| dc.contributor | Montecé Moreno, Omar Rodrigo | |
| dc.creator | Jiménez Anastacio, David Bolívar | |
| dc.date | 2022-09-27T03:08:38Z | |
| dc.date | 2022-09-27T03:08:38Z | |
| dc.date | 2022 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-08T17:01:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-08T17:01:22Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/12566 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8042727 | |
| dc.description | After a detailed investigation proposed by the comparative analysis of hybrid and native frameworks in the development of apps for android mobiles, it is of vital importance to know with which of the two types of frameworks to be able to work as a user, it has been possible to determine that according to the version of the users who have been surveyed make it known that it is better to work or use hybrid frameworks, however, through the collection of data that has been found and the bibliography that has been searched, the respective comparative analysis was carried out where it was possible to show that It is much more recommended to use a native framework in the development of mobile apps in android. Since the advantages that native frameworks have as opposed to hybrid frameworks can be detailed in a very clear way and therefore the improvements that native frameworks bring with them as opposed to hybrid frameworks can be highlighted, it is convenient to be able to use a type of framework that is faster and easier to use when developing a mobile app for android, and therefore have control of what is being done so that the user has a higher quality experience when using or disposing of their mobile. However, we cannot fail to mention that a hybrid framework is also very important and is very good when developing an app for Android mobiles, but the native framework stands out for the greater capacity that it has, unlike the other, it is for this reason, the users surveyed refer to the fact that the hybrid framework is better, however, through the comparative analysis that has been done, the best is a native framework. | |
| dc.description | After a detailed investigation proposed by the comparative analysis of hybrid and native frameworks in the development of apps for android mobiles, it is of vital importance to know with which of the two types of frameworks to be able to work as a user, it has been possible to determine that according to the version of the users who have been surveyed make it known that it is better to work or use hybrid frameworks, however, through the collection of data that has been found and the bibliography that has been searched, the respective comparative analysis was carried out where it was possible to show that It is much more recommended to use a native framework in the development of mobile apps in android. Since the advantages that native frameworks have as opposed to hybrid frameworks can be detailed in a very clear way and therefore the improvements that native frameworks bring with them as opposed to hybrid frameworks can be highlighted, it is convenient to be able to use a type of framework that is faster and easier to use when developing a mobile app for android, and therefore have control of what is being done so that the user has a higher quality experience when using or disposing of their mobile. However, we cannot fail to mention that a hybrid framework is also very important and is very good when developing an app for Android mobiles, but the native framework stands out for the greater capacity that it has, unlike the other, it is for this reason, the users surveyed refer to the fact that the hybrid framework is better, however, through the comparative analysis that has been done, the best is a native framework. | |
| dc.description | Luego de una detallada investigación propuesta por el analisis comparativo de los frameworks híbridos y nativos en el desarrollo de apps para moviles android, es de vital importancia saber con cual de los dos tipos de frameworks poder trabajar como usuario, se ha podido deterinar que según la versión de los usuarios que han sido encuestados dan a conocer que es mejor trabajar o usar frameworks hibridos, sin embrago mediante la recopilación de datos que se ha encontrado y la bibliografía que se ha buscado, se realizó el respecivo análisis comparativo donde se pudo evidenciar que es mucho más recomendable utlizar un framework nativo en el desarrollo de app móviles en android. Ya que se pueden detallar de una manera muy clara las ventajas que los frameworks nativos tienen a diferencia de os frameworks hibridos y por ello se puede destacar las mejorar que trae consigo los frameworks nativos a diferencia de los híbridos, es conveniete poder utilizar un tipo de framework que sea más rápido y fácil de utilizar al omento de desarrollar una app móvil para android, y por ello tener el control de lo que se esta haciendo para que el usuario tenga una experiencia de mayor calidad al momento de usar o disponer su móvil. Sin embargo no se puede dejar de mencionar que un framework híbrido también es de mucha importancia y es muy bueno al momento de desarrollar una app para móviles android, pero el framework nativo se destaca por las mayor capacidad que este tiene a diferencia del otro, es por ello que los usuarios encuestados hacen referencia que es mejor el framework híbrido sin embargo mediate el análisis comparativo que se ha hecho el mejor es un framework nativo. | |
| dc.format | 28 p. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | es | |
| dc.publisher | Babahoyo: UTB-FAFI. 2022 | |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/ | |
| dc.subject | Framework | |
| dc.subject | Hibrido | |
| dc.subject | Nativo | |
| dc.subject | Javascrip | |
| dc.subject | URL | |
| dc.subject | RUP | |
| dc.subject | Software | |
| dc.title | Análisis comparativo de los frameworks híbridos y nativos en el desarrollo de apps para móviles Android. | |
| dc.type | bachelorThesis | |
