dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:18:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T20:43:32Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:18:49Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T20:43:32Z
dc.date.created2020-12-12T01:18:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-01
dc.identifierJournal of strength and conditioning research, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1078-1085, 2020.
dc.identifier1533-4287
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/198663
dc.identifier10.1519/JSC.0000000000002789
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85082253066
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5379297
dc.description.abstractMalta, ES, Brisola, GMP, de Poli, RAB, Dutra, YM, Franchini, E, and Zagatto, AM. Metabolic profile and performance responses during two consecutive sessions of sprint interval training. J Strength Cond Res 34(4): 1078-1085, 2020-The study aimed to (a) typify the cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and performance responses during a single sprint interval training (SIT) session, (b) investigate the interference of 2 subsequent sessions on cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and performance responses, and (c) verify the relationships of SIT total work performed with aerobic fitness indices. Thirty-six untrained men performed 2 SIT sessions (SIT1 and SIT2) separated by 24 hours of recovery. Each session was composed of 4 Wingate bouts interspersed by 4 minutes. Within SIT sessions, bout work, peak power, and mean power of each Wingate bout decreased significantly, while the fatigue index increased over time (p < 0.001). The SIT elicited lower acute responses of oxygen uptake and heart rate than maximal values (≈67 and ≈79%, respectively) (p < 0.05) as well as a short time spent at high cardiorespiratory demand. For SIT outcomes, no interactions were verified between Wingate bout performance, average heart rate, and average oxygen uptake. In addition, the oxygen uptake integral (SIT1:300.5 ± 38.6 ml·kg; SIT2:306.9 ± 41.1 ml·kg) and total work (SIT1:54.6 ± 10.4 kJ; SIT2:54.9 ± 10.6 kJ) did not differ between SIT sessions (p > 0.05). Furthermore, significant moderate to strong correlations were found between SIT1 and SIT2 total work and peak oxygen uptake (r = 0.48; r = 0.52, respectively), maximal aerobic power (r = 0.89; r = 0.89, respectively), and respiratory compensation point (r = 0.80; r = 0.78, respectively). In summary, an SIT session elicited a short time spent at high cardiorespiratory demand, while the SIT total work was significantly correlated with aerobic fitness indices. In addition, 2 consecutive SIT sessions interspaced by 24 hours did not affect performance outcomes, or cardiorespiratory and blood responses.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of strength and conditioning research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleMetabolic Profile and Performance Responses During Two Consecutive Sessions of Sprint Interval Training
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución