dc.creatorGjerde, Hallvard
dc.creatorSousa, Tanara R.
dc.creatorDe Boni, Raquel Brandini
dc.creatorChristophersen, Asbjorg S.
dc.creatorLimberger, Renata P.
dc.creatorZancanaro, Ivomar
dc.creatorOiestad, Elisabeth L.
dc.creatorNormann, Per T.
dc.creatorMorland, Jorg
dc.creatorPechansky, Flavio
dc.date2015-06-22T16:41:43Z
dc.date2015-06-22T16:41:43Z
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T00:14:02Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T00:14:02Z
dc.identifierGJERDE, Hallvard et al. A comparison of alcohol and drug use by random motor vehicle drivers in Brazil and Norway. International Journal of Drug Policy, v.25, n.3, p.393–400, 2014.
dc.identifier0955-3959
dc.identifierhttps://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/10950
dc.identifier10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.019
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8898784
dc.descriptionBackground: A large proportion of road traffic crashes are related to driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the use of alcohol, illegal drugs and psychoactive medicinal drugs among random drivers in Brazil and Norway, two countries with the same legal limit for drunk driving, but with marked differences in legislation history, enforcement and penalties for DUI, and to discuss any differences found. Methods: Roadside surveys were conducted on Fridays and Saturdays between noon and midnight. Samples of oral fluid were collected for analysis of drugs, whereas alcohol was determined by breath testing or by analysis of oral fluid. Results: High participation rates of 94–97% were obtained in both countries. The weighted prevalence of driving with alcohol concentrations in breath or oral fluid equivalent to blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) above 0.2 g/L was 2.7% (95% CI 2.2–3.3) in Brazil and 0.2% (95% CI 0.0–0.5) in Norway. Stimulants (amphetamines or cocaine) were found in samples from 1.0% (95% CI 0.7–1.4) of drivers in Brazil and 0.3% (95% CI 0.1–0.7) in Norway. The prevalence of amphetamines was highest among Brazilian truck drivers (3.6%; 95% CI 2.0–6.4). Tetrahydrocannabinol was found in samples from 0.5% (95% CI 0.3–0.8) of drivers in Brazil and 1.0% (95% CI 0.6–1.5) in Norway, whereas benzodiazepines or zopiclone were found in 1.0% (95% CI 0.7–1.4) and 1.7% (95% CI 1.2–2.4) of the samples from Brazil and Norway, respectively. Conclusions: The difference in the prevalence of alcohol may be related to the fact that Norway has implemented steps to reduce drunk driving since 1936, whereas Brazil has attempted to do the same for only a few years. Differences for drugs may be related to different patterns in the use of stimulants, cannabis and medicines.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsrestricted access
dc.subjectCondução Sob Influência
dc.subjectAlcohol Drinking
dc.subjectPharmaceutical Preparations
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectNorway
dc.subjectDriving Under the Influence
dc.subjectConsumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas
dc.subjectPreparações Farmacêuticas
dc.subjectBrasil
dc.subjectNoruega
dc.titleA comparison of alcohol and drug use by random motor vehicle drivers in Brazil and Norway
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución