dc.creator | Henry, Barbara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-01 00:00:00 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-23T16:24:45Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-05T16:26:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-01 00:00:00 | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-23T16:24:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-05T16:26:13Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-01-01 00:00:00 | |
dc.date.created | 2023-01-23T16:24:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | 2539-2239 | |
dc.identifier | 2389-8232 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29936 | |
dc.identifier | https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2625 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6647471 | |
dc.description.abstract | El objetivo que nos proponemos es analizar algunas dinámicas y consecuencias intersubjetivas de la preferencia mimética irrefleja y deshabilitante: el lado oscuro de la preferencia adaptativa. Para lograrlo, la filosofía política, algunas corrientes de los estudios de género y el psicoanálisis relacional son puestos en relación a través de algunos conceptos: control del Sí, intersubjetividad, asimetría, reconocimiento. Por lo tanto, la seducción del sometimiento indica un tipo de intersección entre fenómenos intersubjetivos emergidos y fenómenos intrapsíquicos/intersubjetivos profundos. Aquí suponemos que esta forma de obediencia voluntaria fundamenta, como modalidad de interacción deforme, y no como matriz única, la predisposición reptante y persuasiva ínsita en los mecanismos intersubjetivos de reflexión mimética, según los cuales las víctimas son estimuladas “por sí mismas” a adquirir formas para ellas inadecuadas, con la finalidad de que las acredite y reconozca quien detenta el poder simbólico y material. | |
dc.description.abstract | The proposed objective is to analyze some intersubjective dynamics and consequences of the irreflexive and disabling mimetic preference: the dark side of adaptive preference. To achieve this, a dialogue is proposed among political philosophy, some gender studies streams and relational psychoanalysis through some concepts, such as Self-ownership, intersubjectivity, asymmetry, and recognition. Therefore, the seduction of submission indicates a type of intersection between emergent intersubjective phenomena and deep intrapsychic/intersubjective phenomena. Here we assume that this form of voluntary obedience grounds, as a form of deformed interaction, and not as a single matrix, the persistent and persuasive predisposition within the intersubjective mechanisms of mimetic reflection, according to which the victims are stimulated “by themselves” to acquire inadequate forms for them, with the purpose of being accredited and recognized by those who hold the symbolic and material power. | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Soft Power | |
dc.relation | https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/2625/2435 | |
dc.relation | Núm. 1 , Año 2018 : Enero - Junio | |
dc.relation | 117 | |
dc.relation | 1 | |
dc.relation | 98 | |
dc.relation | 5 | |
dc.relation | Soft Power | |
dc.relation | Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, feminism and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon Books. | |
dc.relation | Benjamin, J. (1993). Phantasie und Geschlecht. Psychoanalytische Studienüber Idealisierung, Anerkennung und Differenz. Frankfurt A. M.: Stroemfeld/Nexus. | |
dc.relation | Benjamin, V. J. (2018). Beyond Doer and Done to. Recognition Theory, Intersubjectivity and the Third. London and New York: Routledge. | |
dc.relation | Bohleber, W. (2016). Identifizierung, Intersubjektivität und die Anerkennungdes Anderen. Laudatioauf Jessica Benjamin, Manuskipt. En J. Benjamin, Anerkennung, Zeugenshaft und Moral. Soziale Traumata in psyshoanalitischer Perspektive, Hans-KilianPreis 2015 (pp. 4-5). Verlag: Psychosozial. | |
dc.relation | Bourdieau, P. & Passeron, J-C. (1970). La reproduction. Éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Paris: Minuit. | |
dc.relation | Bourdieau, P. (1998). La domination masculine. Paris: Seuil. | |
dc.relation | Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses. Towards a Materialistic Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press. | |
dc.relation | Bruckner, D. (2009). In defense of adaptive preferences. Philosophical Studies, 142(3), pp. 307-324. | |
dc.relation | Caillé, A. (Ed.) (2007). La quête de reconnaissance. Nouveau phenomena social total. Paris: La Découverte. | |
dc.relation | Dallmayr, F. (2010). Il dialogo tra le culture. Metodo e protagonisti. Venezia: Marsilio. | |
dc.relation | Dinnerstein, D. (1976). The Mermaid and the Minotaur. New York: Harper and Row. | |
dc.relation | Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-77 (C. Gordon (Ed.)). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. | |
dc.relation | Frankfurt, H. (1982). The importance of what we care about. Synthese, 53, pp. 257-272. | |
dc.relation | Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. | |
dc.relation | Gravett, P. (2017). Mangasia. Wonderlands of Asian Comics. London: Thames & Hudson, Ltd. | |
dc.relation | Henry, B. (2008). Multiculturalismo e misconoscimenti. Prospettive della filosofia politica e del diritto. Post-filosofie, 5, pp. 63-76. | |
dc.relation | Henry, B. (2009). Diritti e identità. En L. Tundo (Ed.), Cosmopolitismo contemporaneo. Morale, politica economia (pp. 129-148). Perugia: Morlacchi. | |
dc.relation | Henry, B. (2012). Asymmetrienim Spiegelbild. En B. Henry & A. Pirni (Eds.), Der Asymmetrische Westen (pp. 115-140). Bielefeld: Transcript. | |
dc.relation | Henry, B. (2014). Alcune chiavi di lettura del multiculturalismo. En M. Calloni, & L. Cedroni (Eds.), Filosofia politica contemporanea (pp. 101-120). Milano: Mondadori. | |
dc.relation | Henry, B. (2016). Valori comuni, valori diversi. Una sfida per le democrazie? En AA. VV., Migration, Demokratie, Menschenrechten (Villa Vigoni im Gespraech) (pp. 19-27). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. | |
dc.relation | Loretoni, A. (2014). Ampliare lo sguardo. Genere e teoria politica. Roma: Donzelli. | |
dc.relation | Nussbaum, M. (2001). Adaptive preferences and women’s options. Economics and Philosophy, 17(1), pp. 67-88. | |
dc.relation | Oakeshott, M. J. (1962). The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind. En Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (pp. 197-199). New York: Basic Books. | |
dc.relation | Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern speak? En C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana and Chicago: Univ. of Illinois Press. | |
dc.relation | Taylor, C. (1992). The Politics of Recognition. En A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition” (pp. 25-73). Princeton: Princeton University Press. | |
dc.relation | Walzer, M. (1999). Geografia della morale. Democrazia, tradizioni e universalismo. Bari: Dedalo. | |
dc.relation | Winnicot, D. W. (1971). Playing and Reality. New York: Penguin. | |
dc.relation | Wolgast, E. H. (1991). La grammatica della giustizia (S. Coyaud (trad.)). Roma: Editori Riuniti. | |
dc.relation | Zincone, G. (1994). Uno schermo contro il razzismo. Per una politica dei diritti utili. Roma: Donzelli. | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | Barbara Henry - 2018 | |
dc.source | https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2625 | |
dc.subject | Seducción del sometimiento | |
dc.subject | Preferencia adaptativa | |
dc.subject | Asimetría | |
dc.subject | Reconocimiento | |
dc.subject | Psicoanálisis relacional | |
dc.subject | Seduction of submission | |
dc.subject | Adaptive preference | |
dc.subject | Asymmetry | |
dc.subject | Recognition | |
dc.subject | Relational psychoanalysis | |
dc.title | El sometimiento voluntario como lado oscuro de la preferencia adaptativa : la contribución del psicoanálisis relacional a la filosofía política. | |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | |