dc.creatorLEOPOLDO DANIEL GONZALEZ
dc.creatorJOSE MORAL DE LA RUBIA
dc.creatorADRIAN VALLE DE LA O
dc.creatorCIRILO HUMBERTO GARCIA CADENA
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-25T16:00:54Z
dc.date.available2023-07-25T16:00:54Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.revistasaludmental.mx/index.php/salud_mental/
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.inprf.gob.mx/handle/123456789/7454
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7804907
dc.descriptionIntroduction. There is controversy regarding the structure of subjective well-being (SWB) and the possibility of calculating a SWB total score. Objective. To test and compare five models proposed for the description of SWB. Method. The study was implemented with a cross-sectional, ex-post-facto design using an incidental sampling method. The Positive and Negative Experience Scale and the atisfaction with Life Scale were applied to a sample composed of 600 students of health sciences from two universities of Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Data were analyzed through a structural equation modeling, using Maximum Likelihood and Corrected-Bias Percentile methods. Results. The bifactor model comprising three specific factors, vis-à-vis the model composed of three correlated factors, had the best data fit (Δχ2/Δdf = 8.166 > 5, ΔNFI = .018, ΔNNFI = .015, and ΔCFI = .016 > .01), and all its fit indices were close; however, the specific factor related to positive affect had a poor contribution. Nevertheless, the model composed of three correlated factors had the greatest parsimony (PR = .853, PNFI = .804, PNNFI = .813, PCFI = .819, and PGFI = .706) and its three factors showed convergent validity, discriminant validity, and internal consistency reliability. Discussion and conclusion. The two models with the best properties justify the use of a composite score of SWB based on the scores of positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life, as well as scores for these three specific domains of content. From a psychometric perspective, the model composed of three correlated factors yielded the best result.
dc.formatAdobe PDF
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceSalud Mental (01853325) Vol.43 no.3 p.119-127 (2020)
dc.subjectinfo:eu-repo/classification/cti/3
dc.titleStructure analysis of subjective well-being
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución