dc.creatorTorres-Chávez, Álvaro
dc.creatorTovar y Romo, Ángel
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T15:37:50Z
dc.date.available2008-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2023-01-23T15:37:50Z
dc.date.created2008-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.created2023-01-23T15:37:50Z
dc.date.issued2008-07-01
dc.identifier1909-9711
dc.identifier0123-9155
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10983/28102
dc.identifierhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/300
dc.description.abstractSe analizó la formación de clases de estímulos equivalentes vía reglas verbales mediante la utilización de un procedimiento de igualación de la muestra en un formato de “papel y lápiz” para el entrenamiento y evaluación de discriminaciones condicionales. Participaron voluntariamente 36 estudiantes universitarios; el grupo experimental recibió entrenamiento de línea base vía reglas verbales, pruebas de mantenimiento de línea base y pruebas de equivalencia; el grupo control sólo recibió las pruebas. El instrumento desarrollado mostró ser efectivo. Un número considerable de participantes del grupo experimental logró formar dos clases de estímulos equivalentes, a diferencia del grupo control en que ninguno de los participantes formó las clases. El desarrollo de procedimientos efectivos con “papel y lápiz” y reglas, podría apoyar la enseñanza de habilidades básicas de lectura en poblaciones grandes con economía de tiempo y dinero.
dc.description.abstractEquivalent class formation through verbal rules was analyzed. A matching-to-sample procedure for training and probing of conditional discriminations in a “paper and pencil” format was used. Participants were 36 voluntary students, divided in two groups. The baseline training for the experimental group was carried out via verbal rules. This group also received maintenance probes and equivalence probes during the baseline period. The control group was only given the probes. The instrument used proved to be effective. The majority of participants in the experimental group formed two equivalent classes, unlike the control group in which none of the participants showed class formation. The development of effective procedures using “paper and pencil” and verbal rules format, could support the teaching of basic reading skills in large populations with a resulting economy of time and money.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica de Colombia
dc.relationhttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/300/305
dc.relationNúm. 2 , Año 2008
dc.relation53
dc.relation2
dc.relation47
dc.relation11
dc.relationActa Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relationBush, K. M., Sidman, M. & de Rose, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29-45.
dc.relationCumming, W. W. & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. En D.I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization. (Pp. 284-330). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
dc.relationDickins, T. & Dickins, D., (2001). Symbols, stimulus equivalence and the origins of language. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 221-244.
dc.relationEikeseth, S., Rosales-Ruiz, J., Duarte, A. & Baer, D., (1997). The quick development of equivalence classes in a paperand-pencil format trough written instructions. The Psychological Record, 47, 275-284.
dc.relationGuerrero, A. P. & Ortiz, G. (2007). El papel de la retroalimentación y la ausencia o presencia de instrucciones en la elaboración de descripciones en tareas de discriminación condicional. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 10, 5-13.
dc.relationMcIlvane, W. (2000). Methods for studying symbolic behavior and category formation: contributions of stimulus equivalence research. Developmental Review, 21, 355-374.
dc.relationShimizu, H. (2006). Testing response-stimulus equivalence relations using differential responses as a sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 239-251.
dc.relationSidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 4, 5-13.
dc.relationSidman, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. En S. C. Hayes & . J. Hayes (Eds.) Understanding verbal relations. The second and third international institute on verbal relations. (Pp. 15-27). Reno, Nevada: Context Press.
dc.relationSidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A Research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
dc.relationSidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
dc.relationSidman, M. & Cresson, O., Jr. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515-523.
dc.relationSidman, M. & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
dc.relationSkinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.
dc.relationSkinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of Reinforcement: A theoretical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
dc.relationVause, T., Martin, G. L., Yu, C. T., Marion, C., & Sakko, G. (2005). Teaching equivalence relations to individuals with minimal verbal repertoires: Are visual and auditory-visual discriminations predictive of stimulus equivalence? The Psychological Record, 55, 197-218.
dc.relationWulfert, E. & Hayes, S. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsÁlvaro Torres Chávez, Ángel Tovar y Romo - 2008
dc.sourcehttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/300
dc.subjectStimulus equivalence
dc.subjectMatching-to-sample
dc.subjectConditional discrimination
dc.subjectVerbal rules
dc.subjectPaper and pencil format
dc.subjectCollege students
dc.subjectEquivalencia de estímulos
dc.subjectDiscriminación condicional
dc.subjectIgualación de la muestra
dc.subjectReglas verbales
dc.subjectFormato manual
dc.subjectEstudiantes universitarios
dc.subjectEquivalência de estímulos
dc.subjectDiscriminação condicional
dc.subjectIgualação da amostra
dc.subjectRegras verbais
dc.subjectFormato manual
dc.subjectEstudantes universitários
dc.titleFormación de clases equivalentes a través de reglas verbales y formato manual.
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución