masterThesis
Phrasal Verbs for Business Professionals
Fecha
2012Registro en:
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Needham
Heights: A Pearson Education Company.
Brown, D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson
Education.
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic
sequences and perceived oral proficiency: putting a Lexical Approach to the test.
Language Teaching research.10,3, 245-261.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A guide for
Practicioners. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Centeno, J. (2007). Communication Disorders in Spanish Speakers: Theoretical, Research
and Clinical. Tonawanda NY: Multilingual Matters.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). How Research methods in edition
(5thEdition ed.) London: RoutledgeFalmer
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures
and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc, 3rd edition.
De Knop, S. & de Rycker, T. (2008). Applications of Cognitive Linguistics: Cognitive
approaches to pedagogical grammar. A volume in honour of René Dirven. New
York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Frederiksen, N. (1984).Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving.
Review of Educational Research, 54 (3), 363-407.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Harwood, N. (2002). Taking the lexical approach to teaching: principles and problems.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, No 2, 139-155.
Housen, A. & Pierrard, M. (2005). Studies on Language Acquisition: Investigations in
Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co. KG
Publishers.
Knowles, M. (1990). The adult learner. A neglected species. Houston: Gulf
Publishing.
Kurtyka, A. (2001). Teaching English phrasal verbs: a cognitive approach. In applied
cognitive linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mounton de Gruyter
Lengyel, Z. &Navracsics, J.(2007). Second Language Lexical Processes: Applied linguistic
and psycholinguistic perspectives. Tonawanda NY: Multilingual Matters
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical Approach. London: Language Teaching Publications.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts; selected papers on group dynamics. New
York: Harper & Row, 1948.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw Hill.
Nattinger, J. (1980). A lexical phrase grammar for ESL.TESOL Quarterly, 14, 337-344.
O'Hanlon, C. (2003). Educational Inclusion As Action Research : An Interpretive
Discourse. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Education.
Pawley, A. & Frances H. S. (2000). “The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis.”
University of Michigan Press. 163-199
Sanz, C.(2006).Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory,
and Practice. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press
Swan M. & Smith B. (2003). Learner English: a teacher’s guide to interference and other
problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thornbury, S. (2006).An A-Z of ELT. Oxford: Macmillan Publisher Limited.
Tuma, D. & Reif, F. (1980). Problem Solving and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wallace, M. J. (1998).Action Research for Language Teachers. United Kingdom:
Cambridge University Press
West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27(1), 1-19.
Weiss, E. (2005).Elements of International English Style: A guide to writing English
correspondence, reports, technical documents, and Internet Pages for a global
audience. Armonk NY: M.E. Sharpe
159389
TE05798
Autor
Maldonado Chacón, Pedro Pablo
Cuesta Medina, Liliana Marcela
Institución
Resumen
Muy poco se ha escrito acerca de la estrategia para enseñar léxico, particularmente para la enseñanza de verbos frasales en latinoamérica. Aún cuando el uso de los verbos frasales es significativo; una investigación acerca de la enseñanza de estos verbos para contextos específicos no ha sido examinada. Sin embargo, este estudio está enfocado en la exploración de una estrategia bien definida y en los efectos de la misma. La meta fué promover que el estudiante adulto tuviese una producción oral natural en inglés. Sorprendentemente la ausencia de materiales activó el uso de tecnología en el aula. Las implicaciones pedagógicas de éste estudio brindan la importancia acerca del ambiente de aprendizaje en donde el estudiante adulto busca sus propios instrumentos.