dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorSchool of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T17:14:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T19:07:16Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T17:14:13Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T19:07:16Z
dc.date.created2019-10-06T17:14:13Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierOral Health and Preventive Dentistry, v. 17, n. 3, p. 283-288, 2019.
dc.identifier1757-9996
dc.identifier1602-1622
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/190469
dc.identifier10.3290/j.ohpd.a42659
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85068383101
dc.identifier9807879196081999
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5371507
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated carious tissue removal by mechanical and chemomechanical methods (Carisolv and Papacárie) through colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus sp. Treatment acceptability, presence and level of pain, use of anesthesia, time required for caries removal and pain 24 h after treatment were also compared. Materials and Methods: A clinical trial with 32 individuals who had at least two deciduous molars with active occlusal caries lesions were selected and randomly divided into two groups (I and II). One lesion in each individual was excavated with hand excavator only. The remaining lesions were excavated using modified hand excavation and Carisolv in group 1 or modified hand-excavation and Papacárie in group 2. Bacterial samples were taken from each caries lesion before and after treatment. Results: All the methods reduced the amount of cultivable Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus sp. after treatment (p < 0.05) and no statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). There was 97% acceptability of treatments, and anesthesia was used in 14% of teeth. Pain was present 24 h after treatment in 6% of teeth. The mean times for caries removal by the mechanical and chemomechanical treatments were not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05). Conclusions: All treatments were found to effectively reduce bacterial counts (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) among treatments or between clinical variables (p > 0.05).
dc.languageeng
dc.relationOral Health and Preventive Dentistry
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDeciduous teeth
dc.subjectDental atraumatic restorative treatment
dc.subjectDental caries
dc.subjectPain
dc.subjectPapain
dc.titleClinical and microbiological analysis of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous teeth
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución