Verdades antiguas y modernas

Ancient and modern truths

dc.creatorMiller, David
dc.date2011-06-24 00:00:00
dc.date2011-06-24 00:00:00
dc.date2011-06-24
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T18:15:56Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T18:15:56Z
dc.identifier0124-6127
dc.identifierhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
dc.identifier2462-9596
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8694385
dc.descriptionEste artículo presenta una comparación de las teorías de verdad, y las soluciones a la paradoja del mentiroso,  propuestas por Tomas Bradwardino (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), y Alfred Tarski (1901–1983).  Además realiza una breve crítica a la posición expuesta por Read en su artículo: The liar and the new T-schema.
dc.descriptionThis paper undertakes a comparison of theories of truth and the solutions to the paradox of the liar advanced  by Thomas Bradwardine (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), and Alfred Tarski (1901– 1983). In addition,  it offers a brief criticism to Read’s point of views as expounded in his paper: The liar and the new T-schema.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Caldas
dc.relation227
dc.relation18
dc.relation207
dc.relation12
dc.relationDiscusiones Filosóficas
dc.relationBellhouse, D. R. “De Vetula: A Medieval Manuscript Containing Probability Calculations”. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 68, 2000. 123-136. Print.
dc.relationBlack, M. Language and Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1949. Print.
dc.relationBoyer, C. B. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. Nueva Iorque: Hafner Publishing Company, Inc. Reimprimido 1959. Nueva Iorque: Dover Publications, Inc, 1949. Print.
dc.relationGoldstein, L. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis 46, 1986. 117-121. Print.
dc.relation- - -. “Doubting Thomas: from Bradwardine back to Anon”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 65-85. Print.
dc.relationGrant, E. “Bradwardine and Galileo: Equality of Velocities in the Void”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2, 1965. 344-364. Print.
dc.relationMiller, D. W. Reseña de Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot. Philosophy 85, 3, 2008. 433-436. Print.
dc.relationMills, E. “Scheming and Lying”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 113–128. Print.
dc.relationMou, B. “The Enumerative Character of Tarski’s Definition of Truth and Its General Character in a Tarskian System”. Synthese 126, 2001. 91–122. Print.
dc.relationPanaccio, C. “Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisited”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 229–253. Print.
dc.relationQuine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60, 1951. 20-43. Reprinted. From A Logical Point of View. W. V. O. Quine. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1953. 20-46. Print.
dc.relationRahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., and Genot, E. Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2008. Print.
dc.relationRead, S. L. “The Truth Schema and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008a. 3-17. Print.
dc.relation- - -. “Further Thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008b. 205-225. Print.
dc.relation- - -. Thomas Bradwardine, “Insolubilia”. Paris, Lovaina, Walpole MA: Peeters, 2010. Print.
dc.relationRestall, G. “Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 135–147. Print.
dc.relationSandu, G. “Read on the Liar”. Approaching Truth. Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. Eds. Pihlström, S., Raatikainen, P. and Sintonen, M. Londres: College Publications. 2007. 129–140. Print.
dc.relationSpade, P. V. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signification”. Medioevo: Revista di storia delle filosofia medievale 7, 1981. 115–134. Lies, Language and Logic in the Late Middle Ages. Reprinted as chapter IV of P. V. Spade, 1988. Londres: Variorum Reprints.
dc.relationTarski, A. “Grundzüge des Systemenkalkül”. Fundamenta Mathematicae 25, 1935–1936. 503–526, and 26. 2. 283–301. Las referencias son a la traducción inglesa. “Foundations of the Calculus of Systems”, capítulo XII, 1956. 342–383. Print.
dc.relation________. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 1944. 341-375. Print.
dc.relation_________. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956. Print.
dc.relationWright, C.J. G. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. Print.
dc.relationNúm. 18 , Año 2011 : Enero - Junio
dc.relationhttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/715/638
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2011 Discusiones Filosóficas
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
dc.subjectSelf-reference
dc.subjectBradwardine
dc.subjectBuridan
dc.subjectTarski
dc.subjectparadox of the Liar
dc.subjectdiagonalization method
dc.subjecttheory of meaning
dc.subjecttheories of truth
dc.subjectAutorreferencia
dc.subjectBradwardino
dc.subjectBuridan
dc.subjectTarski
dc.subjectparadoja del mentiroso
dc.subjectmétodo de diagonalización
dc.subjectteoría de la significación
dc.subjectteorías de la verdad
dc.titleVerdades antiguas y modernas
dc.titleAncient and modern truths
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typeSección Artículos
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución