dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:30:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T22:15:55Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:30:27Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T22:15:55Z
dc.date.created2021-06-25T10:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.identifierJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 13, n. 5, p. 505-510, 2021.
dc.identifier1989-5488
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/206340
dc.identifier10.4317/jced.57654
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85105818044
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5386937
dc.description.abstractBackground: Nylon is a polymer that its use to reinforce dental resins has shown positive results such as increased flexural strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between dental resins and a nylon reinforcement. Material and Methods: Forty cylindrical nylon blocks with 13 x 23 mm with 0.5% by volume of silica and 40 without were made. Half of the samples of each nylon composition were sandblasted with aluminum oxide (50µm) for 3 s (2.8 bar pressure, distance: 20 mm, incidence angle: 90o). On the nylon blocks, cylinders of chemically activated acrylic resin and indirect composite resin were made, with a bonding area of 6,28 mm2. Eight different groups were obtained according to the material used and the surface treatment (n = 10): Acrylic Resin + Nylon; GAS: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica; GAT: Acrylic Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GAST: Acrylic Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3); GC: Composite Resin + Nylon; GCS: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica; GCT: Composite Resin + Nylon (Al2O3); GCST: Composite Resin + Nylon with Silica (Al2O3). The shear test was carried out. The Student's and the Kruskal-Wallis test was adopted. Results: There was no statistically difference in the bond strength for nylon with silica for the acrylic resin group. For the composite groups, nylon with silica did not present a statistically difference without surface treatment (p = 0.10) and with surface treatment the bond strength decreased (p = 0.000). The GCT showed a higher bond strength (0.89 MPa). The surface treatment improved the bond strength for the both groups. Conclusions: The presence of silica in the nylon composition did not influence the bond strength between materials evaluated. However, the surface treatment with aluminum oxide proved to be favorable for this adhesion.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectNylons - Resins
dc.subjectSynthetic - Structures Strengthening - Dental Research
dc.titleAnalysis of bond strength between a nylon reinforcement structure and dental resins
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución