Dissertação
O sistema de responsabilização pelas despesas processuais no processo civil brasileiro e o princípio da causualidade
Fecha
2011-10-31Registro en:
MOREIRA NETO, Paulo Rodolfo de Rangel. O sistema de responsabilização pelas despesas processuais no processo civil brasileiro e o princípio da causualidade. 2011. 164 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, Recife, 2011.
Autor
Moreira Neto, Paulo Rodolfo de Rangel
Resumen
Since the most remote civilizations, where the procedural activity, albeit in embryonic form, unfolding in an orderly and systematic, it presents a clear notion that the quest for realization of a right infringed involves the production costs. These are not limited to procedural cost of travel itself, as the payment of expenses for maintaining the functional structure of justice and
those belonging to it at various levels. Already in ancient Greece, when it allowed the citizen to be represented before the Court by a consultant, evolved into today's professional advocacy, prosecutorial activity involves the allocation of expenditures indispensable parties without whom the realization of their rights may be compromise. And in the end, when the law would be ensured by the delivery by the judiciary on judicial protection, citizens still can not see fully satisfied its claim until it has reimbursed the expenses were being forced to make to the realization of their right. Such a scenario demanded the Science of Law to develop
systems of accountability of the parties for the expenses generated by the process which finally resulted in the Chiovenda s thesis, the theory of defeat, today harshly criticized by the criterion of causality. The research aims to investigate the structure of these systems of
accountability, starting with the analysis of the most relevant theories attributing the financial
burden of the process, the historical juncture Greco-Roman, to the scenario Luso-Brazilian, Empire to Republic. Analyzes some foreign legal systems, merging the study of existing qualifications to the doctrine of each country. Understand the evolution of the Brazilian procedural law, notes about the positioning of national doctrinal dogma of the fall, then going to a critical analysis of this criterion against the principle of causality. Finally, this paper investigates the possibility of peaceful coexistence of the criteria of defeat and causality,
questioning the reasons and goals of each one