dc.creatorValverde Espinoza, Natalia
dc.creatorBarja Ore, John
dc.creatorSolis Rojas, Mirian
dc.creatorPérez Silva, Margarita
dc.creatorHerrera Málaga, Rocío
dc.creatorHuamán Angulo, Lizardo
dc.creatorRodríguez López, Brenda
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-17T23:50:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-03T20:17:57Z
dc.date.available2023-10-17T23:50:23Z
dc.date.available2024-05-03T20:17:57Z
dc.date.created2023-10-17T23:50:23Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-04
dc.identifierValverde, N., Barja, J., Solis, M., Pérez, M., Herrera, R., Huamán, L., & Rodríguez, B. (2023). Personal protective equipment: Analysis of supply among midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru. Midwifery, 118, 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103583
dc.identifier.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11537/34571
dc.identifierMidwifery
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103583
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9282419
dc.description.abstractObjective: To report the details of provision of personal protective equipment to midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru Methods: This is a non-experimental, descriptive, cross-sectional study. An online survey of 679 midwives working at public healthcare centres was conducted via questionnaires. The following aspects were outlined: method of supply and frequency of delivery of personal protective equipment, type of personal protective equipment provided by the institution, and self-purchase. Furthermore, features of the midwives’ workplace were described. For statistical analysis, absolute frequencies and relative proportions were used for categorical variables, and mean and standard deviation were used for numerical variables. Measurements and findings: The most important finding of this study is that a large proportion of midwives (66.6%) did not receive new personal protective equipment for each shift; 41.9% of midwives who received personal protective equipment during each shift exclusively provided services in the COVID-19 ward, whereas 27.6% did not. The least received supplies were of N95 respirator masks (41.7%) and disposable isolation suit gown (50.5%). Only a certain proportion of midwives (38.6%) were trained by their own institutions on the use of personal protective equipment. Key conclusions: The provision of personal protective equipment to midwives and training on personal protective equipment were insufficient at all workplaces. Therefore, measures must be taken to increase the supply of this material to midwives who are essential workers in reproductive health.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone
dc.publisherPE
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América
dc.sourceUniversidad Privada del Norte
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - UPN
dc.subjectPersonal protective equipment
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectMidwifery
dc.subjectHealth services
dc.titlePersonal protective equipment: Analysis of supply among midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución