurement of coronaphobia in older adults: Validation of the Spanish version of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución