Artículos de revistas
SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
Fecha
2019-01-01Registro en:
Quaestio Iuris. Rio De Janeiro Rj: Univ Estado Rio Janeiro, v. 12, n. 3, p. 212-233, 2019.
1807-8389
10.12957/rqi.2019.39613
WOS:000519617300011
Autor
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Institución
Resumen
This article has as its theme methodologies for examining constitutional courts in the field of constitutional law, in interdisciplinary reading with political science. In detail, studies on the operation and performance of the Federal Supreme Court in Brazil, considering the design of the Federal Constitution of 1988. The problem deals with the possibility of identification of the Supreme Court as a veto player, having as methodological theoretical reference the work of George Tsebelis. The hypothesis considers possible such a methodological option, and aims to identify its analytical potential for understanding the relations between the powers of the Republic in the contemporary Brazilian state. The method used is bibliographic, with institutional analyses, resulting in the conclusion of the broad possibility of application of such a theoretical milestone, as well as the need for some precautions to improve their analytical potential in relation to the power Judiciary.