dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | UPE – University of Pernambuco | |
dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.contributor | Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-25T11:08:16Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-19T22:38:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-25T11:08:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-19T22:38:16Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-25T11:08:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | Saudi Dental Journal, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2021. | |
dc.identifier | 1013-9052 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208210 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.11.002 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-85097071124 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5388807 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy chlorhexidine chip as an adjunctive therapy of scaling and root planning on periodontal disease treatment. Material and methods: This study follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019148221). The search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases until April 2020. The PICO question was: “Is the chlorhexidine chip (CHX) effective as an adjunctive therapy of scaling and root planning on periodontal disease treatment?”. Inclusion criteria involved: randomized controlled clinical trials, with a minimum of 15 patients included on the sample and each patient has two sites of probing depth of ≥5 mm; The minimum follow up was at least 1 months of follow-up and the outcomes present in the studies probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI) and clinical attachment level (CAL) after scaling and root planning (SRP). Results: After searching the databases, 13 articles were selected for qualitative and 8 for quantitative analysis. Were included 427 patients, with a mean age of 45.6 years. The results shown that the association of chlorhexidine chips to scaling and root planning reduce periodontal pocket depths (P < 0.00001; MD −0.77 [CI −1.0 to −0.55]; I2 = 23%, P = 0.24), gain on the clinical attachment level (P < 0.0001; MD −0.57 [CI −0.86 to −0.27]; I2 = 33%, P = 0.18P < 0.0001) and reduction on plaque index (P = 0.04; MD −0.23 [CI −0.45 to −0.01]; I2 = 91%, P < 0.00001). Conclusions: Thus, we can conclude that chlorhexidine chip when used associated to scaling and root planning promoted a significant improvement the reduction of periodontal diseases. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Saudi Dental Journal | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Chlorhexidine gluconate | |
dc.subject | Dental scaling | |
dc.subject | Periodontal diseases | |
dc.subject | Systematic review | |
dc.title | Use of chlorhexidine chip after scaling and root planning on periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis | |
dc.type | Otros | |