dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor | University of Kentucky | |
dc.contributor | University of Maryland School of Dentistry | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-01T10:19:02Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-20T03:44:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-01T10:19:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-20T03:44:56Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-05-01T10:19:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | Journal of Periodontology. | |
dc.identifier | 0022-3492 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233808 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1002/JPER.21-0212 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-85119333374 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5413907 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Xenogeneic matrices (XMs) have been increasingly used for root coverage procedures. This study compared the use of two types of XM (collagen matrix [CM] and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix [XDM]) associated with the coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) to treat single gingival recessions. Methods: Seventy-five patients presenting single RT1 gingival recession were treated by CAF (control group, n = 25), CAF+CM (test group 1, n = 25), or CAF+XDM (test group 2, n = 25) and completed 6-month follow-up. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic assessments were performed and intra- and intergroup differences were analyzed. Results: At 6 months, the mean recession reduction for CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM was 2.4 ± 0.8 mm, 2.4 ± 0.9 mm and 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding mean percentage of root coverage was 78.9% ± 26.2% for CAF, 78.0% ± 28.5% for CAF+CM, and 65.6% ± 26.9% for CAF+XDM (P > 0.05). Dentin hypersensitivity and esthetic conditions showed significantly improvements in all groups. Test groups presented significant gains in gingival thickness (GT; CAF+CM: 0.4 ± 0.3 mm; CAF+XDM: 0.4 ± 0.2 mm) compared to the control group (CAF: 0.0 ± 0.1 mm; P < 0.05). Conclusion: The CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM treatments each provided similar results in the treatment of single gingival recessions. The addition of either CM or XDM to CAF increases the GT. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Journal of Periodontology | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | connective tissue graft(s) | |
dc.subject | cosmetic periodontal plastic surgery | |
dc.subject | gingival recession | |
dc.title | Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |